Ga boy Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 17 hours ago, thenorthremembers said: I've actually done a little bit of that and I agree with you. Some of what I originally wrote in my review of the game I see differently looking at it slowed down and not rushing to post a review. Even going back to our discussion about Cover 2 vs Cover 1 on that one Kincaid route, I see your point, which I believe was around what the look is by definition and what the actual coverage is based on the intent of the play. The second safety was always going to play man on Kincaid, so it really can only be Cover 1. I also fully agree on your point about the thin margins. I still wish he would have stayed in the pocket longer on a few plays but that reaction is likely built in from him having to manifest something. That said, I hope I never watch another second of All 22 from the Patriots game. On to the Falcons and hopefully some help at the WR posittion at some point. Quick question: In your slow down analysis, could the ball have gone to Kincaid more?? 1 Quote
thenorthremembers Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Ga boy said: Quick question: In your slow down analysis, could the ball have gone to Kincaid more?? A few instances. That said, he needed to be on the field more. He looked fantastic. 1 Quote
Billsfanatic8989 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago They didn't go to Kincaid enough. NE could not stop him. If something is working, you keep doing it until it doesn't work. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.