Alaska Darin Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Thailog80 said: Both scare the Bejesus out of me anyways. 87956[/snapback] The remote, so I could miss the agony.
Cugalabanza Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 I always hated these "would you rather chew your own arm off or french kiss your grandma" type questions. ...so I didn't even vote.
KD in CA Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 who would I rather have doing what? ordering the pizza?
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 gringo starr said: I always hated these "would you rather chew your own arm off or french kiss your grandma" type questions. ...so I didn't even vote. 87961[/snapback] chew off my own arm. I picked Lindell. Drew is honestly done. Like when were inside the 10 last week and he TOOK OFF AS IF HE COULD ACTUALLY RUN!! Even the annoucer said "he had plenty of time to stay in the pockert... maybe 2 or 3 more seconds!!!" AHHHHHHHH!
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Author Posted October 27, 2004 KD in CT said: who would I rather have doing what? ordering the pizza? 87963[/snapback] If the Bills had one chance to score late...who would you rather see trying to win the game.
_BiB_ Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Thailog80 said: If the Bills had one chance to score late...who would you rather see trying to win the game. 87972[/snapback] Moorman.
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 It's sad that I really cannot give you an honest answer to this question. I don't know.
KD in CA Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Thailog80 said: If the Bills had one chance to score late...who would you rather see trying to win the game. 87972[/snapback] yard line? time left on the clock?
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Author Posted October 27, 2004 KD in CT said: yard line? time left on the clock? 87989[/snapback] 35 with 0:08 on the clock...no TO's
KD in CA Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Thailog80 said: 35 with 0:08 on the clock...no TO's 87991[/snapback] grass or turf? weather? tailwind or headwind? mph?
Thailog80 Posted October 27, 2004 Author Posted October 27, 2004 KD in CT said: grass or turf? weather? tailwind or headwind? mph? 87995[/snapback] Fug it you ****.
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Thailog80 said: 35 with 0:08 on the clock...no TO's 87991[/snapback] 0:08 on the clock? Well, 52 yards is a long field goal, but i think he could hit 20% of them or more. 8 seconds with this offense would give us NO chance of 2 plays (sadly). And, we cant risk the sack. In this scenario, I kick the low-percentage FG.
Like A Mofo Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Thailog80 said: If the Bills had one chance to score late...who would you rather see trying to win the game. 87972[/snapback] Lindell, no questions asked. And thats not a ringing endorsement from me about Lindell either.
KD in CA Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Thailog80 said: Fug it you ****. 88001[/snapback] well, i can't argue with that!
Beerball Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Thailog80 said: Fug it you ****. 88001[/snapback] In that case it's got to be Lindell.
stevestojan Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 Lindell - 80% chance of missing the kick. Bledsoe - 90-95% chance of getting sacked (not exaggerating) Yes, I would go with Lindell.
WILLIS Posted October 27, 2004 Posted October 27, 2004 _BiB_ said: Moorman. 87981[/snapback] first thought that popped into my head also...
Recommended Posts