Dan III Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl Redskins | Saunders named offensive coordinator Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:10 -0800 Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports former Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Al Saunders has been named offensive coordinator of the Washington Redskins, Thursday, Jan. 19. Terms of the contract have not yet been disclosed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl Redskins | Saunders named offensive coordinator Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:10 -0800 Adam Teicher, of the Kansas City Star, reports former Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Al Saunders has been named offensive coordinator of the Washington Redskins, Thursday, Jan. 19. Terms of the contract have not yet been disclosed. 574096[/snapback] I'll bet he got payed a ton of cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I'll bet he got payed a ton of cash. 574098[/snapback] Bank on it. I like Saunders. What's not to like? Lets see.....Gibbs HC...Williams and Saunders as OC and DC. NICE STAFF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 What happened to their old OC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Bank on it. I like Saunders. What's not to like? Lets see.....Gibbs HC...Williams and Saunders as OC and DC. NICE STAFF! 574103[/snapback] And we had Gray, Clements and Meathead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 And we had Gray, Clements and Meathead. 574110[/snapback] Friggin' Meathead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 574113[/snapback] It's not funny. This skins team has less talent then us. Both had a psycho yound qb, with no talent, and a vet with rag arm. Our receivers are better. RB is a push. TE skins are better. Oline about the same, but the skins did a lot more with their talent (Ilone coaching anyone). Defensively, they have sh-- for LBers but Williams does well with them. Noone on their Dline, and corners/safeties are probably a push. So we had a better corps of Lb's and DL. Over all the Bills are probably a little better talent wise, but coaching sucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maguire's Beer Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 It's not funny. This skins team has less talent then us. Both had a psycho yound qb, with no talent, and a vet with rag arm. Our receivers are better. RB is a push. TE skins are better. Oline about the same, but the skins did a lot more with their talent (Ilone coaching anyone). Defensively, they have sh-- for LBers but Williams does well with them. Noone on their Dline, and corners/safeties are probably a push. So we had a better corps of Lb's and DL. Over all the Bills are probably a little better talent wise, but coaching sucked. 574119[/snapback] I'd agree except for the bit about the Skins' O-line. Far superior to ours, imo. But that's not enough to explain how much better they performed than we did. Part of it is that we had a tougher schedule -- but a big chunk of it is coaching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 It's not funny. This skins team has less talent then us. Both had a psycho yound qb, with no talent, and a vet with rag arm. Our receivers are better. RB is a push. TE skins are better. Oline about the same, but the skins did a lot more with their talent (Ilone coaching anyone). Defensively, they have sh-- for LBers but Williams does well with them. Noone on their Dline, and corners/safeties are probably a push. So we had a better corps of Lb's and DL. Over all the Bills are probably a little better talent wise, but coaching sucked. 574119[/snapback] I agree, except calling Mularkey "Meathead" is very funny & always good for a cheap laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 And we had Gray, Clements and Meathead. 574110[/snapback] i've gotta say, why "meathead"? that's just ripping off florio's name for another TE head coach, tice. and florio ripped off himself -- very unoriginally, i might add -- to name mularkey "meathead" as well. as for the origins of the term "meathead", it came from archie bunker, who used it to refer to his overly educated and intellectual (in his view) son in law. i'm sorry to be so picky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerstm Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 And we had Gray, Clements and Meathead. 574110[/snapback] you get what you pay for.. unless you shop at Radio Shack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 It's not funny. This skins team has less talent then us. Both had a psycho yound qb, with no talent, and a vet with rag arm. Our receivers are better. RB is a push. TE skins are better. Oline about the same, but the skins did a lot more with their talent (Ilone coaching anyone). Defensively, they have sh-- for LBers but Williams does well with them. Noone on their Dline, and corners/safeties are probably a push. So we had a better corps of Lb's and DL. Over all the Bills are probably a little better talent wise, but coaching sucked. 574119[/snapback] So now JP Losman is a young QB with no talent? Unfreakinbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I'll bet he got payed a ton of cash. 574098[/snapback] 2 Mil per year for 3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omar Little Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Who's the Raiders' coach gonna be then? Their top 2 candidates were Marinelli and Saunders. Maybe they'll turn to Fassel or hopefully, Haslett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 This might sound stupid but is this fair? There is no cap on coaches' salaries? In this case, WE'RE DOOMED!!! The Skins have the highest paid coach in the league and two coordinators who make more than any head coach in our history. In my humble opinion, the coordinator's job is more important than the head coach's. In short, WE'RE DOOMED!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts