DabillsDaBillsDaBills Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, dhg said: But they could have made it 28-21. One score game. Instead, by going for 2 and missing it became a two score game It was still a 1 score game at 28-20. Obviously that's dependent on them converting the next 2 pointer though. I think the math is fairly simple in this scenario. If you're down by 14 in the 4th Q you should always go for 2. If you have a 40% chance of converting (somewhat less than league average) the odds look like this: 40% chance of converting the first 2 pt conversion leading to a large advantage (win on the next TD+PAT) 36% chance of failing both 2 point conversions leading to a large disadvantage (2 point deficit) 24% chance failing the 1st 2 point conversion and succeeding on the 2nd leading to a tie Quote
dhg Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 22 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said: It was still a 1 score game at 28-20. Obviously that's dependent on them converting the next 2 pointer though. I think the math is fairly simple in this scenario. If you're down by 14 in the 4th Q you should always go for 2. If you have a 40% chance of converting (somewhat less than league average) the odds look like this: 40% chance of converting the first 2 pt conversion leading to a large advantage (win on the next TD+PAT) 36% chance of failing both 2 point conversions leading to a large disadvantage (2 point deficit) 24% chance failing the 1st 2 point conversion and succeeding on the 2nd leading to a tie I understand that. But if you kick the 1 you don't worry about having to go for 2 pt conversion. Take it to OT worst case Quote
djp14150 Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago 1 hour ago, dhg said: But they could have made it 28-21. One score game. Instead, by going for 2 and missing it became a two score game 8 pts is not a 2 score game. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.