B-lo Snow Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Pay for play Nineteen players earned "performance based pay" bonuses of $200,000 or more for the 2005 season. A list of those players: OT Rob Petitti, Cowboys, $271,287 FS C.C. Brown, Texans, $251,593 OT Kelly Butler, Lions, $242,908 OG Rex Hadnot, Dolphins, $235,847 DT Jordan Carstens, Car., $232,748 OT Shane Olivea, Chargers, $223,966 CB Curtis DeLoatch, Giants, $221,005 OG Ryan Lilja, Colts, $215,642 OT Jason Peters, Bills, $215,008 OT Travelle Wharton, Car., $214,048 OG Will Whitticker, Packers, $212,307 CB Travis Daniels, Dolphins, $212,069 OT Anthony Davis, Bucs, $211,350 OG Dan Buenning, Bucs, $210,204 LB Colby Bockwoldt, Saints, $209,943 FS Chris Harris, Bears, $209,362 SS Gibril Wilson, Giants, $207,549 CB Ike Taylor, Steelers, $206,513 FS Kerry Rhodes, Jets, $200,268 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/stor...ht&lid=tab2pos1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 he deserves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Fong Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 I guess I'll state the obvious. I wish my job had something like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scribo Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Very good for him. He is well deserving of this. My favorite part: Every player in the league who participates in even one snap receives something from the PBP pool, which does not impact a player's salary cap charge. The pool to fund the supplements is deducted from the overall league salary cap funds, and it was essentially created by slowing the annual increases in base salaries and by blunting the increases in the annual rookie allocation pool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrixtonBill Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Did OT Rob Petitti, Cowboys, get paid the most ($271,287) because blocking for an immobile statue-like QB is not an easy thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 that would be cool if the players didnt get paid until the end and it was based on their performance, it would eliminate the mike williams' of the sport. i know it would never happen, but it still would be interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 The way some of The Wall talks about Jason Peters, you'd think he'd blow his $215,008 check on shiny metal objects and play-doh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 The way some of The Wall talks about Jason Peters, you'd think he'd blow his $215,008 check on shiny metal objects and play-doh. 641491[/snapback] And how do you know he won't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 There goes the cap! Back to work Clumpy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 There goes the cap! Back to work Clumpy! 641505[/snapback] That performance bonus doesn't count against the cap. Please read the article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 That performance bonus doesn't count against the cap. Please read the article. 641507[/snapback] I never read the articles. mumbles to self about lack of :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: smiley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 I never read the articles. mumbles to self about lack of :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: smiley 641515[/snapback] I said please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 I said please. 641521[/snapback] That's why I mumbled! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Did OT Rob Petitti, Cowboys, get paid the most ($271,287) because blocking for an immobile statue-like QB is not an easy thing to do. 641473[/snapback] [/qB Bill Parcells would rip into Pettiti, he almost sat him a half dozen times I find this odd that he was paid the most Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 I guess I'll state the obvious. I wish my job had something like this. 641457[/snapback] No Christmas bonus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EC-Bills Posted March 24, 2006 Share Posted March 24, 2006 Pay for play Nineteen players earned "performance based pay" bonuses of $200,000 or more for the 2005 season. A list of those players: ... OT Jason Peters, Bills, $215,008 ... 641452[/snapback] Good for Jason. He deserves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 I guess I'll state the obvious. I wish my job had something like this. 641457[/snapback] Peters situation doesn't equate to a job, it's very much like self employment. I'm probably not telling you something you don't already know, but I didn't see the "obvious" part you are talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Pay for play Nineteen players earned "performance based pay" bonuses of $200,000 or more for the 2005 season. A list of those players: OT Rob Petitti, Cowboys, $271,287 FS C.C. Brown, Texans, $251,593 OT Kelly Butler, Lions, $242,908 OG Rex Hadnot, Dolphins, $235,847 DT Jordan Carstens, Car., $232,748 OT Shane Olivea, Chargers, $223,966 CB Curtis DeLoatch, Giants, $221,005 OG Ryan Lilja, Colts, $215,642 OT Jason Peters, Bills, $215,008 OT Travelle Wharton, Car., $214,048 OG Will Whitticker, Packers, $212,307 CB Travis Daniels, Dolphins, $212,069 OT Anthony Davis, Bucs, $211,350 OG Dan Buenning, Bucs, $210,204 LB Colby Bockwoldt, Saints, $209,943 FS Chris Harris, Bears, $209,362 SS Gibril Wilson, Giants, $207,549 CB Ike Taylor, Steelers, $206,513 FS Kerry Rhodes, Jets, $200,268 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/stor...ht&lid=tab2pos1 641452[/snapback] He deserves it, since he'll be starting RT for us come next season. He is a talented player, going from TE to RT. That's pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrate Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 This thread needs more Jason Peters is stupid jokes But he's still our best offensive lineman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 This thread needs more Jason Peters is stupid jokesBut he's still our best offensive lineman 642241[/snapback] Yeah okay, so glad you're our oline coach and can e v a l talent, and knew what each play called was to really know what his assignment was and how he performed on each play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkady Renko Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 Peters situation doesn't equate to a job, it's very much like self employment. I'm probably not telling you something you don't already know, but I didn't see the "obvious" part you are talking about. 642214[/snapback] Ridiculous. Are you trying to pick a fight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 How is that measured? If it was in the article, I missed it. Isn't this sort of subjective? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 How is that measured? If it was in the article, I missed it. Isn't this sort of subjective? 642289[/snapback] It's based on salary and time played against other higher paid players at the position. A certain amount is contributed and split based on time played and salary, with the lower paid players in "higher" priced positions getting more. It has nothing to do with performance, other then being good enough for a specific team to be able to play more, and being low paid. Around the league, there are a lot of players feeling really good about the PBP program, implemented in 2002 as part of that year's extension to the collective bargaining agreement, to establish a fund from NFL revenues to supplement the salaries of men whose playing time in a given season is disproportionate to their compensation. Those who benefit the most are primarily guys like Petitti, young players who generally are earning a minimum base salary. Every player in the league who participates in even one snap receives something from the PBP pool, which does not impact a player's salary cap charge. The pool to fund the supplements is deducted from the overall league salary cap funds, and it was essentially created by slowing the annual increases in base salaries and by blunting the increases in the annual rookie allocation pool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 Yeah okay, so glad you're our oline coach and can e v a l talent, and knew what each play called was to really know what his assignment was and how he performed on each play. And you...do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 And you...do? 642299[/snapback] You should watch a game with the crap throwing monkey sometime. He has a laptop and a writing pad, where he takes notes on offensive line play and runs analysis. I kid not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 It's based on salary and time played against other higher paid players at the position. A certain amount is contributed and split based on time played and salary, with the lower paid players in "higher" priced positions getting more. It has nothing to do with performance, other then being good enough for a specific team to be able to play more, and being low paid. 642292[/snapback] Thanks. I had a mental image of ice skating scores. 7 guys holding up cards saying "8.2" after a block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 You should watch a game with the crap throwing monkey sometime. He has a laptop and a writing pad, where he takes notes on offensive line play and runs analysis. I kid not. ...and WHERE does this analysis go? And is it any good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 ...and WHERE does this analysis go? And is it any good? 642305[/snapback] He actually does a decent job from what I understand. I believe the cats destroy all evidence after each game, so the next opponents scouts do not get ahold of the info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 ...and WHERE does this analysis go? And is it any good? 642305[/snapback] Actually, it is. CTM is an ass (I can call him that because, well, it's true...), but a very smart and perceptive guy. But sorry, the analysis is only discussed within the "Inner Circle" There are quite a few "Old Timey" posters who actually understand what they are looking at, but over the last few years have become way to cynical and jaded to try to post anything relevant here. Glad we still have a few, like Lori and the Cigar Man, and a few others. But they are also getting headaches from 163 different "Trade for Moulds" too. Damn, I think SDS even knows what he's looking at on occassion. Rare occassions, but there are occassions none the less. (Hi, Scooter) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Fong Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 Peters situation doesn't equate to a job, it's very much like self employment. I'm probably not telling you something you don't already know, but I didn't see the "obvious" part you are talking about. 642214[/snapback] SIGH Yes I know it's not like a real job. It was just an offhand comment. Try not to take life too seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfladave Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 SIGH Yes I know it's not like a real job. It was just an offhand comment. Try not to take life too seriously. 642326[/snapback] I wish my company figured out "extra compensation" this way! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 So let me ask you VA; do you like the acquisition of Fowler? And why? 642319[/snapback] Yes, because he isn't Teague first off. Second, he has a good Wonderlic and IMHO that is important for a center. I haven't really seen him play, so beyond that I cannot say too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 (Hi, Scooter) 642320[/snapback] He doesn't like that. Too bad. Hi scooter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 He doesn't like that. Too bad.Hi scooter. 642344[/snapback] Damn, think we pissed off Scooter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts