SDS

I know what you are saying, but any new teams are going to look in the same places as the old ones. I wouldn't expect to many Sam Gado's to be found.

i don't think there are enough players now. I would like to see contraction in all the leagues personally.

I do not believe there are 53 NFL caliber players out there that are going to fill an expansion roster. Your examples do not apply. For the most part these 52 players will probably old vets hanging on one more year and guys that would have been on the practice squad.

WMP works on my iMac... great MS wants us to use F4M and it doesn't work.

considering quicktime is cross platform, I don't understand why anyone wouldn't use it to stream.

Jeff, I can't get it to work on my iBook. I'm using the FLip4Mac plugin. any suggestions?

That's what we need... 53 players that aren't good enough to be in the NFL now will suddenly be "good enough".

I prefer to have it rotated through every NFL city. Maybe some fans would actually get to see the game instead of Hollywood types...

that's a function of Maxim... The pictures there do look pretty clownish at times.

I would call that deep throating... it is New England afterall.

So maybe we got a nugget of gold wrapped in a stojan sandwich. This time next year, no one will care and my guess is that he will headline (unless Irvin trumps him ).

on the flip side, he could go in next year as the headliner and not a side show as he would have been these past two elections...

So, are the voters idiots or smart? Are they idiots today for not voting in TT, but smart yesterday when they voted in Levy? IMO, they are idiots, regardless of their votes today or yesterday.

I know the purpose of sarcasm, but this was a bad time to use it IMO, since there are no threads dealing with NC and the cover 2. I assume you are alluding to the LM thread, yet there is little discussion in there about Nate, so I don't even know where the basis is for your 1st post. Now, I suppose he could attempt to hijack KtD's thread about Milloy and turn it into a thread about Nate. Perhaps you think that is a better solution? Do you think people wanting to read about Nate would naturally search in a thread that is specifically about Lawyer? Does KtD, who asked about LM and not the "secondary" in general, mind that someone is trying to take his thread in a different direction? I looked through 4 pages of posts before I made my comments, so it wasn't obvious to me that the natural place to talk about Nate Clements is in thread about Lawyer Milloy.

the problem is that the Houston Oilers had some very, very talented teams. A lack of supporting cast for at least a portion of his career shouldn't be an issue.

it is named that out of respect to the AFL/NFL, not because of the CFL.

If you could point me to "KtD's Nate thread" - that would be great. I see a moderate sized thread dealing with Lawyer Milloy and his position in the cover 2 and after scannning it, Nate Clements is barely mentioned.

I wouldn't want ANY employee who would jump ship like that after making a commitment to provide his services. Once you say "yes", you are on the hook as far as I am concerned.

Isn't this getting a tad petty? We have a poster that wants to talk about a legitimate Bills topic. If it is being discussed elsewhere - why not provide him a link? I'm sure he would be appreciative of the kind gesture, it would cut off this thread from becoming a duplicate discussion, and as a bonus you get your message across in a more helpful and less snotty way.

It will also be carried live on NFL Network, ESPNews, and SuperBowl.com.

nm

"you hittin' that?"

At least you're not rubbing it in...

I couldn't be that ugly if I tried...

A pet peeve of many is the lack of descriptive information in a subject line. Haloti Ngata cutler High character-lol Jamal Lewis are examples of bad subject lines. Please be more descriptive when starting a new thread. Thank you.