Jump to content

Mango

Community Member
  • Posts

    9,277
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mango

  1. Everybody on the show gets praised by Gruden, again, if they weren't nobody would go near the studio before the draft.
  2. until the 'nascar package' which seems to be a super hurry up single read option package, nassib is pretty unremarkable. this is good news for buffalo because we have an offensive coordinator who can scheme and take the pressure of the qb in reading defenses and putting the ball on point. our offense could develop some nice rhythm. the bad news is nassib is a product of the system
  3. i came back to this board thinking this was still a nassib thread...guess not he looked terrible on gruden. sounded a little slow, lacked understanding. it's tough to look bad on that show considering gruden just lobs questions to these guys. in gruden's defense, he can't be critical or nobody would come back. manuel sounded like a stud for what it is worth.
  4. what do they really have to tall about anyways? they have already gone over literally every game day decision he has ever made
  5. i think that is exactly the issue. what information? you have years worth of game tape on a ton of these guys, what else do you need to know? i understand the ability to read defenses and understand offense, and those are important, but a lot of that will come across on film as well as ability in game day situations
  6. The whole QB situation with the Bills is a bit sloppy, and every year guys fly way up big boards because of all the down time from filming to the draft. If I am the Bills I would be weary of any QB that makes significant leaps from the end of the college season to the draft. I understand and agree with the over valued position of QB by maybe a round, but beware of the Gabbert effect. It is just downtime, which leads to excuse making. If the draft happened 2 weeks after the Super Bowl we would see a much different draft. -Manuel was a 3rd round grade until the Senior Bowl. One game is not worth 2 rounds. -Nassib was a 3rd or a 4th round grade at seasons end. What happened between his last game and today that moves him into the bottom of the 1st or the top of the 2nd. Nothing! I like Manuel quite a bit, but his rise up the draft boards scares the ba-jesus out of me. Nassib is non-nonsensical. I think when it comes to any position stick to the film and season. How guys play not their measurements per say
  7. Especially since he would be there in the 2nd. I think that once he falls out of the first his value drops because there are guys with higher upside. Kind of like a Weeden. I think teams (and myself) would rather take a shot on a guy in the 2nd or 3rd on a guy with a higher ceiling. I think a guy like Wilson, Bray, or Glennon is worth a day 2 shot because of their ceiling before Nassib. If Barkley is truly 5th on our big board just behind Nassib, I would guess the FO feels the same. In no particular order they most likely see Geno, Manuel, Glennon, and Wilson above Nassib. I would put Barkley ahead of him as well. People fail to realize that SU had one of the top 20 defenses in the country last year. SU Defense is way better than Usc's, which makes Barkleys result even better and Nassibs worse
  8. This is the smartest post about the issue so far. Also the most correct
  9. This will Blow every bodies mind. OU is actually the University of Oklahoma. Also their state vegetable is the watermelon.
  10. David Nelson, Donald Jones, Andy Levitre, and Chad Reinhart are nowhere near the caliber of player that you just mentioned. I'm not happy with this teams roster at all, but these aren't similar situations at all.
  11. Montana was drafted in the third yes?
  12. The best part is it would cost a 3rd to replace his production...if we are lucky
  13. nobody is taking nassib at 8. get real. hell be there in the 3rd and possibly the 4th. some scouts rate this guy as not even being able to make it as a career backup
  14. i dont like the concept for all sorts of reasons. mostly because it redoes every pick regardless of what actually happened. ie in the redo dareus can't be picked at 13
  15. he has some issues when asked to repeat, communicate, or break down plays. my non-football watching girlfriend answered mooch's questions correctly and quicker than geno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtTs06mfBag
  16. any draft with nassib before the 4th is a waste of a pick and a nightmare as far as I am concerned.
  17. So brooks was in the 4th, which means 2 out of 9 where DB's. There are generally a minimum of 4 DB's on the field at a time (2 safeties and 2 Corners. So about 22% of Nix's top 3 picks are for a position that makes up a minimum of 18% of all 22 players on the field. If we regularly play a 5 DB set, the position takes up almost 23% of the total field. How dare Nix draft proportionally to the number of players at that position on the field.
  18. Only 5 years until Kelsay is in!
  19. I have said I am for drafting a tackle in the first and kicking Glenn inside. I am against signing Clabo to play LT. I only want Glenn inside if it is long term. Signing a vet is not a longterm answer to our line. In a few years we would be back in the same position.
  20. When the pats play the jets or phins I always root for terrorism. I never make the news.
  21. Selecting Glennon in the 2nd or 3rd is the only way I can justify taking a Gaurd in the first. He is too immobile to sit behind what we have
  22. These super mobile QB's are a fad that keeps coming and going in the NFL, which is why Geno and Manuel scare me a little, and why I think a Glennon is worth taking a flier on. I was big on Manuel post Senior Bowl, but after taking a step back, he was rated a 3rd-4th round talent prior to that. The film don't lie. I'm cool with reaching for a QB but none of these in the first. I don't care if they reach for almost any of the top QB's this year in the 2nd.
  23. With all the the criticisms of Geno lately plus his whiteboard with Marriucci scares me. I never played football past high school and could answer answer what mooch was asking. 8 for a Gaurd is pretty high. I understand the thought but don't like it. I don't want to reach for a QB at 8. The more I watch and read the more Glennon/Bray intrigues me. I'd take a gamble on either in the second or third and get a guy to help protect or an outlet in the first. Also this is exactly the kind of pick that Buffalo would blind side is with
×
×
  • Create New...