Chef Jim Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 But they can be entertaining. Last time I saw O'Reilly, he was trying to explain why Arianna Huffington and the people at her website are "just like the Nazis." Actually, I don't think he was trying to explain why, he just said it a couple times and pretended it made sense. Now THAT's entertainment! Hey, we got our d'oh smilie back. Something good did come from yesterday's crash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilly Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Now THAT's entertainment! Hey, we got our d'oh smilie back. Something good did come from yesterday's crash. Hmm... :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: DAMN! We're still missing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 But they can be entertaining. Last time I saw O'Reilly, he was trying to explain why Arianna Huffington and the people at her website are "just like the Nazis." Actually, I don't think he was trying to explain why, he just said it a couple times and pretended it made sense. And as Judge Judy says "if it doesn't make sense, it ain't true." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 And as Judge Judy says "if it doesn't make sense, it ain't true." But what if it doesn't make sense but your read it on the internet? Can something really be true and untrue at the same time. Damn, that's some really deep stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Oh, there is bias, check out these two stories on the exact same topic: First the one that appears in the America press: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080309/ap_on_...el_palestinians And how its handled in the UK: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20080307/tuk...ts-fa6b408.html The American version is a basic cut and paste from the Israeli press and really is pretty useless. Why are the Pals and Europe angry? Never says so. Just because, I guess. I swear it's like Pavlov's dog. Every time somebody rings the "left is doing something wrong bell" you start salivating, hoping for your "yeah but, the right/moderate/independent/corporate - essentially anyone who's not a socialist - is doing something bad too" food to be substantive, even when the bowl is empty. Fascinating. Retarded, but fascinating. Every time somebody brings up something, you always have an immediate, dopey response that has the slimmest possible relevance to the point they are making. I would say start a new thread about the above articles but I'm afraid to up your quota of 20 nonsense threads a week. Do you understand that when someone on the left is being criticized for doing something stupid, a proper defense of that person is not "yeah but somebody else is doing..." Somebody else has nothing to do with the original person doing something stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 Not a party to Eliot Spitzer scandal?Ray Cooklis, Editorial Board Member, Cincinnati Enquirer 03/13/08 "Eliot Spitzer is a Democrat. There. At least somebody's said it right up front. Hey, it looks like they "fixed" it - now Spitzer is a REPUBLICAN! But I'm sure it's just an innocent mistake. Yep, just a little ol' mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted March 13, 2008 Share Posted March 13, 2008 When a group of largely right wing idiots think I'm crazy, I just consider I'm doing something right. That the leader of the mob--you--hates me, is a source of amusment to me. And boy, are you bent out of shape today in particular <------me <-----you :lol: And what if a left winger thinks you're an idiot, are you still doing something right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 And what if a left winger thinks you're an idiot, are you still doing something right? Then you're a right-winger. Because molson's definition of "left-winger" is "someone who agrees with me". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 If you're into comparison, riddle me this. What do you think today's press would have written about the US military conduct in WWII? The truth? ?? I am the "Riddler", right? ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 You mean the study published in Lancet, which the authors refuse to divulge the data behind the research? The one which trumpeted the 600,000 deaths number, which sticks to inert brain matter? Why thank you GG! And Tom, there have been numerous reports of hundreds of thousands of deaths of Iraqis as well. I'm sure you "probably" think they are all wrong, just because you want them to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 And what if a left winger thinks you're an idiot, are you still doing something right? Well then that's how it goes, oh well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 Or one could be molson, and pull number out of your ass without understanding sh-- on the subject. Either way's good, I guess. Or, it could be you ask me to site to sources and I did and then you changed the subject by attacking the sources. Here's a good one for ya: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/world/mi...nyt&emc=rss Have fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 RI, bow to me as one of my right-wing lackeys should! Holy Christ, you're delusional. Are you sure you don't need to be institutionalized? RI? Who is that? The guy that insults people and doesn't give opinions himself? Does he really count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 Or, it could be you ask me to site to sources and I did and then you changed the subject by attacking the sources. Here's a good one for ya: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/11/world/mi...nyt&emc=rss Have fun No, I asked you to cite sources knowing the sources you'd cite, so I could demonstrate that you didn't understand them. And now, in true molson fashion, you prove my point by quoting a source that 1) isn't a source, and 2) is mis-quoting in exactly the maner I described same Lancet source I discussed. I don't think you've ever demonstrated your ignorance - or lack of reading skills, for that matter - as beautifully and clearly as you just have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 No, I asked you to cite sources knowing the sources you'd cite, so I could demonstrate that you didn't understand them. And now, in true molson fashion, you prove my point by quoting a source that 1) isn't a source, and 2) is mis-quoting in exactly the maner I described same Lancet source I discussed. I don't think you've ever demonstrated your ignorance - or lack of reading skills, for that matter - as beautifully and clearly as you just have. Ah yes, everything is mis-quoted and scum bag Tom is going to fix it. And having to fall back on the tired old--and untrue, not to mention childish--tactic of "reading skills" shows how you have no point to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 Oh, that "British doctor's thingy." Nice to see Molson's ideas are as well-researched as ever. No reasearch needed. He asked me what I had heard in the past and I told him. Why should I reasearch that? I've nothing to hide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 When people who agree with you think you're a raving lunatic, you think maybe it's time to start reevaluating how you present yourself? Scum bag Tom lecturing on internet behavior? Hypocrisy at its absolute best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 Ah yes, everything is mis-quoted and scum bag Tom is going to fix it. And having to fall back on the tired old--and untrue, not to mention childish--tactic of "reading skills" shows how you have no point to make. Except the one I already made and you clearly didn't read. Arguing with you is a really bizarre experience, you know that? You make a claim ("multiple sources say hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died, and the Pentagon lies about it"), can't back it up (cite numerous secondary reports of a single demonstrably flawed source), conclusively demonstrate your total ignorance, then metaphorically cover your ears and scream "I'm not listening!!! Neener neener neener!!! I win!!!" when anyone demonstrates you're not only wrong but stupid, and then insist in believing that people look up to you as an intellectual. I know three-year-olds that are more rational than you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 Except the one I already made and you clearly didn't read. Arguing with you is a really bizarre experience, you know that? You make a claim ("multiple sources say hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died, and the Pentagon lies about it"), can't back it up (cite numerous secondary reports of a single demonstrably flawed source), conclusively demonstrate your total ignorance, then metaphorically cover your ears and scream "I'm not listening!!! Neener neener neener!!! I win!!!" when anyone demonstrates you're not only wrong but stupid, and then insist in believing that people look up to you as an intellectual. I know three-year-olds that are more rational than you. I totally backed it up. You asked an off the cuff remark and I told you what I remember, now you blow it up into your usual bull sh--. Good grief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted March 14, 2008 Share Posted March 14, 2008 The difference is Tom is respected and loved here. YOU, on the other hand.. Fixed that for ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts