Jump to content

All_Pro_Bills

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by All_Pro_Bills

  1. The issue with social media platforms is they are censoring and suppressing views that don't align with their personal social or political views which contradicts their code of conduct and service agreements with their customers. And hiding behind special privileges the law grants them as "media" companies. They can block and suspend the accounts of a former President but continue to allow groups like the Taliban and Iran's Revolutionary Guard to post comments and ideas about doing harm to American service personal and other issues. So Facebook and Twitter are on board with the idea of killing American service personnel but not on board with the idea that COVID is of man made origin. I suspect their "fact checkers" don't know more about things than you or I. That's their scam. Fauci is hiding the details of the relationship of the NIH, his bag man EcoHealth, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The idea the virus was engineered and escaped containment by infecting researchers due to insufficient safety protocols seems the most likely based on the evidence. Now its just a matter of time before it all comes out as facts are made public. I believe he's finished and the Biden administration will soon cut him loose to avoid any complicity. Update: And evidence and personal connections continue to be revealed which points to several key players inside the Biden Administration are "compromised" by contracts and associations with the CCP and the Chinese Military. At a minimum they are national security threats. Yet the MSM continues to ignore and brush off this story of the century. Why? What financial connections and associations are they hiding? Climate change? Not sure how we got from here to there. I don't have any disagreement with climate change and the impacts. What I disagree with is the solution. The idea that we are going to electrify all applications and uses of fossil fuels primarily through the use of solar panels, batteries, and wind turbines. All without altering our living arrangements and standards of living while supporting 7+Billion humans as we go merrily into the future on some upward slope of social and technological advancement while consuming more and more energy. The entire idea is a dangerous fantasy. We don't need to hear from politicians and so-called environmental activist. We need to hear from engineers, physicists, and geologists because the resources needed to do this just don't exist on this planet. All the minerals need to be found and mined and processed. For example Lithium mining is water intensive. In places with little water, And fresh water is scarce. Does the mineral even exist in the quantifies necessary? And mining is energy intensive. I say show us the numbers that support this solution because what I see is an unachievable solution that cannot support enough seats in lifeboat-Earth for all those 7 billion people much less support growth and progress in any way. The plan of the Davos climate crowd is more for them and less of us "regular" people on the Earth.
  2. I'll be surprised if Fauci lasts until Friday given some of the developing stories I've seen over the weekend.
  3. I've read a couple stories that the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) over at the Pentagon takes the Lab origin story very seriously. And they've been debriefing a high-level Chinese defector with intimate knowledge of China's biological programs for about two months. The DIA has intentionally kept other US intelligence and law enforcement agencies, specifically the CIA and the FBI, in the dark and out of the loop because they believe both agencies are infiltrated by Chinese government spies. This isn't a left or right issue. This is a threat to our nation. Everyone should be concerned and demanding answers. As for main stream and social media companies I can only hazard to guess how many Chinese agents have infiltrated those businesses and what kind of cash payments and favors provided by the CCP for obedience and assistance are flowing into the pockets of various media people. This demands more investigation and inspection. Which leads me to another potential conclusion that all the Russia hysteria is a intelligence misdirection operation intended to distract everyone from the real problem, which is China. And that distraction has worked extremely well as all the useful idiots picked up and focused on it for almost 5 years. Fortunately, we still have a good number of critical thinkers in the alternative media that continues to ask the right questions which the right people continue to refuse to answer. What are they hiding?
  4. I wonder how the NHL playoff broadcasts from US based arenas is playing in Canada? The Trudeau government still insists on everybody hiding in their basements while Canadian hockey fans witness full arenas for the 2nd round in Las Vegas, Denver, Boston, New York, Carolina and Tampa. And lots of empty seats in Winnipeg and Montreal. The optics must be playing badly. And how will Canadian customs handle the "dangerous" cross border transits of players that in the next round?
  5. As the Antifa are stuck at the intellectual and social evolutionary level of trying to rub two sticks together to start the Portland Federal Court House on fire it appears doubtful they've developed the capability of grater than light speed inter-stellar space travel along with the ability to manipulate space and time. So I'd say that UFO theory is debunked. If they had such "skills" it seems logical they would have real lives and aspire to some higher level of purpose rather than playing the part of street level political anarchists losers.
  6. What intelligence is that? He immediately closed travel from China and right on queue the virtue signaling a-holes in the MSM labelled him a racist. Turns out China was stockpiling and buying all kinds of PPE from all over the world as early as November 2019. A major reason we had a shortage. What intelligence picked up on that? Those agencies were too busy spying on US citizens and concocting treasonous plots against a sitting President to worry about China.
  7. That's pretty much the plot here. For me the lab leak scenario made the most sense from day one and I believed it way back March 2020. Firstly, what a coincidence a viral pandemic starts in a location with a viral research lab with a reputation for safety protocol issues. Chinese scientists advocating for the lab leak suddenly disappearing and never heard from again. RNA insert analysis posted by scientists, efficiency in attaching to humans, facts almost everyone choose to ignore, many virologists and researchers casting doubt this virus could have been a natural mutation. But I got roasted on forums where I posted my support of that theory by idiots who can't develop a connect the dots conclusion based on a series of facts. People who believe all the crap anybody with some official title is shoveling without taking into account their personal or professional interests or motives. Fast forward to present day and the Lab leak is still a theory but so is the natural mutation scenario. At this point I expect we'll never know for certain. And the market where the bat virus is alleged to have originated was conveniently plowed under by the Chinese government almost immediately. Nothing looks more suspicious than cleaning the crime scene before the investigation. But assuming the Wuhan Lab is the source of the pandemic its safe to say the US government and the Chinese government both know this to be true at this time. Both have an interest in keeping the story quiet and to push the natural mutation narrative. Simply because if the virus escaped from the lab by infecting workers at the lab due to lax containment and safety protocols then both governments would need to take actions that neither wanted to take. China doesn't want to admit it and take responsibility for all the deaths and illnesses. And there are other consequences that can come to bear beyond that like economic and political shunning and isolation. And the US doesn't want to be in a position where they are "forced" to take punitive measures against China at this point in time as failure to take some actions would be a disaster for our government and political leaders. Such is the life of the "nothing to see here" narrative
  8. Typically a plea deal means the governments case is weak. I wouldn't get too excited..
  9. How shocking! Right? The liberals don't care about crime against people and property. Unless the people are them and the property is theirs. The reason they want to "defund" police is because it is one of the last remaining public institutions that they have not fully infiltrated and controlled. And as they will likely never be successful at doing that then eliminating or minimizing their influence is the next best thing. While liberals have the capacity to infiltrate lots of areas its just not in their DNA to take on the jobs like police or enlisted soldiers in the military. But the blow back on this strategy is increasing. Residents of inner city communities are against reducing police presence in their communities by close to a 3 to 1 margin. And the awareness is spreading that their hardships are being used by others to gain political points and not so much to address the plight of those in poverty and under-served communities. The belief that liberal elites really care about under-served communities and minority rights is "The Big Lie". With homicides on schedule to hit all time records in most large cities I think the 2022 Federal, State, and Local election slogan "Make Crime Illegal Again" might be a winner.
  10. Because the left doesn't seek "equal treatment". The left seeks punishment and retribution for real and imagined past disparities. That and Joe Biden is a figurehead President who has lost his mind from the effects of aging and mental degenerative conditions and is only coherent for about 2 hours a day when pumped up on medications.
  11. Trump couldn't fire Fauci. The Waterboy told us Mama thinks Fauci's The Devil!
  12. Leftist aren't required to provide any facts or proof of anything by the media. As the media are leftist they just parrot everything back-and-forth. I'm still waiting for them to produce a list of 100's of conspirators that are in jail for Russian collusion. DHS can issue warnings about UFO's planning to disrupt your picnic if they'd like. How nice to have a job that allows you to act without facts or real information. But here it is. Does anyone believe this crap anymore? I think not. "White Supremacist" is leftist code for any group that opposes their political agenda and which they believe poses a threat to the government's ability to impose more limitations on individual freedom. These conservative groups are not a direct threat to African-Americans as a group. They are not mutually exclusive in terms of membership. Conservative, Libertarian, or "right" groups have membership from all races. There are conservatives and patriots of all races, not just whites. Leftists are only concerned with criminalizing political opposition to their polices. They are not concerned with law-and-order or crime against people or property. In fact they have no concern for the well-being of African-Americans either. Or any other particular race. Or you or your property. They are simply exploiting the suffering or conditions others people face as a vehicle and front to execute their agenda. Which is to eliminate political opposition to their power grabs. If they had any genuine interest in the plight of African-Americans then after 60 years of programs and policies they enacted we wouldn't be having the same conversations we did in the mid 1960's. Leftists love symbols and pictures as it dumbs-down their positions to a level their simpleton members can understand. That's why they always post pictures or tweets from some propaganda source to your posts rather than form some cohesive argument. They can't write more than two sentences because their positions are generally illogical and the more you write the more you have to think. And thinking for yourself is discouraged in leftist circles. Copy/paste works best for them.
  13. Since when is the left concerned with supporting America. They are anti-American cowards..
  14. I suggest they initially target white liberals supporting all kinds of race hustles and other cultural fantasies. For a lot of reasons they will be the easiest targets to neutralize.
  15. Would you expect her to talk about honor, duty, country, sacrifice, commitment, freedom, patriotism? Such words would drive her threatened woke constituents running to their safe spaces.
  16. You got it backwards. Government cannot survive without free enterprise and private citizens working and cooperating to produce what a society needs. I think we've identified the fundamental flaw in your thought process.
  17. Here's the dirty little secret the libs don't want to talk about. Reality is the people they hate and ridicule are the people that fight for the freedoms and protections that provide them the privilege to be able to sit back and piss and moan about all kinds of injustices and problems. Think about that every time you get one of those lame ass replies. And Happy Memorial Day to the vets here!
  18. I think you're on the right track here. It doesn't make any sense to view a country as the number one threat to your security and then turn around and send them 100's of billions of dollars in trade every year. Maybe the first thing to do rather than some knee jerk spending spree is to make sure you've got some systemic plan in place that lines everything up pointed in the right direction. A problem with the don't buy any Chinese goods approach is the shelves in stores like Walmart would be almost empty. And things like medications and drugs depend on materials and manufacturing sourced from China. But all this didn't happen overnight. It happened over 30 years of corporations and the Chinese government of systematically stripping all the productive capacity out of the US economy and moving it offshore. To places like China. And it didn't happen by accident either. It all happened by design. One big thing to do is get a read from all the S&P 500 companies on where their allegiances are here? Are they with America? Or are they with China? Or most likely they're just in it for the money. Want to start somewhere. Force these firms to pick a side and act to demonstrate that pick. Are they with us or against us?
  19. The vote is proof they understand a Congressional "commission" would be political theater. Plain and simple. The investigation is best handled by the DOJ and DC prosecutors with the court system used to facilitate all legal proceedings. Congress by nature is a partisan body. To suggest the Democrats would not take advantage of such an opportunity to discredit their political opposition is absurd. The idea they're seeking some "truth" is a fantasy. They've demonstrated this through the entire Trump administration and basically proved nothing. If the shoe was on the other foot the Republicans would do the same and the Democrats would be balking at the idea of a commission. A lot of times politics is governed by the saying "where you stand depends on where you sit". This is one of those times. Also to suggest that journalists will do some "investigation" is not likely. Our media doesn't investigate anything. They're provided some established narratives and suggest anyone or anything that disagrees is debunked or conspiracy. They are nothing more than mouthpieces for the State. If Watergate occurred today Woodward and Bernstein would have been shoved out of the newsroom for daring to challenge and investigate the establishment. They have less credibility than Congress. Which is hard to do.
  20. A divorce which may have some cause/effect connection to his relationship with the deceased sex trafficker and Mossad operative Jeffery Epstein. Maybe we find out more with the Maxwell trial unless potentially implicated acquaintances can kill her too.
  21. Recently my organization entered into a contractual arrangement with another firm on a specific project. The project manager of the other firm used to work in my organization. I know them well both professionally and personally. Even though their employment history with our company is fairly common knowledge I was compelled to file a conflict of interest disclosure. This describes the nature of the conflict and the plan to mitigate and address any potential situation where this conflict of interest might exist. That is the major issue with these "reporters" and "commentators". They have a lot of conflicts of interest either disclosed or undisclosed. Like the networks employing commentators like the director of national security, or the CIA, or the NSA, or some other agency. They quite simply cannot be and are not completely objective when the need might arises to be critical of some act committed by some group inside the intelligence community. Which brings me to my main point. Almost nobody in the media does any kind of investigation. When investigating crimes and improprieties it is critical to examine relationships and connections between victims and perpetrators in many aspects. But our current rendition of the free press is given the narrative and they run with it. One of the main tools of investigative journalism is uncovering and finding personal and professional relationships that exist in the area your investigating. That's a logical way to get to all the facts and connections, connect the dots, and uncover the truth. I go back to the Wuhan Lab theory that the official narrative called "debunked". But some facts are that the NIH had contracted the Wuhan Lab to the tune of $3+M to perform some research. Using an intermediary "bag man" company, EcoHealth. This isn't a secret. This I suspect to avoid things like disclosure and freedom of information requests as private contractors are exempt (lots of government organizations use this approach to hide things from disclosure). The NIH owes the public an explanation. So far they have been silent. And independent press would turn up the heat on them to do so. So far the press has acted like their main concern is to see this story go away. Its also not a secret that WHO contracted the very same EcoHealth to assist in performing their investigation of the lab. Guess what they found? So why didn't EcoHealth either decline the WHO contact because of a conflict of interest, investigating an organization and facility where they had a large financial interest and role, or simply clearly disclosing that conflict of interest? Why did WHO hire them knowing this? And why didn't the networks with so many resources and reporters "out" this arrangement? And why did independent investigative journalists that did report on the arrangement get shut down? As you said the media is the DNC. How can we expect people telling us the "news" to be fair and objective when they have so many disclosed and in most cases undisclosed conflicts of interest? These are not run of the mill political party members we might meet and discuss things with over drinks in some local bar. These are high-level activists in a political party with its own interests that clearly conflict with the public interest maintaining a free press. While there are abuses of this in other political philosophies the conflict of interests between the DNC and a free Press is systemic. If you look at dictatorships one of the first and critical things they do is bring all press and media under the control of some ministry or department they control. We're on that path but we can't allow that to happen.
  22. A problem is that in the public sector (government and education) the mechanisms for scientific inquiry, expression of professional opinion, debate over conflicting and inconsistent "facts" and "data", have been disabled and inhibited by political agendas. Social media platforms classifying anything that disagrees with a particular conclusion as "misinformation" or "debunked". MSM media outlets doing the same. Like the recent public awakening of the lab origin theory. The media got it wrong from day one and dug in their heels. This theory has always been plausible. And you can bet your ass the media won't be issuing any apologizes and double bet your ass they won't be saying Trump was right. It may be as simple as they all balked at the theory because Trump suggested the possibility. And it presented another bashing opportunity to label him racist and xenophobic. And they'd rather start themselves on fire in the middle of the street than admit he was right about anything. Or maybe they're all on the CCP payroll in some fashion? Another theory concerning the CDC is the organizational intelligence of the agency has been dumbed down to the point of systemic incompetence by decades of diversity and preference hiring. But a deep-dive on that one might belong on another topic board.
  23. Pretty much it. Pick almost any current topic. In this case all the a-holes were insisting the lab theory was "debunked", when it wasn't, In reality, it was suppressed and fact-based scientific discussions of potential scenarios were ignored and censored. What is clear as day is these social media and main stream media organizations have no interest in the truth. And they fear open and intelligent conversation and debate. But other than suppressing opposing narratives what their end game? And who are the working for? Looks like they're working for China. There needs to be a national intelligence investigation into how and why China yields so much influence with social media and MSM. Is it the money? Or some other allegiance? Perhaps they are the real insurrection? And all else is just distraction?
  24. Guilty? Isn't that for the courts to decide? Did I miss the convictions? Did you run your own personal investigation? And yes, I will ignore your posts from this point forward and thank you for that advice..
×
×
  • Create New...