stuckincincy Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 Good for him. He certainly was a good player for the Bills. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FBN...EMPLATE=DEFAULT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 Oooo. Nice usage of "re-sign"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 4, 2006 Author Share Posted April 4, 2006 Oooo. Nice usage of "re-sign"! 651387[/snapback] Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 and your point is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 Ahh...watching all of these moves in Miami makes me think how everyone pooh-poohed my suggestion that we might want to go to the college ranks to sign Nick Saban instead of Mularkey. Oh well. Maybe in a couple of years I'll be saying something about Mike Leech as he takes an NFL team to the superbowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X. Benedict Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 Somebody remind me why the Bills let Sammy go. Was it because of the breakout potential of Burns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Flanders Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 Saw that over the weekend...Sammy is one we should have pulled out the stops to keep. Reminds me of Robb Riddick in all he can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 Somebody remind me why the Bills let Sammy go. Was it because of the breakout potential of Burns? 651476[/snapback] No. Sammy wanted an oppurtunity to play more RB and he wasn't going to get it here with TH and WM as 1 and 2......and Miami did not have a RB, so there was more oppurtunity to play RB there....and in fact he might even have started a few games for them..... He was a good ST player while here.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 Ahh...watching all of these moves in Miami makes me think how everyone pooh-poohed my suggestion that we might want to go to the college ranks to sign Nick Saban instead of Mularkey. Oh well. Maybe in a couple of years I'll be saying something about Mike Leech as he takes an NFL team to the superbowl. 651420[/snapback] Why? He reached out for MM. Don't you think that will hurt the fish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted April 4, 2006 Share Posted April 4, 2006 Why? He reached out for MM. Don't you think that will hurt the fish? 651558[/snapback] Reaching out for MM is a puzzlement, but I'm willing to consider he might be a good offensive co-ordinator. His stay at Buffalo didn't do anything to give me any confidence that he was a good offensive co-ordinator...but maybe Nick sees something I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts