RuntheDamnBall Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 If MW can't go, the freak gets the nod. Here's hoping he outperforms Jerman at least. I'd like to see that clown on the inactive list for the rest of the year, injured or not. It'll be a tough task against a hungry NE front 7. Go Peters! Go Bills! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e-dog Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 That will be interesting. I fully expect Peters will start and I think he will do just as well as the other right tackles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Here's hoping he outperforms Jerman, at least. 487700[/snapback] I think Roscoe Parrish could make the switch and do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 I think Roscoe Parrish could make the switch and do that. 487729[/snapback] Correction: Only when dear Roscoe is fully recovered from his injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 If MW can't go, the freak gets the nod. Here's hoping he outperforms Jerman at least. I'd like to see that clown on the inactive list for the rest of the year, injured or not. It'll be a tough task against a hungry NE front 7. Go Peters! Go Bills! 487700[/snapback] Safety blitz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 I think he will do just as well as the other right tackles.487723[/snapback] That's not very comforting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talonz Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 How will Peters play WR, QB, and RT at the same time?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macaroni Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 can somebody 'splain this whole Peters thing to a fan with little brain????? If I recall correctly he was an undrafted TE that we picked up ...... who doesn't seem to be able to crack into our "stellar" TE corps, so we are trying to convert him to a "kinda sorta LT prospect" ....... but may start this week as our RT. Is he really REALLY that versatile .... is he really REALLY that bad of a TE ...... are the Bills really REALLY that bad at O-Line depth???? or is it just another example of a clueless front office/coaching staff just reacting to situations by plugging in the first solution that pops into their mind??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 I think Roscoe Parrish could make the switch and do that. 487729[/snapback] Nice avatar, you **** My favorite cigar line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsObserver Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 or is it just another example of a clueless front office/coaching staff just reacting to situations by plugging in the first solution that pops into their mind??? 487749[/snapback] right there. clueless, or confused, or just flat out foolish is how the Bills roll. that being said, I'd still rather see Peters than Jerman, who is Arena Football material. Maybe CFL, maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKC Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Is he really REALLY that versatile .... is he really REALLY that bad of a TE ...... are the Bills really REALLY that bad at O-Line depth???? 487749[/snapback] In light of the Peters promotion, JP Losman has tendered his resignation as our #2 QB and would prefer the opportunity to wait and play for a Professional Football team someday in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e-dog Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 You don't have to worry about seeing Jerman as he's definitely out. And Mike won't tough it out. So we are down to Peters. To be honest I don't think he can do much worse imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stussy109 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 can somebody 'splain this whole Peters thing to a fan with little brain?????If I recall correctly he was an undrafted TE that we picked up ...... who doesn't seem to be able to crack into our "stellar" TE corps, so we are trying to convert him to a "kinda sorta LT prospect" ....... but may start this week as our RT. Is he really REALLY that versatile .... is he really REALLY that bad of a TE ...... are the Bills really REALLY that bad at O-Line depth???? or is it just another example of a clueless front office/coaching staff just reacting to situations by plugging in the first solution that pops into their mind??? 487749[/snapback] What he really really is, is an atheltic 300+lb NFL player, willing to learn any position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macaroni Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 What he really really is, is an atheltic 300+lb NFL player, willing to learn any position. 487796[/snapback] But so far we have him "learning" to be a TE ...... and "learning" to be a LT .... and "learning" to be a RT .................. and not making any impact whatsoever at any of those positions. I guess what my point is ...... if we really wanted a LT "project", we should have brought in a legitimate LT to "learn". If we want him to "learn" how to be a TE .... why don't we leave him at TE and gleen a bit of playing time at the position. If memory serves me right .............. he had very limited playing time in college (1year???) and showed some promise so we took a flier on him on the chance to end up an Antonio Gates type of guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 But so far we have him "learning" to be a TE ...... and "learning" to be a LT .... and "learning" to be a RT .................. and not making any impact whatsoever at any of those positions. I guess what my point is ...... if we really wanted a LT "project", we should have brought in a legitimate LT to "learn". If we want him to "learn" how to be a TE .... why don't we leave him at TE and gleen a bit of playing time at the position. If memory serves me right .............. he had very limited playing time in college (1year???) and showed some promise so we took a flier on him on the chance to end up an Antonio Gates type of guy. 487806[/snapback] They did "permanently" switch him to TE when our depth chart was destroyed there, but with Williams still hobbling, and Jerman out, there are no other OT's on the depth chart. With the size, speed and "raw" talent he has the capability to be a good tackle, which is why they had been working him there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewin Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Tackle eligible will be our bread-and-butter play this weekend... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts