Mr. WEO

caveat emptor has always applied in any business transaction. Nothing new here. you had an outlier experience. It happens. Might as well start a thread about your ordered food arriving missing an item, or cold

I've never had a problem with them. Blame is on the seller.

Beane's office...

File this under “Mike Florio says NFL is considering expanding to 40 teams”

And this is the edited version…

Not last year

dude just wants to feel what it's like to get to the QB...

he's still a bum so, no.

It would be story nationally for part of a day, locally for a day or two. No firestorm.

The point was that a non charge isn't considered proof of innocence. It means it's a weak case.

I thought that was the Chargers team photo.

So lack of adequate evidence to get a conviction (and therefore charge) is "proof of innocence"? dude.....

Is this really your understanding of how this works? No way!

link? lol I have never said he has been proven guilty--why make attack such an odd straw man? One is found guilty or not guilty (or, in this case liable or not) in court. That's not what you said---"proven innocent" was what you said. Where did that occur?

Ohh, got it. So the comment below was just more jesting...

I have said nothing close to that. I'm asking simple questions. But since you stumbled into the room, where was Araiza "proven innocent"? He wasn't charged. He may, as a result of trial, be proven innocent, but he really hasn't yet. doc said only charged crimes are bad behavior. is that your view too? If so, then you also would have to agree that Watson should not have paid any of his accusers.

The new K tape...

Why did Watson settle if he did not engage in bad behavior?

right?? if only he could hit perpetually wide open Diggs the way he hits his mark in that (no doubt) 1 take commercial shoot!!

Let the grown ups talk.

Only charged crimes are now bad behavior? This is an interesting new concept! What were the charges brought against Watson? I don't see any "smoking gun" coming to light. But that's not what I was asking about. It was what level of detail about this kid and his particular choices are owners going to be comfortable about being attached to this signing. What's their threshold? Any, I guess we'll see.

yes we all know that the NGL excuses bad behavior…from top talent at vital positions. Punter is never on that list. I don’t hope anything either way (stop projecting!). I’m just trying to get you to give a straight answer. You won’t acknowledge even the possibility that something may come out that may turn off a FO

lol...I knew you were dying to say this, and you bit! Anyway, I can't tell if you are pretending to miss the point. The NFL owners aren't on the jury, so his winning this suit against him isn't what they will be watching for. Obviously is he comes off as anything but a choirboy who was forced by a minor to have sex with her against the back of a party house....then they will struggle to justify the signing. If he looks at all sleazy, they may struggle to justify a spot on the roster for him. Punter is the only person other than backup QB than no one wants to see walking onto the field. The best and the worst are separated, on any given kick, by so little that being a special talent at punting isn't worth heat. Your claim that there are a lot of bad ones isn't fact based. The guy at #34 on the list for YPP is yards less than #5. #5 gets 10% more of his punts inside the 20 than #20 in that category.

so she sexually assaulted him, essentially... I'm guessing they are going to dig deeper into his past sexual history, his past history of having sex with underage girls, why he denied on the phone call that he he knew or had sex with her, etc...pretty much anything they want. It won't be a love story that he will be telling his potential future NFL employers while he's on the stand. In the end, it's all a sordid mess---why would any team want to dip into that for an unproven Punter? Oh...that's right, because "he deserves it".

I didnt say his career is over. The Bills certainly didn’t need him If it wa the Jets, you would have laughed at them and commented no further. when deposed, her lawyer won’t be just asking about her allegations of the gang rape.