Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5542714-bondi-bribery-allegations-trump-border-czar/

 

NBC News: there's video of Homan taking the Cava bag full of $50,000 cash.

 

Karoline Leavitt: Your facts are wrong, he never took the cash.

 

Question to Pam Bondi: Did he take the cash?

 

Answer from Pam Bondi: The investigation is closed.

 

Question: so where is the cash?

 

Answer: the investigation is closed (Bondi will not repeat the "he didn't take the cash" talking point)

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

No one cares.

Some things don't go away. It takes them a while to bubble up in public consciousness, but they don't go away.

 

We understand there's a video of him taking the cash. That video will surface.

 

Note that Homan himself did not repeat the Leavitt talking point that he didn't take the money ...

Posted
42 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

No one cares.

I actually care.

 

If there indeed is a video of him taking a bag of cash I'd like to see it. I'm reasonably sure that alone is enough to warrant a bribery charge.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Some things don't go away. It takes them a while to bubble up in public consciousness, but they don't go away.

 

We understand there's a video of him taking the cash. That video will surface.

 

Note that Homan himself did not repeat the Leavitt talking point that he didn't take the money ...

There's some truth here.  We had "Biden cognitively sharp", Hillary playing fast and loose with security, Obama blaming some poor bast@rd for making a video and inciting the Benghazi incident, and all those stories of surveillance and authoritarian overreach by DOJ,  Comey, Smith et al.  Add to that private companies recognizing civil exposure and settling to avoid getting hammered in court, the Ashli Babbitt settlement and everything else.  Who would have bet all those stories get sorted out in 2025  with he way things looked through 2023 and up through November of 2024?  What a wild ride!

 

Like here though, these issues will move some people and not so much others.   

Posted
1 hour ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Things that probably didn't happen for 100, Alex!

Let's say you're a government official.

You are accused of accepting $50,000 in a takeout restaurant bag.

Your response:

A. "I don't even know what you're talking about. Of course I've never done such a thing"

B. "There was an investigation and I've done nothing wrong."

 

Only people who have actually taken $50,000 in a takeout bag answer B.

Posted

Its the bag of cash. LOL lefty trump hating tarts...go buy a life do something else besides raging about a president, dumb *****

Posted
On 9/20/2025 at 9:23 PM, Max Fischer said:

Trump Justice Dept. Closed Investigation Into Tom Homan for Accepting Bag of Cash

 

Mr. Homan came under scrutiny after he was said to be recorded last year taking $50,000 in cash from undercover F.B.I. agents.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/20/us/politics/tom-homan-fbi-trump.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

 

Tom Homan, who was later named President Trump’s border czar, was recorded in September 2024 accepting a bag with $50,000 in cash in an undercover F.B.I. investigation, according to people familiar with the case, which was later shut down by Trump administration officials.

The cash payment, which was made inside a bag from the food chain Cava, grew out of a long-running counterintelligence investigation that had not been targeting Mr. Homan, according to the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the case.

 

Mr. Homan’s encounter with the undercover agents, recorded on audiotape, led him to be investigated for potential bribery and other crimes, after he apparently took the money and agreed to help the agents — who were posing as businessmen — secure future government contracts related to border security, the people said.

 

After Mr. Trump took office this year, Justice Department officials shut down the case because of doubts about whether prosecutors could prove to a jury that Mr. Homan had agreed to do any specific acts in exchange for the money, and because he had not held an official government position at the time of the meeting with undercover agents, the people added.

 

So corrupt. And @Big Blitz @BillsFanNC @B-Man can't stop crying about their skinned knees.

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...