LeviF

Not when the riots are regime-sanctioned violence and those who defend themselves are charged with murder against every bit of common and written law ever produced by this civilization. You start with the false premise that the two groups you mentioned are equal under the eyes of current US law:

Her grandfather spent nearly two decades in Congress. Her husband ran talent acquisition for the Clinton campaign and is currently the managing director of one of those NYC-based businesses that doesn't even state what it does on its website because you're too poor to know that. I don't feel bad for her.

And had a decent family resort. I had the time of my life there.

In NY they ID for those kinds of magazines.

What

Back when I worked at Macy’s, we had some absolutely shameless return attempts come through. My personal favorites were the 20 year old pots and pans that were starting to lose their nonstick or had discolored. I remember one particularly egregious one went to my coworker and he did his best to explain why it was ridiculous for her to try and return it: not only was it clearly well-used for a number of years but the brand had been defunct for over a decade and was never carried by Macy’s. So the rigmarole is gone through and eventually a manager strolls on by and asks what the commotion was. To make a long story longer, he eventually asks her how much she paid for the item, punches in his manager code, and processes a no bar code return for store credit. After that I just decided I was going to be the hero for people and process their return any way I could. At least that way maybe one of them would use the survey and say how amazing I was and I’d get a gift card for “going above and beyond.”

Oh no can’t make 12 year olds accessing porn as easy as clicking “yes I’m 18” oh nooooooooo

If the colleges involved or the dissenting justices could have come up with anything but half-hearted legal theory that the Court had rejected decades ago, maybe their case could have been made.

He believes that "Christian nationalists" are simply another side of "wokism," which he opposes. He also believes that "normal" Christians (that is, not "Christian nationalists"), are some of the last people who believe as a group in classical liberalism as demonstrated by the founders and other enlightenment-inspired thinkers, as he does. So he considers normal conservative Christians political allies. Thus the dog.

Oh this is delicious.

Lindsay is an atheist, and an outspoken critic of Christian nationalism. Google is hard, so I'm going to assume basic reasoning is hard too. Whoever wrote that little blurb at the SPLC certainly googled Lindsay, and absolutely viewed his Twitter page, both of which would tell you in pretty short order that not only is Lindsay an atheist and a critic of Christian nationalism, but has publicly debated Christian nationalists on the topic. So this is not simply a mistake of fact or guilt by association, but an outright lie. So the question, then, is if the SPLC is willing to lie about James Lindsay and about what he believes, who and what else are they willing to lie about and how many times has it happened?

I don’t personally know any Christian nationalists. I wouldn’t know. It has nothing to do with what I said.

lol, this one kind of gives the game away, don’t you think? SPLC is fake news, if one even wants to call the drivel it produces “news” in any sense of the word.

Medical emergency, hit your head, imbibe too much, get murdered, or some combination of the above. I’m sure if we put our minds to it we could figure out a bunch of ways.

I'm aware lol - I guess I should have made a complete sentence

Inspiration?

I assume this is a professional conference and you need a few suits. Try Bureau on Elmwood.

WRs, TEs, and RBs are considered, the list is by team.

The chilling faces of white supremacy.

If you renew or apply for a registration at your county DMV office rather than online the county gets a cut of the fees.

A rare musical stain on the city.

If the CEO was willing to fire people for pointing out safety issues he’s probably willing to conceal the risk from his clients.

NSFW (language)

Yeah it's interesting to me who we mock and who we don't when FAFO things happen. Even if we accept the premise that these folks are stupid and entitled they're still far less worthy of mockery than certain individuals in the last several years who had highly-publicized deaths and were instead rewarded with ivory or gold caskets and thousands of public mourners. Then of course there's the war porn constantly strewn about the internet over the last year; people clapping like seals over men being turned into ground meat on thermal cameras.