leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 13 Posted September 13 18 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: after the debate, yes. the retrospectoscope is powerful. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 (edited) 13 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: I expect law makers to not react like morons to other civilian morons on social media. They aren't teenagers. It is probably less than 1% of liberals posting that *****. And you all want a civil war. It is insanely dumb. I don't want a civil war. I also don't want to live in a world where the msm stokes tensions and uses rhetoric that makes people do ***** like this. I wonder why all this violence happens when the msm continually calls people Hitler and fascists. Ned serious question. If you worked for blusky what number of acceptable posts cheering for Charlie Kirk's murder would it take before you had to issue a warning to the whole platform? Twitter didn't have to do that when the Minnesota stuff happened right. It's absolutely a left wing violence and messaging issue. Edited September 13 by AlBUNDY4TDS
nedboy7 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: I don't want a civil war. I also don't want to live in a world where the msm stokes tensions and uses rhetoric that makes people do ***** like this. I wonder why all this violence happens when the msm continually calls people Hitler and fascists. Ned serious question. If you worked for blusky what number of acceptable posts cheering for Charlie Kirk's murder would it take before you had to issue a warning to the whole platform? Twitter didn't have to do that when the Minnesota stuff happened right. It's absolutely a left wing violence and messaging issue. I disagree. The far right uses different platforms. They are more organized and hide. I would immediately issue warnings on blusky if it was me. So a question for you... what would you think if dems wanted to declare war on maga after the Minn BS. Both sides are lying when they say only the other side is violent.
JDHillFan Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 hour ago, nedboy7 said: Republicans are openly calling for retribution and a war on the left. You all should be very happy soon. Which republicans? I would like to condemn these people. You must have some names.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 4 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: I disagree. The far right uses different platforms. They are more organized and hide. I would immediately issue warnings on blusky if it was me. So a question for you... what would you think if dems wanted to declare war on maga after the Minn BS. Both sides are lying when they say only the other side is violent. Find me multiple instances of maga cheering the death after the Minnesota incident. Let's make a bet, whoever comes up with more instances of people cheering on the death of their political rivals wins? How much would you bet? I'd put up at least 5 k I can find more instances of the people cheering for Charlie's murder. Easy money. Basically your argument is the left has more outspoken proponents of violence is because they are so ***** stupid that they can't hide it better? Lolz
nedboy7 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 hour ago, JDHillFan said: Which republicans? I would like to condemn these people. You must have some names. Don't play dumb with me dude. Read some news. Your game is getting old. 1 hour ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Find me multiple instances of maga cheering the death after the Minnesota incident. Let's make a bet, whoever comes up with more instances of people cheering on the death of their political rivals wins? How much would you bet? I'd put up at least 5 k I can find more instances of the people cheering for Charlie's murder. Easy money. Basically your argument is the left has more outspoken proponents of violence is because they are so ***** stupid that they can't hide it better? Lolz I figured you wouldn't answer in an honest way. 1 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 4 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Don't play dumb with me dude. Read some news. Your game is getting old. I figured you wouldn't answer in an honest way. Lmao you're not a serious person. Why won't you take that bet? You claim it's only 1% percent and I directly challenged you and you fold like a house of cards.
nedboy7 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 13 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Lmao you're not a serious person. Why won't you take that bet? You claim it's only 1% percent and I directly challenged you and you fold like a house of cards. I did. Im so scared!
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 Just now, nedboy7 said: I did. Im so scared! Here's a tip. If you're going to try and make outlandish claims, at least have some type of actual data to back up your claims so you don't have to respond in the way you did above. Thanks
JDHillFan Posted September 13 Posted September 13 59 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Don't play dumb with me dude. Read some news. Your game is getting old. I figured you wouldn't answer in an honest way. You said republicans are calling for a war on the left and then insinuated those people were elected officials. I’m merely asking who you are talking about. If you can’t or won’t answer then your original claim amounts to horseshit. That will not be a surprise.
nedboy7 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 11 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You said republicans are calling for a war on the left and then insinuated those people were elected officials. I’m merely asking who you are talking about. If you can’t or won’t answer then your original claim amounts to horseshit. That will not be a surprise. Listen to Stephen Millers comments. I said Republicans are calling for war. Then I said elected representatives need to act with class. But you do your thing. Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican, told National Journal he "was really disgusted" by some conservatives who used Charlie Kirk's death to say "we're at war" to bolster support, calling it a "cheap, disgusting, awful way to pretend like you're a leader of a conservative movement."
JDHillFan Posted September 13 Posted September 13 1 minute ago, nedboy7 said: Listen to Stephen Millers comments. I said Republicans are calling for war. Then I said elected representatives need to act with class. But you do your thing. Senator Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican, told National Journal he "was really disgusted" by some conservatives who used Charlie Kirk's death to say "we're at war" to bolster support, calling it a "cheap, disgusting, awful way to pretend like you're a leader of a conservative movement." Idiots like you have been using the word fascist to describe Republicans nonstop. Now you’re upset that conservatives are upset over the slaughter of one of their own. Give me an effing break.
nedboy7 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 3 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Which republicans? I would like to condemn these people. You must have some names.
JDHillFan Posted September 13 Posted September 13 7 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: So far you have provided the name of Steven Miller. That’s it. I will see what he has said and condemn if appropriate.
JDHillFan Posted September 13 Posted September 13 20 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Miller’s words copied from the leftist rag Mother Jones: There is an ideology that has steadily been growing in this country which hates everything that is good, righteous and beautiful and celebrates everything that is warped, twisted and depraved. It is an ideology at war with family and nature. It is envious, malicious, and soulless. It is an ideology that looks upon the perfect family with bitter rage while embracing the serial criminal with tender warmth. Its adherents organize constantly to tear down and destroy every mark of grace and beauty while lifting up everything monstrous and foul. It is an ideology that leads, always, inevitably and willfully, to violence — violence against those uphold order, who uphold faith, who uphold family, who uphold all that is noble and virtuous in this world. It is an ideology whose one unifying thread is the insatiable thirst for destruction. We see the workings of this ideology in every posting online cheering the evil assassination that cruelly robbed this nation of one of its greatest men. Postings from those in positions of institutional authority — educators, healthcare workers, therapists, government employees — reveling in the vile and the sinister with the most chilling glee. The fate of millions depends upon the defeat of this wicked ideology. The fate of our children, our society, our civilization hinges on it. Now we devote ourselves, with love and unyielding determination, to finishing the indispensable work to which Charlie bravely devoted his life and gave his last measure of devotion. Hardly the hate-fest you seem to be upset about. Condemnation not required. Keep calling people you disagree with fascists. It will eventually work out. 1
Niagara Bill Posted September 13 Posted September 13 8 hours ago, Lost said: How many less liberal platforms are there under Trump? Some mainstream news outlets are dying because they are losing viewership not because Trump shut them down. There probably are less liberals now because the democrat party went off the rails and former moderates are now considered far right. Some truth to what you say about some dems considered right by the woke. They didn't leave the dems, the dems left them.
SectionC3 Posted September 14 Posted September 14 (edited) 10 hours ago, Yobogoya! said: You've been trying to tow a moderate line since this event, but I think you’re failing to appreciate that it doesn’t matter what ideology this gunman ultimately claims, if any- the fact is that the leftist media and corrupt education system has for years fostered a culture of acceptance regarding political violence towards anyone that it doesn’t agree with. That’s a fact. Mormons and MAGA have not fostered that culture. Trump is definitely guilty of his share of inflammatory rhetoric, but considering the terminology that has been levied against him and his family since 2015 it would be easily enough to argue he shows restraint. This is ludicrous. Try explaining to a rational person how J6 was a day of love. Nobody is without sin here. Including those who whitewash J6. Edited September 14 by SectionC3 1
JDHillFan Posted September 14 Posted September 14 24 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: This is ludicrous. Try explaining to a rational person how J6 was a day of love. Nobody is without sin here. Including those who whitewash J6. The Kirk assassination has really sent you into a J6 frenzy. Interesting. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 14 Posted September 14 8 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: cool. You're back did you bring liberal, clever girl with you? Verbose like you but more interesting...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 14 Posted September 14 1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: cool. You're back did you bring liberal, clever girl with you? Verbose like you but more interesting... Dagnabit if you don’t seem smitten by the lady. Perhaps consider asking for her number? I’m not certain of your chances, but I’d bet at a minimum you get an interesting retrospective on traditional gender specific cultural mores, the patriarchy and it’s role in shaping homogenized agrarian economic theory vis a vis the Zollverein treaties of 1800s Germany. I’ll grab the popcorn!
Recommended Posts