BuffaloBillsForever

For a guy that banters about "fluidity" and "flexibility" you never mention the consequences or trade-offs. NOT ONCE! For someone that thinks they understand the cap doesn't actually realize and understand the real world ramifications on the football club - present and future.

If you actually read the thread, it was the popular idea to the posters that followed. Not one person really questioned it except for myself who agreed but also mentioned the caveats that come with it. Caveats, trade-offs and the ramifications of being "fluid" and "flexible" is something that has NEVER been mentioned ONCE by the DERANGED one regarding the cap.

It's the only narrative that fans think we are fine with the cap can spin that shows freeing up a decent amount of cap space...but obviously there are major ramifications to that. But those are never mentioned.

It is the original topic of this thread. Go to page one.

I guess you didn't read the original post to this thread.

The most popular ideas are: Cut 6 starters and we have 30-35 million in cap space? Casual fan logic is we are not in cap hell and have lots of cap space now. Reality is you have to sign Glenn and Incognito and replace 6 starters through free agency and the draft. Just restructure Clay. Well first he has to agree to restructure. Second you are pushing a significant higher cap number of Clay when you have to allot money to a pending QB and CB contract which will have MAJOR ramifications on the future cap from 2017 onward. Bills will just get themselves in the same situation they are in now if they make moves like people recommend with Clay.

It's because you don't understand that being "fluid" or "flexible" also comes with ramifications.

Actually it is you that doesn't understand the real world ramifications and trade-offs with the "fluidity of the cap" as you like to call it in cutting and restructuring player contracts.

The site owner of OverTheCap disagrees with you as well.

Wrong. The smart move is to just take the hit this year.

Pushing Clay's money forward is a disastrous idea especially with a pending contract for a QB next year.

Only a delusional fan and someone who doesn't understand the cap (the real world realities) would call the Bills cap situation fine

Spotrac has Bills cap number of top 51 as of today at $158M.

Top 51 contracts with dead money has the Bills cap total right now around $158M.

In about 24 hours it will be time for a Rusty Nail and Better Call Saul.

Chip Kelly, BuffaloBillsForever and Badol are sitting at a table with a bottle of bourbon, smoking a cigar with a big grin on our face.

Yup! That offseason was one for the casuals. Not much for making the Bills a better team.

Champagne! In defeat one needs it.

There should be blame on the front office for acquiring him and giving him an egregious contract raise/extension in guaranteed money.

...and somewhere Chip Kelly is laughing...

Scott Chandler YAC/rec - 2.7 Sammy Watkins YAC/rec - 2.8

The Buffalo News article regarding McCoy is 100% spot on.

McCoy did have a low likeability even before the bar fight.

Neither. I would never pay a RB that money.

I guess you haven't read my previous posts in different threads. I have been the most critical of anyone on this forum regarding McCoy's ridiculous contract since the inception of the trade.