Jump to content

Powell


Recommended Posts

Is THAT the "Powell Doctrine"?

 

That's the stupidest thing I ever heard. Everyone else in history calls that "common sense". Only in America would we have to doctrinize it. :lol:

Thats right

"Powell beleives in using overwhelming force ,once the troops are commited ,as Powell also stated in the Powell doctrine"

It came out about during the Viet Nam war

I guess it was doctrinized because the politicians do not seem aware of it or it least the ones that were not in the military

Did ya ever see a politician with "comon sense"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You were one of those smart guys I was talking about if I recall correctly, who were against the war for solid, intelligent, logical reasons even though you saw the appeal of it.

 

"Appeal" is probably the wrong word. I believed at the time, and still do in hindsight, that there were valid reasons to remove Saddam Hussein from power, but the war as developed and executed was an execrable mistake and basically immoral action that shouldn't have been undertaken, regardless of the veracity of the intelligence (which is a key point everyone forgets...were the reasons for war given sufficient even if completely true and accurate?)

 

But war never "appeals" to me. Another of the big problems I had back in '02...there seemed to be almost a "boys with toys" mentality within the administration with respect to the military after invading Afghanistan. Too much willingness (if not eagerness), not enough "people will die, this is gonna suck" awareness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Appeal" is probably the wrong word. I believed at the time, and still do in hindsight, that there were valid reasons to remove Saddam Hussein from power, but the war as developed and executed was an execrable mistake and basically immoral action that shouldn't have been undertaken, regardless of the veracity of the intelligence (which is a key point everyone forgets...were the reasons for war given sufficient even if completely true and accurate?)

 

But war never "appeals" to me. Another of the big problems I had back in '02...there seemed to be almost a "boys with toys" mentality within the administration with respect to the military after invading Afghanistan. Too much willingness (if not eagerness), not enough "people will die, this is gonna suck" awareness.

Good answer. You're right, "appeal" was the wrong word.

 

Two other things that people tend to forget was the "liberal media" being suck-asses and proponents for the war, which made it easy for the right to paint any left leaning politician into being Un-American or unpatriotic. I actually think that a significant portion of the fawning over Obama that the press is doing is a conscious or unconscious making up for that global error of judgment. Plus we tend to forget the gutless left for not sticking up for what they actually believed. I understand why they did it, they were scared to, but this was a war. What a lot of Democrats did by not actually being for the war but not sticking up for themselves in public was pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats right

"Powell beleives in using overwhelming force ,once the troops are commited ,as Powell also stated in the Powell doctrine"

It came out about during the Viet Nam war

I guess it was doctrinized because the politicians do not seem aware of it or it least the ones that were not in the military

Did ya ever see a politician with "comon sense"

 

Subodai believed it to. May as well call it the "Mongolian Doctrine". Or even the "Pericles Doctrine". Only Americans would be arrogant enough to think they invented the concept of winning wars by fighting them.

 

But then, it makes more sense than the French doctrinalizing "Raise your hands in surrender." :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good answer. You're right, "appeal" was the wrong word.

 

Two other things that people tend to forget was the "liberal media" being suck-asses and proponents for the war, which made it easy for the right to paint any left leaning politician into being Un-American or unpatriotic. I actually think that a significant portion of the fawning over Obama that the press is doing is a conscious or unconscious making up for that global error or judgment. Plus we tend to forget the gutless left for not sticking up for what they actually believed. I understand why they did it, they were scared to, but this was a war. What a lot of Democrats did by not actually being for the war but not sticking up for themselves in public was pathetic.

 

One of the things I respect about Lieberman is that he's unapologetic about supporting the war. I disagree with him...but given the same info, coming to a different judgement, and standing by it, okay I can at least respect that. Contrast that to Kerry's ridiculous "I voted for it before I voted against it" weaseling, or Biden's preternaturally stupid "Yeah, I voted to authorize the use of military force, but I didn't think the President would actually do it..." (That makes you the only one in the country unaware, Joe.) Again, while I don't like Bush, one of the things I can respect about him is that you know where he stands. He's an idiot, but he doesn't try to weasel out of being an idiot.

 

The press...likes war. Always did. Again...the press is biased towards the salacious, and war is in a way salacious. War sells. Complaints about the press not doing their job I find laughable...the press's job is to sell ad space, not watch out for us. "Remember the Maine"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROTFLMAO!

 

Is that Erinthered, Da Big Man, LaBillz, or Boomer???

 

Not that you ever cared about getting anything right.....but.....ah, never mind.

 

I always enjoy your posts. Cleaning toilets on a destroyer/frigate/canoe for 20 years must of been pretty shiity. Thanks for your service though. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that you ever cared about getting anything right.....but.....ah, never mind.

 

I always enjoy your posts. Cleaning toilets on a destroyer/frigate/canoe for 20 years must of been pretty shiity. Thanks for your service though. :D

 

I only cleaned them for the first four years, after that I got to stand there with a cup of coffee and a clipboard telling some boot that they weren't clean enough...

 

'Course you artillery guys never had to clean toilets, you just went in the woods and hoped the leaves weren't poison ivy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I only cleaned them for the first four years, after that I got to stand there with a cup of coffee and a clipboard telling some boot that they weren't clean enough...

 

'Course you artillery guys never had to clean toilets, you just went in the woods and hoped the leaves weren't poison ivy...

 

 

 

Ah. The other funny part is your confusion of who I am and what I did. Wrong poster, Sarge. :D

 

That must of been some seriously bad coffee to kill so many brain cells so fast. Enjoy the rocker, Gramps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...