ny33

I'm seeing a tackle recorded by Brooks, but no pass breakups. Gilmore had two deflections; Scott, Barnett, Rogers, and Mario had one each. I'm amazed that we shut down Luck and still lost the game. It looks like this defense has started to gel.

He's had a few tough sideline grabs.

Did anyone see if they got any defensive snaps? I heard Silva's name during the game, but wasn't particularly paying attention to the screen; it may have been a special teams play.

Yep, it was a sack.

He's not an NFL QB.

You do realize that Chandler is a terrible blocker, right?

7-9.

White Plains is in Westchester, just 45 minutes from the city. Why on Earth would people there be Bills fans?

Hah.

Who do you think is the weak point on the offensive line? I think the reason we can't get 2 yards on third and short is that a) we run a poorly-designed wildcat play, b) we have Spiller hesitate, or c) we run Tashard Choice. I don't understand why our third RB isn't a battering ram or prospect.

He is an average QB. He's better than Tarvaris or Thigpen, yes, but we need to draft a potential franchise QB if we see one.

If we lose we'll probably end up 6-10. If we win, I see 7-9 wins on the year.

It's just my opinion. I agree with Joe_the_6_pack that Buffalo looks like it should win this game, but I just don't have enough faith in this team to see them shut down Luck in critical situations. I hope I'm wrong, though.

A) No, that's just incorrect. B) You can post the facts and write a short post that doesn't give the reader a headache. It's easier to read four hundred well-written words in a paragraph than fifty words that form a giant, incomprehensible sentence. If, say, you used bullet points and incomplete sentences, it's still possible to get your point across. Look at my posting history. I complain about your posts because they are generally incomprehensible, not because you make a few grammatical errors. Is it too much to ask for posters to take a few seconds to write in a legible manner? People might take what you have to say more seriously if you took the time to attempt proper sentences.

Indianapolis 27, Buffalo 20.

This isn't a nine-win team.

The difference between Cam and a guy like Russell or Losman is that Cam hasn't been bad; he's been average. He will always be an NFL starter, but, yes, it is somewhat up in the air as to whether he can become elite.

Hahah, yes. All you have to do is look at the board after a win or a loss to see the extreme views come out on both sides.

I don't think I had a single post about Cam. Also, RG3 has been far more efficient than Newton. Newton put up yards, but also a ton of picks and incompletions; RG3 doesn't make many mistakes. Yes, the RGIII trade was a great deal.

Between the Dolphins, Jets, Rams, and Jaguars, we'll win at least two games. I wouldn't be surprised if we beat Seattle or Indy; we'll finish with 7 or 8 wins.

If you trade three picks and get one back, you've traded three first round picks. That being said, yes, it was an excellent deal for Washington.

If we lose this game, our chances of making the playoffs go from about 9% to 1%.

RG3 throws bombs or short passes, from what I've seen.

Is this supposed to be a sentence?

I was thinking Rich Gannon, but both are good comparisons.