Bleeding Bills Blue

I think the trade of diggs was not.. based on the philosophy of the position. It was more of a locker room and general team issue. Since it happened on 4/3, that's likely an indication that they were prepared to enter the season with him at the position, and that samuel was more of a replacement for davis than anything else.

The stats in those 2 ACC games without travis are pretty brutal. 20/46 for 189 yards and 0 TDs over 2 games. Not saying Travis starting is going to blow the numbers out, but they were trying to win and the only way to do that was to not pass the ball.

But the other guy wasn't here when he signed. No guarantee probably means no Morrow. Not to mention... Best guy makes the team. They allotted ~1.5M to that depth LB spot. Williams is likely a locked in 3rd backer - Ulofoshio is a probably. Then you have 3 guys Morrow, Spector (rookie deal), Jones (vet min) battling for the other spot or two. Whoever you keep costs 1.5M essentially.

Look at it like this - Morrow 1.5M cap hit, 750k Guaranteed. If he doesn't make the team (say Ulofoshio does) - and his first year is like 850K. So it ends up being a net loss of 100K in cap space.

Perhaps a double dip, definitely expect one (probably early). Depends on free agency though. I'd imagine with just Epenesa, and Groot (pending extension) with everyone else expiring or a cap cut (miller). I think its key that they use their top 3 picks at premium positions like CB, DE, WR in some order.

I think they'll let them practice a little first before they make that determination... Personally, Fields still looks like a rookie to me. Wow plays with the arm and legs, bad sacks and turnovers, and inconsistency across the board. The Bears had a poor offense every year he was there. He has missed time all 3 NFL seasons, and the Steelers have no future commitment. I also think Tomlin wanted Wilson because he was tired of having young QBs the last 2 seasons. New experienced offensive coordinator, new experienced QB, and their top 2 picks were offensive linemen.

Yup - Try and get one or two if you have player turnover, but it basically means you aren't extending players coming off rookie deals. So in most likely scenarios, you are up against the cap. 4 and 5 isn't terrible, but I think buffalo probably only "needs" 1 of those picks. If they get the 4th round comp pick, that'd give them 7 picks in the first 135. There will be more roster turnover, but that really gives you a great opportunity to add depth to positions that likely need it. Going into next season I'd see some level of: WR - I don't know how everything works out here, but i think they'll add to the room again next season TE2 - Knox is a cap casualty candidate. Could be had a bit later as well. OL - Have added C and G. Depends what happens with Spencer Brown and FA, but i could see a tackle being in here as well as another guard. DL - Desperately need a pass rusher. 1T could also be a target. DB - Corner, Safety

Could be they changed it. I think including void years to lower a cap hit is fine, but in the context of a comp pick discussion i'd almost have to eliminate them. How do you calculate an APY including void years IE Leonard Floyd. Either you don't get the comp pick because you "cut him" and have dead cap on your books, or you get the comp pick, but his APY is calculated as a 1 year deal at the full value. I do know the bengals moving into the 3rd was because of bates making all-pro. There are a few other reasons that edmunds could've moved from 3rd to 4th beyond his playing time. They also moved the player 3rd round cut-off up i believe when factoring in the coaching hire 3rd round picks.

It doesn't have anything to do with the cap actually. Just average per year - the highest APY is the highest point total. You then factor in snap% and any awards. The Salary cap exists as a tool to ensure a revenue share - the cap rises with corresponding revenue to ensure that the players total split is taken into account. As players make more money every year on new deals, the existing player contracts point total decreases because now other players make more money than the year prior. Void years don't count in the formula as there is no salary on the books for that year so it is essentially just dead cap. If you wanted void years to count as a contracted year, then in my opinion they wouldn't be eligible for comp picks in the same way a released player doesn't count.

https://overthecap.com/compensatory-picks 4th round comp picks are currently in a range between about 21M and 11.5.

https://overthecap.com/compensatory-formula - I agree that the NFL is right to not use a formula that uses cap number alone as that isn't the only thing tied to compensation. Void years allow you to pay a player a higher salary but lessen cap burden - but the average per year should remain the same if that's what you are measuring players against. The highest APY point value is the highest paid player, and the lowest APY point value is the lowest. Buffalo also lost their 3rd because jessie bates made 2nd team all-pro (honors category). This additional 20 points put him at 1878 points, which was 13 points higher than Edmunds. Bates was originally listed as a 4th round player that cancelled out with Orlando Brown. Orlando Browns 4th round value cannot cancel out a 3rd round player (unless they don't carry a net player loss), so Brown instead cancelled out Vonn Bell in the 6th. Looking at 2025, the only likely way we'd lose a pick is if hollins jumps into that cutoff (or settle falls behind it, or both). Hollins is ranked at 671 and is right next to the cutoff of 670, but he'd need to exceed his 45% snaps from 2023 in order to raise the 1281 point total. Other players in that range can do the same though - it isn't just tied to compensatory qualifying players. Settle falling out is probably less likely - he'd need to play fewer than 30% of snaps to lower his point total. Even at 0 snaps he's still 1284 which is above Hollins. Of all the free agents: Davis is a 4th, and 11 points clear of cutoff. He played 72% of snaps last year and barring major injury that seems likely again with ridley and zay jones departing and him and BTJ replacing. As long as buffalo remains a net loss, they will get a 4th for Davis. Leonard floyd is a 5th. Decreased snap counts likely don't bump him out. Curtis samuel would need to increase snaps considerably to jump into 5th round territory. If he jumps into 5, the 2nd comp pick becomes a 6 for Dane Jackson. Dane is very low on the 6th round chart, but he's a projected starter so i'd assume he sticks Dodson has a potential to jump into 6th if he starts. Johnson could maybe jump into 6. Edwards is barely in the cuttoff, as is settle. All this to say - i would say the 5th is at risk, but it would require either Samuel jumping into the 5th and moving the pick to the 6th. Or Hollins jumping in as a 4th CFA gained and we'd lose the lowest pick we had. I would say having 6 picks through round 4 is plenty anyway tbh.

Wilson is actually a pretty good fit for an Arthur Smith offense. What he was NOT was a fit for a Sean Payton offense. 2 low risk moves at QB for a team that was in the playoffs a year ago with some terrible combination of Pickett and Rudolph with the worst offensive coordinator in football. Lots of draft capital spent on offensive line to improve one of the weaker units. I don't think they're all of a sudden super bowl contenders, but they're probably better than they were a year ago.

Eh... that stat gets a little tricky for Coleman in my understanding. Team completion percentage was 77% for oregon, vs. 60% for FSU. Oregon had 514 passing plays, vs. 433 for FSU. That means 137 more completed pass plays for Oregon. The 3rd leading WR at FSU had 14 catches, so I'd say Coleman played more offensive snaps - therefore running more routes. Florida state used 3 QBs. Rodemaker and Glenn were very bad when playing at the end of the season. Context matters. Oregon throws a lot of short easy ones.

Nice try... they only scored 27 😄

Did Waller..?