Cookiemonster

Haven't read many of the posts yet, but you had me at the topic, when I read it, it was like that we be just our dumb luck, and it's bound to happen, or should I say, not happen. Of course that would be one way to keep the team in Buffalo. We should just prop him up like the weekend at Bernie's guy, I think we could get away with it for a couple of seasons, he's not very visible latley anyhow, and he has already been inducted into the hall, I don't think anybody will miss him.

I guess we would have had to face one more time anyway, unless they traded to someone else, it really doesn't matter, we aren't going anywhere any how, just tired of him abusing our defense(s), and glad to see him go. It was a belive a stupid post, but I have already fallen on my sword.

My bad, well one more time!

Geez, with Randy treating our secondary like his own personal biatches, and now we still have to face him one more time. On a positive note, we won't have to face him at all next year, maybe never again. Not sorry to see him go, and I belive that this will hurt the Pats, maybe not against us,and maybe not long term, but at least for a couple of more years, they WILL miss him!

A truckload full of roids is not going to make him any more productive, he is what he is, and he is what a lot of us thought he was. A bust.

I agree, sounds like the plan is being developed as we progress through time, as opposed to there being a plan and executing it.The thing that also baffles me a bit, is that, unless I am mistaken the trade deadline is still a couple of weeks away, and there are still teams out there with running back troubles like GB, and Philly lost a back as well this past weekend, why not showcase him a little more and drive the value up, it seems like a risk worth taking to lose a fourth round pick, or maybe we would have still been able to swing the trade with Seatle at the deadline.

Maybe if we was nicer, you would have let us win right? "Opulence, I has it"

Figuring, he knew that he would never get another crack at starting for the Bills, where as maybe he figured that another team might eventually give him that chance, just sayin.

Funny, I had you pegged as graduatin all the way plum through 8th grade! BTW, where did you get your Avatar, looks like a mug shot after a heavy night of drinking and a DUI

But...But...what if we win the Super Bowl, ok, let's not go there again.

Next time that you know that the fans are going to suit up and play, could you let me know, I wouldn't want to miss that.

There fixed!

Even up? or should we make them throw in a future early round draft pick?

Great, now we have a roster spot to sign Joieke......aw ****!

Gotta agree, what other game have you seen a spot challenged and overturned, yet there eyes were good enough to spot the fact Fitzpatrick was just a little short on his first down run, I mean, both plays were challenged, on one we get the benefit of the call on the field being 1rst down, it gets challenged and overturned, yet when the call on the field states that the Pats were short on their first down attempt, it gets challenged and overturned in favor of a first down for them. So I guess on both plays, there was indisputable physical evidence that both calls get reversed, give me a break. Man, they see 20/20 on replays, possibly even better than that, yet can never get the call right the first time. Replay is a joke, just another manipulative tactic. Not really questioning whether or not correct calls were eventually made, they quite possibly could have been, it just seemed strange to me. Another thing, early in the game Fitz got pressure right up the middle by one of their lineman, who proceeded to hit him with his arms held high, and around the head area, no one can convince me that that would not have been roughing the passer had we done this to Marsha.

We would have to have, pardon the pun, some Dumb Luck for that to happen!

Big Cat, my how you have changed, no problem, this is a chat site, but you sir, are full of it. You can't actually sit there and say that Belicheat would have kicked a field goal there, not with a straight face at least.And my point is, if you are gonna have the gonads to try on on-side kick in that situation, then have them to go for a 4th and 1

Amswer the question Big Cat, what would Belicheat have done?

I was surprised, and it did catch them off guard, just couldn't capitalize on it, not sure it was the right call though, even with the element of surprise. We did stop them, so in esseccense it didn't hurt, I would have kicked off and got as much yardage back from the penalty possibble. I think a better move, would have been to go for it on 4th an one, instead of kicking the field goal earlier in the game, what do you think that Belicheat would have done there?

They are still causing you pain, aren't they?

Nice job, very well thought out and written.

Ya know tbone, I have an issue with you Avatar, why don't you show one where you are actually pumping that weight. It's like you are perpetually prepared to pump, but are never quite pumping. I mean geez, there must be a whole 20 lb.s on that bar!

Awe, that's ok, not everone can have glasses like mine. Seriously though, i see and read all of the negative stuff, winning will make it all better.

You are totally, IMO, correct sir, let me ask you this, do you agree with my assessment regarding Ben most likely being able to allude this? If you do, then why the hell can't Trent? Are you trying to tell me that you feel that Trent has this awareness that I am alluding to? I will grant you that Ben is a pretty tough standard to measure against, but most of the other decent QB's have this, and , IMO, Trent does not. That combined with his inability to forget about the last play, and his playing scared, and I don't know how anybody can't see, that this is the right move. This one play might not be the best example, although I feel that it is a perfect example of his lack of awareness, there are many, many other plays, where his lack of awaremnness is very apparent. Good QB's make lemonade out of lemons.

OK, I am gonna take a shot here,our OL is bad, or at least not good, granted, but a good QB can hide a lot of an OL's deficencies. One glaring example of this was evident on the play agaimnst GB, where Trent fakes a hand-off to the left and does a naked bootleg to the right, and runs smack into Clay Mathhews. You could see as the play developed, that he had no clue as to the impending doom that was about to consume him. Ben Rothlisberger, (and I realize that this a tough comparison), would not only have ben aware of Matthews, but would have made a move to allude him as well, or would have just shrugged him off, and either got rid of it out of bounds, or most likely even completed it. I am not asking for Trent to suddenly morph into Big Ben, but he has absolutley no packet awareness at all, zero. Time to move on.