Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 03:43 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:43 AM Thanks Grok Poland was not attacked. But Joe Wilson really wants WWIII. He had his tweet ready 4 hours ago. We know this.
Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 03:57 AM Posted Wednesday at 03:57 AM Omg where was Poland hit? By what???? Was it this: FYI the VP is currently tweeting about Charlotte but yep. Poland is “under attack.” 1
Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 04:02 AM Posted Wednesday at 04:02 AM Sounds serious. ….the downing of drones that intruded into our airspace and could have posed a threat. What could have been. 1
Niagara Bill Posted Wednesday at 12:46 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:46 PM 9 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Thanks Grok Poland was not attacked. But Joe Wilson really wants WWIII. He had his tweet ready 4 hours ago. We know this. Unless of course your goal is to reunite USSR, with cooperation of a certain prez, abd support of China and India.
Roundybout Posted Wednesday at 01:40 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:40 PM 9 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Omg where was Poland hit? By what???? Was it this: FYI the VP is currently tweeting about Charlotte but yep. Poland is “under attack.” Thats because the VP is a sad beta male who I wouldn’t trust to lead a Burger King 1
Big Blitz Posted Wednesday at 01:43 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:43 PM NATO activate article 5 yet lol lol
SectionC3 Posted Wednesday at 01:54 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:54 PM Of course this benefits Putin. Now the temp is up, Trump doesn’t want NATO involved, and the bet on the Russian side is that Trump will turn up the heat on Zelenskyy to capitulate. The bet further is that Europe won’t respond (a safe bet, and not because of European weakness), and Russia suffers no harm. Unless, of course, those sanctions that Trump never followed through on are imposed. Which they probably won’t be. So it’s a smart play for Putin.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Wednesday at 01:58 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:58 PM 17 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Thats because the VP is a sad beta male who I wouldn’t trust to lead a Burger King Lmao you wanted Walz. Sit this one out lmfao. 1
Roundybout Posted Wednesday at 03:36 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:36 PM 1 hour ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Lmao you wanted Walz. Sit this one out lmfao. At least Walz didn’t change his name 3 times for political points
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Wednesday at 03:38 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:38 PM (edited) 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: At least Walz didn’t change his name 3 times for political points And this matters why? Vance has more balls than you or Walz could ever dream of lmao. This could possibly be your worst take ever. Edited Wednesday at 03:39 PM by AlBUNDY4TDS
Roundybout Posted Wednesday at 03:44 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:44 PM 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: And this matters why? Vance has more balls than you or Walz could ever dream of lmao. This could possibly be your worst take ever. Vance is a loser whose mom sold him for percs He has zero morals and has changed his positions on everything for power. He’s a loser who has no idea how to handle diplomacy His policies betray his own family 1
B-Man Posted Wednesday at 03:46 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:46 PM 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Vance is a loser whose mom sold him for percs He has zero morals Who has zero morals in this response ?
Recommended Posts