CountDorkula

In the left side of that too drawing you could say the awning covers parts of the 100 level. Right side looks whack. Probably just a bad drawing like a lot have been saying. But again bad drawing is going to get criticism after making people wait several months.

Yes. We’d need a cool name “Blucifer” is something I don’t want to F%*$ with.

Now see these are the important questions. Anyone got Raccuia on speed dial?

The commish makes 44 mil a year. I think I he can afford a few more 4K cameras….. haha

. every new pro stadium seems to be going this way. Tennessee is 60k

Which 30 feet would break that record. Eff it shatter that record. Make them 50 feet tall.

I’m generally curious how big those Buffalos outside the stadium are going to be. From the renderings they look about 30 feet tall

With all due respect we are being told “this is what it is” if you don’t want people to question it maybe out out slightly better drawings and maybe an aerial view of the top? I’ll wait to see more come out but I understand people’s frustration

I think we need some clarification. does the canopy cover 65% of the seats or are 65% if the seats covered, IE like the club/200 level now is covered at Highmark

And that’s actually what Tottenham looks like.

Allegedly it’s going to be like the old aud in terms of steepness and feeling like you are on top of the action. Also to this, if you are going to take this long to release renderings and only put out 2 pictures in which 1 is not that great, you deserve a little heat.

I keep hearing “built for Buffalo” and when I Hear that I can’t help but think, “least amount of cost”

Big ol pile of meh from the renderings.

Wouldn’t you want it the other way around though? I’d prefer White in his first game back not to have to be relied on to cover a top WR. White against a depleted GB team would be ideal to ease him back into the action, IMO. little concerned he’s not game ready yet, (like a 2 out of 10 on the scale) won’t start getting really worried until the next decisions come out. Isn’t there a loop hole where they can activate him for a day and then move him to 4 week IR?

I was drunk and upset during one of the playoff-less years. I signed up to vent, I have no idea why I choose the name I did.

sure thats fine, but his price tag of 12 million suggests he needs to be on the field as much as possible.

I think this is a joke, but i can never tell anymore. Regardless, the 300s of the current stadium are crumbling and will be bordering critical reconstruction by the time the new stadium opens.

"A couple of flashy plays" he says.... right. I assume you also think he and Jake Kumerow are interchangable.

so even Ray Lewis said you are only as good as the line in front of you. Shocking the Bills add bigger bodies up front and now the LBers are allowed to move freely. I like Edmunds and would like to see him remain, but I cant se the Bills affording to be paying him 14-17 Mil a year. Can't pay everyone

changing peoples views left and right. This thread has served its purpose.

still need more than that though. A pass happy offense with 4 healthy WR's is not ideal. Not saying Isabella is a guy that id sign or even think about.

any team at any point could have signed him off the practice squad. I think Mr. Austin is in for a rude awakening. Not many teams looking for an unproductive gadget player.

Or other idea. Lets all Dbs play any position at any time. Poyer and Hyde lined up and corner, White and Jonson at safety. Jackson playing shortstop

Austin is 31 and on his 5th or 6th team. He's averaged 20 yards a game receiving and 34 total YPG in his career. Thinking he's going to come in and be this guy that produces even decent numbers is asking a lot, IMO.

Yea because Tavon Austin has been great everywhere he’s been. also having McKenzie and Austin is redundant. Austin is a lesser McKenzie at this point.