Never. Ever. Vote for MAGA Republicans. Again.

[JDHillFan]

3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Whatevs, Anus Man.   You just want a brown star for your post.  But you won’t get it here.  You’ll have to ask one of your sicko friends for that.  

And it’s only going to get worse once domestic cattle ranchers bust. 

Thanks for the follow. Don’t forget to smash the like button. 
 

also:

 

On 7/9/2025 at 2:16 PM, SectionC3 said:

Get over it. Stop whining.  Enough outrage.  Spend the time helping someone instead. 

 

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Whatevs, Anus Man.   You just want a brown star for your post.  But you won’t get it here.  You’ll have to ask one of your sicko friends for that.  

And it’s only going to get worse once domestic cattle ranchers bust. 

So nobody should eat beef then?

 

How do you magically makes full grown cattle appear?

[nedboy7]

8 hours ago, sherpa said:

You do realize, Homey, that this ballroom is being paid for from non gov., ie non taxpayer money, don't you?

Private donations.

Of course you don't know that.

 

 

 

"I view this enormous ballroom as an ethics nightmare," Richard Painter, a former chief ethics lawyer in the Bush White House between 2005 and 2007, told the BBC.

"It's using access to the White House to raise money. I don't like it," he added. "These corporations all want something from the government."

A dinner for potential donors held at the White House on 15 October included senior executives from prominent US companies including Blackstone, OpenAI, Microsoft, Coinbase, Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, Amazon and Google.

 

 

8 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

So nobody should eat beef then?

 

How do you magically makes full grown cattle appear?

 

Do you read anything or just gargle the Trump diarrhea?  

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-lawmakers-warn-trumps-argentina-beef-proposal-could-rattle-us-ranchers

 

Notice the comments are turned off on this article.  Need to protect the mindless idiots from opposing ideas.  

Edited 3 hours ago by nedboy7

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

2 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

 

 

"I view this enormous ballroom as an ethics nightmare," Richard Painter, a former chief ethics lawyer in the Bush White House between 2005 and 2007, told the BBC.

"It's using access to the White House to raise money. I don't like it," he added. "These corporations all want something from the government."

A dinner for potential donors held at the White House on 15 October included senior executives from prominent US companies including Blackstone, OpenAI, Microsoft, Coinbase, Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, Amazon and Google.

 

 

 

Do you read anything or just gargle the Trump diarrhea?  

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-lawmakers-warn-trumps-argentina-beef-proposal-could-rattle-us-ranchers

Ned what part of we don't have enough cattle to sell don't you understand?

[nedboy7]

Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Ned what part of we don't have enough cattle to sell don't you understand?

 

What part of the article did you read that quickly?  

[SectionC3]

Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Ned what part of we don't have enough cattle to sell don't you understand?

Lower labor prices and the price of beef comes down.  But MAGA scared off the labor supply and doesn’t want to work the fields itself.  

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

1 minute ago, nedboy7 said:

 

What part of the article did you read that quickly?  

We haven't been this low since 1951. Google is your friend.

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

Lower labor prices and the price of beef comes down.  But MAGA scared off the labor supply and doesn’t want to work the fields itself.  

You can't sell something u don't have. Cattle head is been downward trending for a while. Look it up.

[nedboy7]

3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Ned what part of we don't have enough cattle to sell don't you understand?

 

You all are so absurdly ignorant on diverse opinions on subjects.  Culty in a way. 

 

https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/blogs/ag-policy-blog/blog-post/2025/10/20/fact-check-can-argentine-beef-really

 

There is a lot to say about using beef from a country receiving a $20 billion bailout to lower consumer beef prices -- along with prices for cattle producers.

Statistically speaking, though, the numbers just don't bear out the prospect that Argentinian beef will be a driver to lower prices for American consumers.

All of this also comes after the Trump administration had pressed for countries such as England and Japan to open their markets to buy more U.S. beef.

 

Both the U.S. and Argentina would have to make a massive shift in sales, shipping and infrastructure for Argentina to dramatically increase sales to the U.S.

 

Brazil was one of the main drivers of the import surge before President Trump placed a 50% tariff on Brazilian products. (As of now, no new data has come out to reflect whether the 50% tariff on Brazil has slowed down beef sales.) Through July, Brazilian packers had already shipped more than 810 million pounds of beef to the U.S. -- about 220 million more pounds of beef than Brazil shipped in all of 2024, which was a record.

[Wolfgang]

3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Lower labor prices and the price of beef comes down.  But MAGA scared off the labor supply and doesn’t want to work the fields itself.  

 

 

 

Your love of illegal alien labor is truly heart warming...

 

And amusing...

 

Please, continue...

 

Over 3 years to go lol...

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

You all are so absurdly ignorant on diverse opinions on subjects.  Culty in a way. 

 

https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/blogs/ag-policy-blog/blog-post/2025/10/20/fact-check-can-argentine-beef-really

 

There is a lot to say about using beef from a country receiving a $20 billion bailout to lower consumer beef prices -- along with prices for cattle producers.

Statistically speaking, though, the numbers just don't bear out the prospect that Argentinian beef will be a driver to lower prices for American consumers.

All of this also comes after the Trump administration had pressed for countries such as England and Japan to open their markets to buy more U.S. beef.

 

Both the U.S. and Argentina would have to make a massive shift in sales, shipping and infrastructure for Argentina to dramatically increase sales to the U.S.

 

Brazil was one of the main drivers of the import surge before President Trump placed a 50% tariff on Brazilian products. (As of now, no new data has come out to reflect whether the 50% tariff on Brazil has slowed down beef sales.) Through July, Brazilian packers had already shipped more than 810 million pounds of beef to the U.S. -- about 220 million more pounds of beef than Brazil shipped in all of 2024, which was a record.

Ned we don't have cattle you dolt.

 

Do you understand?

[The Frankish Reich]

18 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

So nobody should eat beef then?

 

How do you magically makes full grown cattle appear?

The same way you make coffee grown in North Dakota and bananas grow in Maine?

 

It’s been funny listening to Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent talk about this, as the rationales they offer diverge quite a bit. Bessent goes to some trouble to dress it up in the language of economics, casting it as a canny investment for America: “The success of Argentina’s reform agenda is of systemic importance, and a strong, stable Argentina which helps anchor a prosperous Western Hemisphere is in the strategic interest of the United States,” he tweeted this month. But Trump’s been explicit: He’s doing it to prop up his buddy Milei. “I’m with this man because his philosophy is correct,” Trump said of Milei last week. “And if he wins, we’re staying with him, and if he doesn’t win, we’re gone.”

 

Whatever the rationale, it’s not clear their strategy is helping much. The Argentine peso sank to record lows yesterday, with little indication that the midterms were going to turn in Milei’s favor (who could have guessed that voters may not like the idea of being run by an American-puppet government?) and traders seemingly unimpressed by Bessent’s pitch of the currency as a prudent investment. The United States is now the proud owner of $20 billion in increasingly worthless Argentinian currency. America First, baby!

 

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/dont-cry-for-me-argentina-heres-40b-trump-america-first-moo

[sherpa]

38 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

You are 100% MAGA.

 

It appears that it is really important to you to label posters in an attempt to marginalize them.

Forget about facts.

Forget about the accuracy of claims here.

It is simply about labeling.

I would be happy if JD Vance replaced Trump tomorrow, and I can name a few others.

But I am more pleased that we don't live under the lunacy of a brain dead president, or his beyond brain dead VP, nor the Gov of Minnesota, who is the biggest goof I have ever seen run for national office.

That view, in no way, makes me "MAGA," nor have I ever voted that way.

[The Frankish Reich]

 

Latest exchange rate: the Argentine peso is now worth .00067 USD.

Make sure you put enough zeroes in there.

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

The same way you make coffee grown in North Dakota and bananas grow in Maine?

 

It’s been funny listening to Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent talk about this, as the rationales they offer diverge quite a bit. Bessent goes to some trouble to dress it up in the language of economics, casting it as a canny investment for America: “The success of Argentina’s reform agenda is of systemic importance, and a strong, stable Argentina which helps anchor a prosperous Western Hemisphere is in the strategic interest of the United States,” he tweeted this month. But Trump’s been explicit: He’s doing it to prop up his buddy Milei. “I’m with this man because his philosophy is correct,” Trump said of Milei last week. “And if he wins, we’re staying with him, and if he doesn’t win, we’re gone.”

 

Whatever the rationale, it’s not clear their strategy is helping much. The Argentine peso sank to record lows yesterday, with little indication that the midterms were going to turn in Milei’s favor (who could have guessed that voters may not like the idea of being run by an American-puppet government?) and traders seemingly unimpressed by Bessent’s pitch of the currency as a prudent investment. The United States is now the proud owner of $20 billion in increasingly worthless Argentinian currency. America First, baby!

 

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/dont-cry-for-me-argentina-heres-40b-trump-america-first-moo

Thanks for adding nothing!

[The Frankish Reich]

1 minute ago, sherpa said:

who is the biggest goof I have ever seen run for national office.

How quickly they forget Dan Quayle.

And ever more quickly Sara Palin.

 

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

11 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

 

You all are so absurdly ignorant on diverse opinions on subjects.  Culty in a way. 

 

https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/blogs/ag-policy-blog/blog-post/2025/10/20/fact-check-can-argentine-beef-really

 

There is a lot to say about using beef from a country receiving a $20 billion bailout to lower consumer beef prices -- along with prices for cattle producers.

Statistically speaking, though, the numbers just don't bear out the prospect that Argentinian beef will be a driver to lower prices for American consumers.

All of this also comes after the Trump administration had pressed for countries such as England and Japan to open their markets to buy more U.S. beef.

 

Both the U.S. and Argentina would have to make a massive shift in sales, shipping and infrastructure for Argentina to dramatically increase sales to the U.S.

 

Brazil was one of the main drivers of the import surge before President Trump placed a 50% tariff on Brazilian products. (As of now, no new data has come out to reflect whether the 50% tariff on Brazil has slowed down beef sales.) Through July, Brazilian packers had already shipped more than 810 million pounds of beef to the U.S. -- about 220 million more pounds of beef than Brazil shipped in all of 2024, which was a record.

U.S. Cattle Inventory Smallest in 73 years | Market Intel | American Farm Bureau Federation https://share.google/hPQPRX9HOeqBGHlKK

[The Frankish Reich]

2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Thanks for adding nothing!

When you visit Buenos Aires you can tip your valet five bucks or 7,500 pesos. Your choice.

2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

U.S. Cattle Inventory Smallest in 73 years | Market Intel | American Farm Bureau Federation https://share.google/hPQPRX9HOeqBGHlKK

So I thought the purpose of tariffs was to increase domestic production, regardless of what the good may be.

That's why there's a tariff on aluminum even though it will take years to ramp up domestic production. 

 

[AlBUNDY4TDS]

1 minute ago, The Frankish Reich said:

When you visit Buenos Aires you can tip your valet five bucks or 7,500 pesos. Your choice.

Doubling down huh?

[JDHillFan]

3 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

How quickly they forget Dan Quayle.

And ever more quickly Sara Palin.

 

This must be your “fierce independent” part coming out. 

[sherpa]

4 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

How quickly they forget Dan Quayle.

And ever more quickly Sara Palin.

 

 

I haven't forgotten.

Both were terrible choices.

Neither was as bad as Timmy.