buffalo mike Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 What do we owe this to??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frez Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Brillant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffalo mike Posted October 16, 2005 Author Share Posted October 16, 2005 Brillant! 477034[/snapback] Finally- I love this. Like having another Offensive lineman out there. He's huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanM.D. Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Finally- I love this. Like having another Offensive lineman out there.He's huge. 477039[/snapback] Absolutely. If the guy could become a 2-3 catch a game guy (just to keep people honest), it really is like lining up with two tackles on the end of the line. Not to mention, he could certainly take the occasional end around reverse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 I'd love to see him running down the seam just for him to pummel a FS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis in NC Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 If they needed Peters #86 to play tackle in mid-game, can an eligible receiver numbered dude be declared "in-eligible" for a play? Similar to the way Peters #71 would have to declare eligible to play TE (on a per-play basis). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 It is not necessary to declare someone "ineligible." As far as I understand the rule, you need to have an eligible receiver at each end of the line, on the line of scrimmage, there is no rule against having two guys with eligible numbers lined up next to each other.... Any experts out there? If they needed Peters #86 to play tackle in mid-game, can an eligible receiver numbered dude be declared "in-eligible" for a play? Similar to the way Peters #71 would have to declare eligible to play TE (on a per-play basis). 477305[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 That's why I thought making him a backup LT was a mistake. At least with a TE number he can block on any down and go out on any route w/o having to report for it. Not using him as a TE would be a major mistake unless he's proven to the coaching staff that he really can't catch worth a damn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 How about the announcer saying 3 times: "Wait a minute now, lets see if actually held on to this ball!" Huh? Was that not like the cleanest catch EVER? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 What do we owe this to??? 477031[/snapback] Depth at tight end due to injuries. Good to see an offense finally throwing to tight ends again, nice grab by the big guy and finally hitting Campbell down field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colorado Mike Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 How about the announcer saying 3 times: "Wait a minute now, lets see if actually held on to this ball!" Huh? Was that not like the cleanest catch EVER? 477394[/snapback] That's exactly what I thought at the time. There was no juggling, ball touching the ground, etc. I have no clue what that jackass was talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACTOBILLSFAN Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 How about the announcer saying 3 times: "Wait a minute now, lets see if actually held on to this ball!" Huh? Was that not like the cleanest catch EVER? 477394[/snapback] Solomon Wilcots and the play-by-play guy were horrible all game!!! Wilcots needs to park his ass back on NFL network where there is a teleprompter he can read off because he obviously lacks ab-libbing skills. ON the same type of note: did anybody hear the color analyst for ND/USC game when they showedr reggie bush getting stretched out by a trainer??? And i quote "You know that's illegal in some parts of Utah." The stunned silence from the play-by-play guy was absolutely priceless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffalOhio Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Solomon Wilcots and the play-by-play guy were horrible all game!!! Wilcots needs to park his ass back on NFL network where there is a teleprompter he can read off because he obviously lacks ab-libbing skills. ON the same type of note: did anybody hear the color analyst for ND/USC game when they showedr reggie bush getting stretched out by a trainer??? And i quote "You know that's illegal in some parts of Utah." The stunned silence from the play-by-play guy was absolutely priceless. 477617[/snapback] Yeah, I heard that, and wondered, "WTF did he just say?" That was an awesome game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stussy109 Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 a FORCE to be reckoned with. I like the mismatches he creates. Serves as both an extra Tackle, and an "uncoverable" tight end based on his ability to get position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 How about the announcer saying 3 times: "Wait a minute now, lets see if actually held on to this ball!" Huh? Was that not like the cleanest catch EVER? 477394[/snapback] They sucked! Wilcotts was wetting his pants hoping for a Jets win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeFerguson Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 That's exactly what I thought at the time. There was no juggling, ball touching the ground, etc. I have no clue what that jackass was talking about. 477587[/snapback] Are you fellas referring to this chain of events? http://photos1.blogger.com/img/94/1130/1024/IMG_6334.jpg http://photos1.blogger.com/img/94/1130/1024/IMG_6335.jpg http://photos3.blogger.com/img/94/1130/1024/IMG_6336.jpg http://photos3.blogger.com/img/94/1130/1024/IMG_6337.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Solomon Wilcots and the play-by-play guy were horrible all game!!! 477617[/snapback] When I watched the taped game after I got home at first I started laughing every time he called us the BIWS....then it got kinda irritating. There's two L's in there, dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye Eric Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 What do we owe this to??? 477031[/snapback] It can't be the coaches. They are inept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In space no one can hear Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 It can't be the coaches. They are inept. 477934[/snapback] Or are they inept? Why was he not just left at tight end....the position he played in college??? Campbell and Euhus do nort present the mismatches that Petersdoes...Peters belongs on the field!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ch19079 Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Finally- I love this. Like having another Offensive lineman out there.He's huge. 477039[/snapback] early in the game, he caught a pass. my roommate was like.. "who the hell is that.. hes freakin HUGE!!!" it was peters. and i was happy. i also like how campbell had a few receptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts