Avalanche Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 Sirius reported that Andre isn't in final six, Thurman Is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 Andre was cut from the 1st round elimination votes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMIEBUF12 Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 Andre was cut from the 1st round elimination votes no he wasnt,he lasted untill today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 no he wasnt,he lasted untill today let me rephrase. the first round of elimination votes today 1st round of votes took the list from 17 nominees to 11 2nd round of votes from 11 to 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 I can't believe that coke-head Irvin gets in before Monk and Reed. What the hell is up with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olaf Fub Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 I can't believe that coke-head Irvin gets in before Monk and Reed. What the hell is up with that. I think he was a better receiver than both of them. Hopefully, next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills4154 Posted February 3, 2007 Share Posted February 3, 2007 Irvin used to push off the defensive backs all the time and it was hardly ever called. Other than that he was a good receiver, dont know if he was better than Monk or Reed. Of course he did have a lot of personal problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Irvin used to push off the defensive backs all the time and it was hardly ever called. Other than that he was a good receiver, dont know if he was better than Monk or Reed. Of course he did have a lot of personal problems. Irvin is the best reciever that I have watched- granted, I didn't see Rice in his prime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Irvin is the best reciever that I have watched- granted, I didn't see Rice in his prime I think Irvin was extremely overrated. He only had more than 50 catches 8 times. Reed only had less than 50 catches three times -- once in Washington, once during the year he was injured, and once during his rookie year (he had 48 in his rookie year). His first three seasons he had 78 receptions TOTAL (Reed had 158 in his first three yeras). Reed finished with over 200 more receptions than Irvin. Reed also had over 500 yards rushing (Irvin had 6...) No way was Irvin better than Reed. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 It's all about the media exposure and the rings for Irvin. I have no way of proving it here and now but I doubt many WR's or Cb's who played in Reed's era would think Irvin was nearly as good as him over the long haul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 It's all about the media exposure and the rings for Irvin. I have no way of proving it here and now but I doubt many WR's or Cb's who played in Reed's era would think Irvin was nearly as good as him over the long haul. No question Irvin gets a HUGE boost due to the Rings and his current Job...But He was a hell of a good WR... I'm not sure where the idea that Irvin was not worthy, based on performance, comes from...Irvin is deserving, as is Monk and especially Dre because they were that good...The whole WR thing is a joke if you ask Me...A complete farce...The fact that these great WR's are being held back because one guy blows up the record books is a joke. Andre Reed is worthy and so what if Rice was the one guy that was better after the catch...That still makes Dre pretty darn special if You ask Me...And no one did by the way... Anyway...I think Irvin is most definitely deserving based on His Play and hopefully Dre will follow shortly...I guess we'll see next Year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In space no one can hear Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Irvin is the best reciever that I have watched- granted, I didn't see Rice in his prime Did you ever see Andre Reed play? Well.... that is just one wr who was better than Irvin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Irvin did not retire in the top 5 for major WR stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Irvin is the best reciever that I have watched- granted, I didn't see Rice in his prime Steve Smith? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMIEBUF12 Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 let me rephrase. the first round of elimination votes today 1st round of votes took the list from 17 nominees to 11 2nd round of votes from 11 to 6 sorry about that,i didnt realize the formula,i thought you meant he was cut earlier....my bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBilliever Posted February 4, 2007 Share Posted February 4, 2007 Art Monk was PHENOMENAL. He should definitley get in before cokey mcIrvin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts