Meark

Why.. no thanks.

No thanks..

Ug.. I used to get harassed by my buddy that's a Green Bay fan. He would send me pictures of Wade with cartoon signs saying.. Where's my headset..

They would trade it..

It's pretty amazing that all of the QB's in this draft are inaccurate, can't throw down field or make the transition to the pro-game. Man.. you guys are so tough you'd never draft anyone.. oh.. until the 5th round maybe? LOL

+1

I roll with my Bills license plate frame in San Diego.. never been pulled over.. but then I drive a 1966 VW Squareback and don't drive too fast.. Oh and whoever my mom gave my 1966 navy blue squareback in Schenectady I want it back.. freaking loved that car.. sigh.. she gave it away without my permission when I moved to So. Cal 20 years ago.. (still bitter LOL)

I'd be totally fine with drafting Spiller.. if only to see some of the posters hang themselves of shoot themselves in the face.

Depressing.. thanks for letting me know it was on.

Spiller is a play maker and looks like he can score every time he touches the ball. I wouldn't be upset if we drafted him. Take an OT at #41 and trade Lynch for a 3rd or 4th round pick. You don't get a chance to draft a player like Spiller often and there is no QB that I would take over him besides maybe Bradford. Is there going to be a sure fire starting LT or NT #9??

Good lord man.. no wonder you have 17k posts.. why don't you post this a few more times dipstick.

This is so freaking ridiculous.

Just say no to Tebow! I'd much rather have Colt who already knows how to throw. The only QB I would take at #9 is Bradford.

Edwards was playing like crap so they switched. That's not really a competition. Fitz is not the man and if he is the starter might as well write off the season. He just doesn't have the tools to be a starting QB. FYI, I found this on Trent for you.. Yes its last off season, but shows he isn't just out playing golf.. http://www.examiner.com/x-5202-San-Jose-Fi...out-and-improve

I'd rather have McCoy.. he already knows how to throw.

He is soft.. one hit and he would break.

LOL.. that's funny!

I'd rather have McCoy..

Bring him back as what? Backup? Don't we have enough backups already? One of the worst QB signings by the Bills of all time and you want him back? Good grief..

I think #9 is all about Spiller. We will either trade #9 to let someone else draft Spiller or we will.

That would be you're vs. your. Otherwise garbo is in possession of an idiot, rather than being one. Sorry.. pet peeve of mine when someone calls someone else an idiot but doesn't know/use the correct words to do so. Carry on!

Stupidest thread ever..

+1 I agree with everything you said.

If you asked me a couple of weeks ago I would have gone ballistic for anyone even suggesting we draft an RB at #9.. However, after watching tape on Spiller I would have no problem with us drafting him at #9. The draft is deep with OT talent and I'd take a OT in round #2. My take.. This is a new coaching staff that wants to run the ball. They have no loyalty to either RB on the roster. Lynch is a trouble maker and needs to be the starter or he isn't very effective. I can easily see us selecting Spiller at #9 and trading Lynch for a mid to late round pick. Then drafting an OT in round 2 and a QB round 3.. They will probably try to grab some D line help in the mid to late rounds.. These guys are just starting out. They want impact players. What better way to make a splash and a statement than to draft Spiller? I'd have to say this is a strong possibility.

So should we put Edwards back there again? No one seems to care about his life.