NewEra Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 maybe flip flop hangartner and woods or possible walker and chambers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostsOfTheRockpile Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Judging by what they did without Peters last year to start the season, I'm guessing: LT - Walker LG - Hangartner C - Wood RG - Butler RT - Chambers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan Trapped in Pats Land Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I like it. Pretty athletic group of versatile linemen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsguy Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Judging by what they did without Peters last year to start the season, I'm guessing: LT LG C RG RT Walker Hangartner Wood Butler Chambers Sounds like 7-9 again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Yes! Aren't you? 2 major needs addressed with 1st round picks in a year considered by most experst as great! If Schoebel returns to form and Maybin flies in from the other side, Poz should see the pro bowl. Wood should give us a very solid decade. I'm getting 'wood' thinking about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHFO Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Sounds like 7-9 again. are you kidding...that line is better than last year's just by having a legit C now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillnutinHouston Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Interesting that they select a C with the 28th pick when Hangartner stated C was his best position. I guess they feel Hangartner can play well at LG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostsOfTheRockpile Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 The only name that matters is EDWARDS. That line is good enough to win. Its all about Trent getting consistent, getting better. Like Steve Young told Keyshawn, "this isn't a quarterback DRIVEN league, its a quarterback league. Period." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ax4782 Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I think that line up is good, but I would like the Bills to draft a OT when they pick in the second if William Beatty or Eben Britton are still available. At that point I think they are more value than a reach. Then Chambers can be a backup at LT or RT and we can move Walker over to LT. That would give us a line of Walker-Hangartner-Wood-Butler-Beatty. That would be a very solid line up. The line up stated is an serious upgrade from last year, but could be that much better if we picked up a solid OT in the second round. I think we can get a good TE in the third or fourth round so that's not much of an issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluv Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Judging by what they did without Peters last year to start the season, I'm guessing: LT - Walker LG - Hangartner C - Wood RG - Butler RT - Chambers I like Chambers or even Bell better at LT than Walker. While I haven't seen Bell play, I have seen Wlaker and I say leave Walker where he is at! He is a good RT but I don't think he can consistently handle speed rushers he may face at LT. Thate initial posters lineup looks Ok on paper - would look damn good with Peters manning the LT but I'm going to move forward and just like the Bills should handle Walker - leave that alone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 are you kidding...that line is better than last year's just by having a legit C now agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bufcomments Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 Walker is better suited for RT , leave him paired with Bulter the right side was better than the left side last year IMO they are Building the lines AND ITS ABOUT TIME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted April 25, 2009 Share Posted April 25, 2009 I think that line up is good, but I would like the Bills to draft a OT when they pick in the second if William Beatty or Eben Britton are still available. At that point I think they are more value than a reach. Then Chambers can be a backup at LT or RT and we can move Walker over to LT. That would give us a line of Walker-Hangartner-Wood-Butler-Beatty. That would be a very solid line up. The line up stated is an serious upgrade from last year, but could be that much better if we picked up a solid OT in the second round. I think we can get a good TE in the third or fourth round so that's not much of an issue. Definitely like to see another OL at 42. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted April 25, 2009 Author Share Posted April 25, 2009 The only name that matters is EDWARDS. That line is good enough to win. Its all about Trent STAYING HEALTHY, getting better. Like Steve Young told Keyshawn, "this isn't a quarterback DRIVEN league, its a quarterback league. Period." FIXED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts