Puckman5 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 7 hours ago, Rousseauisnoschmo said: Because Mcdermott and Beane are nice guys who help old ladies cross the street. No old lady I know would consider taking help from either of them after seeing this defense. You need a sound strategy to cross a road safely. 1 Quote
Paup 1995MVP Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 2 hours ago, harmonkillebrew said: Replace Rapp with Poyer? man things are bad. How about trade for a S and bench Rapp. Cole has the range and poor tackling ability that better fits a deep FS. No safety should have as poor of tackling ability as Bishop has shown in his short NFL career. Neither Bishop or Rapp should be playing. They stink.. I agree a trade for a safety if someone decent were available would be nice. And we do have Jordan Hancock drafted in the 5th round. Give the kid a chance. He is better with far more upside than what we have seen on the field so far this season. Maybe playing with Poyer, he will learn a lot quickly too. And btw your user name cracks me up. I had one of his baseball cards as a little kid in around 1971. Quote
jlatas Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Paup 1995MVP said: No safety should have as poor of tackling ability as Bishop has shown in his short NFL career. Neither Bishop or Rapp should be playing. They stink.. I'll never understand why Cole Bishop simply didnt just shove Bijan Robinson out of bounds on his long run...that tackle would have been tough for most defensive backs! 1 Quote
nosejob Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago I don't know where things stand today, but I'm going after Woolen and Dugger. WR is what ya make it and if you're getting blitzed to death and don't have time for someone to get open, I don't care who you have. I hope they start using the backs more to punish for blitzing and loading the box. Play man if ya want and send pressure but looky ,looky there goes Cooky....or ty...or davis. BTW, I got a bad feeling about our 1st rd. pick. I'll take the under on 3 weeks active. Oft hurt Erkel? 1 Quote
Richard Noggin Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 9 hours ago, 2003Contenders said: Agreed. I don't think the issue with Coleman is that he is getting too many targets -- it is the KIND of targets he is getting. I really do believe that he is best utilized in the bubble and slant game, where he can best utilize his basketball box-out skills and physicality rather than expecting him to win downfield battles, when creating separation isn't a gift of his. If Brady can get get him involved in these situations early in a game, I also think it would help with his confidence, which I believe has been hindered the last couple of games. Maybe getting him involved in a thoughtful, creative manner COULD eventually help him elevate his route running and better develop nuances to ultimately create separation on intermediate and deeper routes? Remember a few seasons back, that ONE game against Tampa when Gabe Davis was used in the way you suggest for Coleman now (slants, screens, etc.)? Davis had 9 for 87 and a TD. THAT's exactly how we should be using Coleman, no doubt. 1 Quote
ganesh Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 13 hours ago, hondo in seattle said: I usually scoff when journalists pretend to know more than coaches. But I agree with most of this. Marino is not a journalist. He is more of a podcaster. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.