-
Posts
19,185 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by BringBackFergy
-
Playoff teams keys player(s)
BringBackFergy replied to PatsFanNH's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Bills Key Loss: Nickell Robey Coleman. The kid is a "deranged squirrel". (Can't use rhino because that was "Snacks") -
Column: "Pats have clear road to Super Bowl"
BringBackFergy replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I don't root for injuries...but yes, I hope Pittsburgh plays a "physical" game -
Column: "Pats have clear road to Super Bowl"
BringBackFergy replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Ugh. Let them pound their chests...arrogant pricks. Slow and steady wins the race. I'm calling it here...Steelers will give the Patriots fits this weekend. -
True
-
Agreed...which makes that Jets game even more painful in Week 2.
-
In order to review whether there is a turnover, you have to apply "ALL" NFL rules. As such, the replay official would make the following analysis: 1) Was there a turnover (on downs)? Yes 2) Was it a fumble? No 3) Was it an interception? No 4) What the hell was it? A WR had his right arm put in an arm bar by the CB. 5) Is an arm bar legal while covering a WR? No 6) Did the ref throw a flag for the arm bar? No 7) Why the hell didn't the ref throw a flag for the arm bar? Because he was scared Richard Sherman might jump up and down and B word about how unfair the NFL rules are. 8) Well, screw Richard Sherman, the pass fell incomplete because of an illegal arm bar. Therefore, there is no turnover on downs. Replay 4th down.
-
I suppose that's my argument. The NFL allows replays on turnovers...this was a turnover (on downs) because they failed to make a first down. Review it (and then let the NFL look like a bunch of !@#$s because even after the review they would still say "It was an incomplete pass"). And I agree with Jimmy10 above (and referenced it in my OP)...we will be looking at this kind of gamesmanship when we play the SeaHags. Keep interfering with the WR's because they won't call PI on every play. Let's just hope it goes both ways. I suppose if Richard Sherman can B word, yell and moan enough about the NFL, they will give him breaks.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxrNZYJnJsE It was 4th and long. The Falcons needed to get a first down to keep the final drive alive and get within field goal range. Ryan drops back and throws this ball to Julio Jones. Richard Sherman clearly interferes (I have seen much less get called for PI). This "no call" is an abomination or might just be the way refs look at the "Legion of Boom"...give them the benefit of the doubt because they are "physical". Anyway, I was thinking how helpless a coach must be when the refs don't call a penalty like this because "no calls" are not reviewable. However, I went a step further and thought about what IS reviewable: Touchdowns Sideline plays A "catch" Turnovers Isn't a failed 4th and 18 really a "turnover" on downs? If that's the case, that play should have been reviewable because it was a turnover. I would have demanded a review by the NFL right then and there to review the pass because it was a turnover on 4th and long resulting in turnover to the SeaHags. Then let the NFL official in the booth review the obvious interference and come back with a ruling that they should replay 4th down because Julio Jones was basically raped and there can be no turnover when a receivers arms are taken away from him. Falcons ball!!
-
TBD parking 49ers game at Hammer's Lot sign up
BringBackFergy replied to mead107's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
^^^^^^ Me -
No Dareus or Sammy? No problem
BringBackFergy replied to BringBackFergy's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Nice pressure on Kaep today. Not bad. I wonder if Marcel will be "available" next week? -
TBD parking 49ers game at Hammer's Lot sign up
BringBackFergy replied to mead107's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Menu items: Bloody Marys, stromboli (breakfast and meat), Bacon and eggs, BLTs, chili, doughnuts. Beer. Stuffed. -
No Dareus or Sammy? No problem
BringBackFergy replied to BringBackFergy's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Being cold is different from logical. Dareus is a good DT (although our run D has been acceptable without him in there). Is it wrong to point out that he should have been ready to play for the Rams game (and now the Niners game)? No. -
No Dareus or Sammy? No problem
BringBackFergy replied to BringBackFergy's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Fact: Marcell smoked synthetic weed suspended two games. Fact: Marcell knew the next time he violated controlled substance ban he would miss 4 games. Fact: Marcell "missed" (avoided) drug test knowing this would result in 4 game suspension. Fact: As a multimillionaire "team leader" shouldn't he have assured his teammates he would be ready to roll vs the Rams? Most would say yes. Fact: Marcell was not ready to roll Fact: We have won the last three games without him. -
Helluva a catch by Hunter Henry. Pass had some zip on it.
-
No Dareus or Sammy? No problem
BringBackFergy replied to BringBackFergy's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
He has ADD and Bruce Smith helped him with this. That might be why he forgot to stay in shape. -
No Dareus or Sammy? No problem
BringBackFergy replied to BringBackFergy's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I think it's a very real conversation right now. 3 wins in a row and no high profile WR or DT. A crew of under appreciated "no names". Let's see how this plays out. -
No Dareus or Sammy? No problem
BringBackFergy replied to BringBackFergy's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Definitely not. Our D line has been playing well without him. Why upset the apple cart? -
No Dareus or Sammy? No problem
BringBackFergy replied to BringBackFergy's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
...or maybe it won't.