gsurdam Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I may be wrong... but I am very disappointed that the Bills took Oman when Mike Hart was still available. I love Mike Hart's running style and dependability as far as never fumbling. I hope Oman proves me wrong. But , I have a feeling the Colts got even better with picking up Hart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I may be wrong... but I am very disappointed that the Bills took Oman when Mike Hart was still available. I love Mike Hart's running style and dependability as far as never fumbling. I hope Oman proves me wrong. But , I have a feeling the Colts got even better with picking up Hart. If he is able to stay on the field you could be correct. Polian linkens him to Mungro, and he was productive for them when called upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACor58 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I may be wrong... but I am very disappointed that the Bills took Oman when Mike Hart was still available. I love Mike Hart's running style and dependability as far as never fumbling. I hope Oman proves me wrong. But , I have a feeling the Colts got even better with picking up Hart. Mike Hart is not very durable. Anyone who watched Michigan play could see him hobble off of the field every few carries. I will say that I was suprised with the Oman pick. He seems like a Dwayne Wright clone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Mike Hart is not very durable. Anyone who watched Michigan play could see him hobble off of the field every few carries. I will say that I was suprised with the Oman pick. He seems like a Dwayne Wright clone. Mike Hart and Anthony Thomas are the same guy and we just rid ourselves of one. Why add another? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdelma Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I may be wrong... but I am very disappointed that the Bills took Oman when Mike Hart was still available. I love Mike Hart's running style and dependability as far as never fumbling. I hope Oman proves me wrong. But , I have a feeling the Colts got even better with picking up Hart. Where is he going to play?23 and 22 and 31 are in front of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Mike Hart and Anthony Thomas are the same guy and we just rid ourselves of one. Why add another? Â that's preposterous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyT Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 But this guy Oman has "sugar hips." Moves on top of moves. And he's not a runt either. Â I'm coming around a bit....even though we really don't need him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Â that's preposterous. Have you ever seen them at the same dinner party? I didn't think so.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Have you ever seen them at the same dinner party?I didn't think so.... Hart is 5'9"....Thomas 6'2"....Hart also belonged to The Order of Angell, while Thomas did not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Â that's preposterous. Assume for a second that I haven't seen enough of both guys to want to vomit. Explain to me the differences in their games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Assume for a second that I haven't seen enough of both guys to want to vomit. Explain to me the differences in their games. Have you watched Hart at Michigan? Thomas is spent...but don't forget he was offensive Rookie of the Year, he just blew out quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Mike Hart now is Anthony Thomas coming out of college. 4 year player, lots of wear and tear, took a lot of contact. never real fast to start with. pretty productive in college but never really wowed anyone. Thomas had one year in the NFL and was done. I see Hart as the same type of guy. What you see today is as good as it's ever going to get and I'm not overly impressed with today. I'd rather have a guy with a little more upside than a younger, smaller, Anthony Thomas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 And I'm aware that Thomas was ROY. Both are plodders and Hart is smaller than Thomas, who at least initially had some power. My point was we just got rid of that player. Why bring in another plodder at tailback? get me a guy with some wiggle and who also ran significantly faster than Hart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Fischer Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Totally agree. There is a world of difference between those two 6th round picks. Jesus, what were they thinking? Â Clearly we should have taken Heart (uh, Hart, whatever) with the 179th pick of the draft or waited until the 217th pick to see if Oman was there. Anyone watching these dudes on Youtube can see that Hart would have been on the field for 10 snaps to Oman's 7 this year. Â How can they be so stupid?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lets_go_bills Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Mike Hart is tiny though. The Bills clearly wanted a bigger back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 And I'm aware that Thomas was ROY. Both are plodders and Hart is smaller than Thomas, who at least initially had some power. My point was we just got rid of that player. Why bring in another plodder at tailback? get me a guy with some wiggle and who also ran significantly faster than Hart. From the BuffNews Billboard blog: "The most curious pick of the Bills draft -- although he's a great story -- was D-II running back Xavier Omon in the sixth round. The Bills have no depth issues at running back, and Omon isn't exactly the change-of-pace-type back that, say, Michigan's Mike Hart would have been. Tom Modrak offered no insight into why the Bills went that way, other than to point out Omon's an intriguing specimen with a history of production. What he's not -- or hasn't been -- is a special-teams player. We shall see. Â --- Bob DiCesare" Â Have to think that's the first time Hart has ever been described with those words... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen. John Blutarsky Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 and Omon isn't exactly the change-of-pace-type back that, say, Michigan's Mike Hart would have been. Â Have to think that's the first time Hart has ever been described with those words... Well, technically slower is a change of pace. Mike Hart, the human circle change.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstealer Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 This team's pretty strong at RB. Id've gone after another lineman there. I guess there weren't any worth it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Hart is a good blitz pickup back with good hands who could have been used in 3rd down packages. Plus it would have created some regional interest since he's from Syracuse. How fast do you need to be inside the 5 yard line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Oman will be better on special teams than Hart ever would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts