Magox

I have no problem with that, hell I'm even open to voting for him based on his results. What I'm saying is that he is a world class buffoon, he says the dumbest things we've ever heard from a president, let's just admit that this is one of his many many flaws rather than people constantly embarrassing themselves by attempting to defend by deflecting. He's an idiot, let's just admit it. Not just a blow hard, but he's a moron. A moron in the sense that half the time he speaks, he really has no idea what he's talking about. He constantly is just saying dumb ****, he literally is a know-nothing on a whole host of matters. What he's good at is delegating, which is important. But if you ask him about details about anything, not only does he not know them, but he can't help but pretend like he knows what he's saying, when in reality, he really doesn't know jack ****.

You guys are something else. It's as if we are just picking on poor Trump. It must get tiring having to defend the biggest know-nothing that the US presidency has ever seen. Is this the best you guys can do? That every time Trump says something stupid, which is multiple times a day, deflect on instances when someone else did something stupid? You guys have sold out, to a complete imbecile. Just admit it, he's an idiot. But an idiot you'd rather have as president rather than Hillary or some other Democrat. At least the credibility of many posters on this board who did indeed vote for him would be higher than having to defend his constant idiocies.

I think it's fair to say that Trump is a world class nincompoop. He is in a league of his own, the sheer ignorance and blather that comes out of his mouth is jaw dropping, unless of course you've become immune to his bull ****. I just shrug

Normally I scoff at these sort of suggestions, but everything we've seen from Sammy leads me to believe that he sees himself as a superstar, and who knows he probably could be if he remained healthy and had a really good QB throwing his way. I don't see him signing again with the Bills once he becomes a FA, the only way this happens is if the Bills offer him super star #1 WR money, and I just don't see how the Bills would do that considering his propensity to miss games due to injury. Let's see how he does this year, if he does well we franchise him and try to sign him to a long term deal. If not, I suppose we keep him around another year and then let him walk.

That along with his disastrous presser and the inability to sell himself as the answer to the Pegula's did him in.

Whaley had a decent eye for finding some talent but also had his share of mistakes and ultimately wasn't able to exert himself enough to take control of the team as good GM's are able to do. Selling yourself to the owner's as the man is indeed part of the job, I'm not sure why this fact is lost upon many of you. It's clear that most people haven't worked in an organization in an upper management capacity. A large part of being successful is being able to influence the decision makers to elevate yourself towards a level of increased responsibility and you do that by gaining trust. It's clear to me that Whaley was never able to do that, whereas McD was able to close the deal and gain the trust of Pegs. That's not to say that being able to sell yourself is the determinate in becoming a successful high level executive, but it is without doubt a prerequisite. McD, has impressed many people in the past and has succeeded all the way up to where he is today, my hopes obviously is that he gets the job done. I'm past all the hand wringing but make no mistake, this is his team and there will be no excuses. It is put up or shut up.

Too bad Gilmore wasn't able to figure out that one route.

Yates is no sure thing to make the roster. The odds of him not being on this team are as high as Cardale's and Peterman's

I believe your calculus could be off. There is a reasonable chance that if Peterman and Cardale both play well that Yates would be the one to be cut. If Peterman struggles, he goes to the practice squad. If Cardale struggles he probably gets cut. Yates, you know what you get with him, so I believe the fate of the youngsters is more so in their hands than anyone else's.

I don't know of many teams that expect their 5th round QB selections to be anything more than a backup with an extreme outside shot of becoming a starter.

Peterman wasn't drafted in the first few rounds

But higher than Watson's

Sounds like the next Tom Brady

Yes, I agree. However, why would a corporation employ robotics and advanced automation that reduces the need for functions that humans used to do to only replace it with the same amount of human capital but with higher educated more costly technicians to help run their operations? There may be more of the positions you are talking available in the future but in my opinion the net result will be less jobs. I hope I'm wrong, but I view it as inevitable.

It is impossible to engage in a reasonable argument with anyone that argues from an alternate plane that isn't grounded in reality. Yes, the added amendments to the constitution are just as valid and recognized by the US legislative branch as those words that were written back in 1787.

Considering that Hogan was a pretty decent player, yeah, if he could be even a little bit better than Hogan then I'd be pleased. Anything more than that would be pure gravy.

Immediate Needs: Safety LB WR RT Whoever is the best value at any of those positions

I'm not speaking of a desired outcome but what I believe will end up happening. I don't know what the timeline will be but I don't believe it is unreasonable to believe that within 30 years you will have well over half of the population that either are not employed or doing basic menial tasks due to increased automation, robotics and general advances in technology. That the vast majority of revenues collected by the government will come via corporations. That there will be an increased role from government in assisting humans through various means of subsidization. I could be way off but this is what I believe is in the cards.

As each year passes by and as technology advances, the need for more government in people's lives will only increase. Soon enough, in virtually all developed nations, automation, robotics and general advances in technology will eliminate the need for human capital on a mass macro level. Therefore governments will step in and subsidize people's lives. In my opinion, it is an inevitability we will see this, the question to me is how soon will this happen?

I think they'd wait until next year for this possibility.

My guess, which I've proven to be horrible when it comes to political forecasts would be that the Democrat's best hope of winning would be today. The energy is with them and this dude seems to be very well funded. If he doesn't win it tonight, my guess is that money will pour in for the Repub and there he/she would most likely win in a run off.

I bet you are wrong

I suppose you are into fake news

I don't believe that Spicer is really good at this particular function, Fleischer was excellent and so was Josh Earnest. Both very quick on their feet and represented the president as well as they could have.

It's overblown.