Who do we want, who do we need as our next OC/DC?

[The Jokeman]

10 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

lol don't just post a video. give me your thoughts. 

what about the west coast offense makes it more 'timing' based than other systems?

It means your QBs is throwing to a spot and you're expecting your WR to be at that spot when ball gets there. Case in point you take a 5 step drop as a QB you should be throwing that as your foot lands on the that last step and anticipating your WR going to finish his route and be where you throw it. IF Josh decides to instead scramble to his right and looking for a WR well then it blows up the "timing of the play" and your WR then have to then adjust their routes accordingly. Short accurate passes to move the chains is what defines the offense. 

Edited 2 hours ago by The Jokeman

[GoBills808]

2 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:

It means your QBs is throwing to a spot and you're expecting your WR to be at that spot when ball gets there. Case in point you take a 5 step drop as a QB you should be throwing that as your foot lands on the that last step and anticipating your WR going to finish his route and be where you throw it. IF Josh decides to instead scramble to his right and looking for a WR well then it blows up the "timing of the play" and your WR then have to then adjust their routes accordingly. Short accurate passes to move the chains. 

what you are describing in terms of 'timing' is not specific to a west coast offense

[GoBills808]

@The Jokemansince you edited your comment 

 

all offensive systems benefit from timely accurate passes. that you choose to focus on wco as unique in this regard suggests you think there is a singular trait or feature of these different systems that differentiates...and that only a particular kind of QB could succeed therein. while there are definable differences (concepts v trees, etc) what mainly separates the various nfl offenses today are 1 terminologies and 2 particular skillsets of your offensive personnel. that's why shanahan's wco w purdy looks very different from andy reid's w mahomes, or even from his original offense in atlanta w matt ryan and julio jones. look at what mcvay is doing right now w stafford- looks very different from the offense he ran w goff, yes? much less under center, allows the QB to dissect, doesn't rely so heavily on play action...your personnel informs your scheme

[SectionC3]

22 hours ago, boater said:

 

I don't think Josh is a big fan of Daboll. Unless, possibly--Daboll is restricted to the skybox. He needs to be in a place where his temper can't harm anyone.

 

I remember those days of Daboll on the sideline screaming at Josh. No one wants a redux of that.

You’re wrong.  They are like family.  

[SectionC3]

On 11/25/2025 at 9:11 AM, SCBills said:

Brady is 100% gone after this season regardless of how this goes. 
 

Theres friction there between him and McDermott and probably him and Josh. 
 

You can sense it in their pressers when asked about him.  Veiled comments and body language = not good. 
 

They turn it around and win it all, great… he gets his pick of HC jobs.  They don’t, and it ends however it ends.. he’s likely off to a college HC job.  Either way, he’s done here. 

I agree with this.  He’s the angle nobody talks about: 

 

We have to make it fun for our QB who is rich beyond his wildest dreams to drag his Oscar-caliber wife away from her career and SoCal weather for six months a year to play on this football team.  This ***** this year is decidedly not fun.  So the question becomes what makes it fun, and who blends fun with competence? 
 

The answer smacking everyone in the face is Brian Daboll.  No matter how this year shakes out Brady is cooked.  So then we get into who replaces him, which leads, in my view, inevitably to Josh asking for Daboll.  I suppose Daboll could get another head job-but that’s doubtful for this cycle, and that brings Davis Webb into the mix.  
 

in any event, turning back to Daboll, then the question is does McD take him back.  And then we get into this tug of war where it very well could be that Josh says I’m getting Daboll, McD resists and, short of a Super Bowl appearance, that resistance leads to a parting of ways in which Daboll is the head coach of the Bills in 2026. 

[GoBills808]

6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

I agree with this.  He’s the angle nobody talks about: 

 

We have to make it fun for our QB who is rich beyond his wildest dreams to drag his Oscar-caliber wife away from her career and SoCal weather for six months a year to play on this football team.  This ***** this year is decidedly not fun.  So the question becomes what makes it fun, and who blends fun with competence? 
 

The answer smacking everyone in the face is Brian Daboll.  No matter how this year shakes out Brady is cooked.  So then we get into who replaces him, which leads, in my view, inevitably to Josh asking for Daboll.  I suppose Daboll could get another head job-but that’s doubtful for this cycle, and that brings Davis Webb into the mix.  
 

in any event, turning back to Daboll, then the question is does McD take him back.  And then we get into this tug of war where it very well could be that Josh says I’m getting Daboll, McD resists and, short of a Super Bowl appearance, that resistance leads to a parting of ways in which Daboll is the head coach of the Bills in 2026. 

zero point zero chance Daboll and McDermott are ever on the same staff again

[SectionC3]

12 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

zero point zero chance Daboll and McDermott are ever on the same staff again

We’ll see.  I don’t think Josh is running it back with a McD OC other than Daboll/Davis Webb after this nonsense this year. 

[GoBills808]

13 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

We’ll see.  I don’t think Josh is running it back with a McD OC other than Daboll/Davis Webb after this nonsense this year. 

😂😂well i said after they fired dorsey this was the start of a quote very unfortunate 3year attempt at a ball control offense unquote so i have to give them one more season of small ball before they all get fired