It's in My Blood

Yeah I think they would actually. Offloading a massive contract and a seemingly locker room poison for a QB prospect on a rookie contract. I'd do it if I was the Bears.

Long term, none of the presumed to be available quarterbacks are the answer. We just need a competent field general who can occasionally win us a game. Our defense is championship caliber. We can't waste it on shotty QB play and I doubt management will let that happen. Bring in an established veteran who won't lose us games then draft and groom a long term guy in 2016.

Nope. Keep EJ, dump Orton and sell out for either Bradford, Cutler, or Eli, if any of them are available.

Exceptional, sir, exceptional.

I like Rome. He talks up the Bills and is one of the few national pundits that put the spotlight on the Bills at least a few times every week.

17-3 Bills

If we had a top 10 QB, we're Super Bowl contenders

Right!!!

Good deal...game is on in Ft Lauderdale....for now....

I see a couple of early turnovers, maybe a fumble or two by the pack to allow the Bills to get some points on the board. Bills 27 Packers 21

Anything can happen. Thanks for starting a new thread with this well written break down. (Less work for me

Rename topic...misleading.

I

A friggin' fist bump after the Broncos score? The fix was in fellas.

I want Manuel in

If we can't resign Jerry, I'd like us to bring in Orakpo.

Your disgusting.

In

No it's not too complex. I just think it's more conducive for more dialogue from other users of TSW to not be shackled to a thread that was started two months ago. I love TSW. I'm here everyday, posts or not. Im just sick and tired of people falling back on "in" in response to a members new thought or an attempt to start a discussion without digging and reading through two months of replies.

Mods should. It's stupid. If your not interested in the topic or think your username looks cool to simply post "in", your ass should be banned for a week.

Why are you "in"? Is this topic currently being discussed in another thread? I suggest you use the search feature.

I'm so sick of this "IN" crap,@. In defense of security, although his comments are juvenile and generally stupid, it's a pain in the ass to go through all the posts. I clicked on your link DC Tom and it takes me to October. Should a thought or new development be buried in a thread started in October? I think not. If the cost of starting new threads which are "currently being discussed " is too much, I'd gladly be the first in line to subscribe to TSW. I think based on the number of active members and ads supporting this site, $10.00/month should be more than enough. Please don't take this as anything but trying to improve the experience of TSW, a site I frequent at least once an hour.

I'm so sick of this "IN" crap,@. In defense of security, although his comments are juvenile and generally stupid, it's a pain in the ass to go through all the posts. I clicked on your link DC Tom and it takes me to October. Should a thought or new development be buried in a thread started in October? I think not. If the cost of starting new threads which are "currently being discussed " is too much, I'd gladly be the first in line to subscribe to TSW. I think based on the number of active members and ads supporting this site, $10.00/month should be more than enough.

Look at the top 3 teams in the league over a 10 year span. Their Qbs have been the traditional pocket passers. The game will always have fads and new gimmicks, but it will always revert to Super Bowl teams having that pure, accurate, pocket passer. NFL defenses just evolve to quickly to allow anything different. Top ten QBs over the last 10 years (not in any particular order) : Brady Manning Rodgers Eli Big Ben Brees Rivers Favre Palmer Warner