Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Never has the presidency of the United States sunk so low as with Trump currying favor for a sex trafficker
B-Man Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Look ! The Left is out of ideas. "Let's regurgitate some old disproved Epstein file and pretend it's something new !" Some kneepads for Tibs and Billstime. 1
B-Man Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago For those who 'missed' it. And it's not like Giuffre was afraid of naming names when she was alive. Total nothing burger of a story.
teef Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 12 minutes ago, B-Man said: Look ! The Left is out of ideas. "Let's regurgitate some old disproved Epstein file and pretend it's something new !" Some kneepads for Tibs and Billstime. disproved epstein files? you have got to be kidding me. 1 1
The Frankish Reich Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 9 minutes ago, B-Man said: For those who 'missed' it. And it's not like Giuffre was afraid of naming names when she was alive. Total nothing burger of a story. I like how your little tweeter puts "VICTIM" in scare quotes, suggesting that she was nothing more than a 16 year old slut rather than a victim of rape. Nice. 1
teef Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: I like how your little tweeter puts "VICTIM" in scare quotes, suggesting that she was nothing more than a 16 year old slut rather than a victim of rape. Nice. the ***** we hear about how this a nothing, hoax, etc is going to be disgusting.
The Frankish Reich Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, teef said: the ***** we hear about how this a nothing, hoax, etc is going to be disgusting. Yep, so far they've avoided the slut shaming of the 14-16 year olds, but when it starts getting a little too close to their hero no holds are barred. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Why didn't a reporter ask Leavitt "Why is it so important to trump that he has an 11th hour meeting in the situation room with Boebert to get her to remove her signature?" "What is he hiding?" would be another good one. Seems some maga's are asking themselves these obvious questions but not on PPP... https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5602400-trump-boebert-mace-epstein-petition/
The Frankish Reich Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Why didn't a reporter ask Leavitt "Why is it so important to trump that he has an 11th hour meeting in the situation room with Boebert to get her to remove her signature?" "What is he hiding?" would be another good one. Seems some maga's are asking themselves these obvious questions but not on PPP... https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5602400-trump-boebert-mace-epstein-petition/ I hadn't seen this, but it really doesn't surprise me. I guess his extraordinary efforts show this is more than a hoax. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Look ! The Left is out of ideas. "Let's regurgitate some old disproved Epstein file and pretend it's something new !" Some kneepads for Tibs and Billstime. Child sex offenders shouldn't get special good treatment. Yet you disagree Why is that? Why are you so happy he is helping a child sex offender? Are you in some club or something?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago the dam has broken. much more to come...and the usual suspects here will still defend the greaseball mobster when it's obvious he was in up to his neck. Why? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15285457/Epstein-claims-photos-dirty-Donald-bikini-clad-women-new-emails-released-REPUBLICANS.html 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: the dam has broken. much more to come...and the usual suspects here will still defend the greaseball mobster when it's obvious he was in up to his neck. Why? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15285457/Epstein-claims-photos-dirty-Donald-bikini-clad-women-new-emails-released-REPUBLICANS.html Those girls Trump was with very well might have been trafficked by Maxwell 1
B-Man Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago The Democrats’ Latest Trump-Epstein 'Bombshell' Actually Vindicates Trump Matt Margolis Democrats are scrambling to change the subject after caving on the government shutdown, and their latest stunt is hilariously transparent. On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Democrats released emails from Jeffrey Epstein's estate that they claimed raised "serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein's horrific crimes." The problem? The emails prove nothing of the sort. ABC News even admitted "The full context of these email exchanges is not clear from the portions released by the committee Democrats." That's putting it mildly. The supposed bombshell consists of three exchanges from 2011, 2015, and 2019. In a 2011 email between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein referred to Trump as "the dog that hasn't barked," noting that an alleged victim had spent hours at Trump's house but Trump's name had "never once been mentioned." Maxwell responded, "I have been thinking about that." That's it. No accusation. No evidence. No incriminating information whatsoever. The victim referenced in those emails is Virginia Giuffre, whose name was redacted in the Democrat release. And there is probably a good reason they did. Giuffre, who previously worked at Mar-a-Lago, has consistently stated under oath that she never witnessed Trump engage in any wrongdoing. She testified that Trump never acted inappropriately with her, that she never saw Trump and Epstein together, and that she never saw Trump at any of Epstein's homes. Her memoir makes abundantly clear that Trump had zero involvement in Epstein's illegal activities. The 2015 emails show Epstein corresponding with anti-Trump author Michael Wolff, who was fishing for gossip during Trump's first presidential campaign back in 2016. Wolff, not Epstein, suggested ways to "hang" Trump politically depending on how he answered media questions about Epstein. Wolff is literally trying to urge Epstein to blackmail Trump in the email over the issue of whether Trump flew on Epstein's plane or had been to his home. "If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency," Wolff wrote. "You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt." Then there's a January 2019 email between the two in which they discussed whether Trump had banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years earlier. More at the link: https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/11/12/the-democrats-latest-trump-epstein-smear-actually-vindicates-trump-n4945915 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: The Democrats’ Latest Trump-Epstein 'Bombshell' Actually Vindicates Trump Matt Margolis Democrats are scrambling to change the subject after caving on the government shutdown, and their latest stunt is hilariously transparent. On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Democrats released emails from Jeffrey Epstein's estate that they claimed raised "serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein's horrific crimes." The problem? The emails prove nothing of the sort. ABC News even admitted "The full context of these email exchanges is not clear from the portions released by the committee Democrats." That's putting it mildly. The supposed bombshell consists of three exchanges from 2011, 2015, and 2019. In a 2011 email between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein referred to Trump as "the dog that hasn't barked," noting that an alleged victim had spent hours at Trump's house but Trump's name had "never once been mentioned." Maxwell responded, "I have been thinking about that." That's it. No accusation. No evidence. No incriminating information whatsoever. The victim referenced in those emails is Virginia Giuffre, whose name was redacted in the Democrat release. And there is probably a good reason they did. Giuffre, who previously worked at Mar-a-Lago, has consistently stated under oath that she never witnessed Trump engage in any wrongdoing. She testified that Trump never acted inappropriately with her, that she never saw Trump and Epstein together, and that she never saw Trump at any of Epstein's homes. Her memoir makes abundantly clear that Trump had zero involvement in Epstein's illegal activities. The 2015 emails show Epstein corresponding with anti-Trump author Michael Wolff, who was fishing for gossip during Trump's first presidential campaign back in 2016. Wolff, not Epstein, suggested ways to "hang" Trump politically depending on how he answered media questions about Epstein. Wolff is literally trying to urge Epstein to blackmail Trump in the email over the issue of whether Trump flew on Epstein's plane or had been to his home. "If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency," Wolff wrote. "You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt." Then there's a January 2019 email between the two in which they discussed whether Trump had banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years earlier. More at the link: https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/11/12/the-democrats-latest-trump-epstein-smear-actually-vindicates-trump-n4945915 Didn’t they say anything about scare quotes? You know, punctuation that terrifies.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 28 minutes ago Posted 28 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Nice work, lady Ok, how are you claiming this clears Trump?? 🤷♂️
4th&long Posted 25 minutes ago Posted 25 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: Ok, how are you claiming this clears Trump?? 🤷♂️ He keeps his head shoved up his ass. *****en scum defending pedo Trump. 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 23 minutes ago Posted 23 minutes ago Just now, 4th&long said: He keeps his head shoved up his ass. *****en scum defending pedo Trump. Just throwing out anything and claiming it exonerates the scum bag 1
4th&long Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago 18 minutes ago, B-Man said: The Democrats’ Latest Trump-Epstein 'Bombshell' Actually Vindicates Trump Matt Margolis Democrats are scrambling to change the subject after caving on the government shutdown, and their latest stunt is hilariously transparent. On Wednesday, House Oversight Committee Democrats released emails from Jeffrey Epstein's estate that they claimed raised "serious questions about Donald Trump and his knowledge of Epstein's horrific crimes." The problem? The emails prove nothing of the sort. ABC News even admitted "The full context of these email exchanges is not clear from the portions released by the committee Democrats." That's putting it mildly. The supposed bombshell consists of three exchanges from 2011, 2015, and 2019. In a 2011 email between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein referred to Trump as "the dog that hasn't barked," noting that an alleged victim had spent hours at Trump's house but Trump's name had "never once been mentioned." Maxwell responded, "I have been thinking about that." That's it. No accusation. No evidence. No incriminating information whatsoever. The victim referenced in those emails is Virginia Giuffre, whose name was redacted in the Democrat release. And there is probably a good reason they did. Giuffre, who previously worked at Mar-a-Lago, has consistently stated under oath that she never witnessed Trump engage in any wrongdoing. She testified that Trump never acted inappropriately with her, that she never saw Trump and Epstein together, and that she never saw Trump at any of Epstein's homes. Her memoir makes abundantly clear that Trump had zero involvement in Epstein's illegal activities. The 2015 emails show Epstein corresponding with anti-Trump author Michael Wolff, who was fishing for gossip during Trump's first presidential campaign back in 2016. Wolff, not Epstein, suggested ways to "hang" Trump politically depending on how he answered media questions about Epstein. Wolff is literally trying to urge Epstein to blackmail Trump in the email over the issue of whether Trump flew on Epstein's plane or had been to his home. "If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency," Wolff wrote. "You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt." Then there's a January 2019 email between the two in which they discussed whether Trump had banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years earlier. More at the link: https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/11/12/the-democrats-latest-trump-epstein-smear-actually-vindicates-trump-n4945915 A lot of pedos in the catholic church too. You have experience defending pedos.
Recommended Posts