Is Cook worth it?

[3rdand12]

8 hours ago, Paup 1995MVP said:

Great analysis.  We have a top 2 QB in the league.  An all timer.  And we are going to to pay our RB top 5 money?   That makes no sense.  We should be all in w the passing game.  Otherwise, why pay Josh $300+ million?  
 

if the offense is going to be run centric, then we certainly have the wrong coaching staff running things.  And speaking of which, I think Joe Brady still has a lot to prove in his play calling, scheme etc.  Our short yardage play calls against KC in the Championship were absolutely terrible.  👎👎

Because he's a pass catching RB. Actually his strength.

We old guys still want that 3 down cloud of dirt and blood RB who forces missed tackles by running over sht in a loaded box

[3rdand12]

3 hours ago, SirAndrew said:

I agree about overpaying Cook, but I don’t love the way this situation has played out. We made the choice to move to a scheme that was more run heavy. Cook produced, and now we don’t want to pay him that amount. I think it would be a huge overpay, but the run heavy scheme would need to be thrown out without Cook.
 

Additionally, this run heavy scheme means nothing if we can’t gain one yard on multiple occasions in a title game. Unfortunately, most fans prefer to blame Kincaid. We’re possibly in the Super Bowl if we knew how to pick up one yard.

Not the whole scheme !

 Can easily be run centric again with proper Coaching on the field and from the Booth lol.

btw

I expect the passing game might be a bit more focused on under Brady.

 Kromer proved his point about "his Boys" 👍 and the run

[BillsFanForever19]

1 hour ago, 3rdand12 said:

Because he's a pass catching RB. Actually his strength.

We old guys still want that 3 down cloud of dirt and blood RB who forces missed tackles by running over sht in a loaded box

 

I'm not convinced that even if we had one of those guys that Beane and McDermott would play them that way.

 

They both came from "RB Committee" central in Carolina. And they've brought that with them. I don't think they subscribe to the "3 Down RB" theory. They've been bringing in different styles of Backs, utilized in different ways, with a specific 3rd Down RB from Day 1. 

 

If we uncovered a Derrick Henry style RB, I'd bet they still wouldn't utilize him as an every down RB. They'd probably still take him off the field for someone else depending on situations and to keep him from taking too much damage.

[Thurman#1]

On 6/8/2025 at 4:28 PM, balln said:

He is pretty comparable to Gibbs. Go watch the lions game again. Tell me who’d you rather have. Anyone’s “replaceable.” We can put Devin Singletary and Zach moss back there again if you want. 
 

you then contradict yourself by saying “any top RB” is dime a dozen. What?

 

you just don’t think he’s worth 15M got it.  That fine.
 

Up until this year the power question was valid. But this year James cook really put that to bed. Honestly sick of the gaslighting of people to try and justify their $ argument. Dude runs thru KC defense in AFC Championship game. And again go back to lions game - I believe his first td run - he runs thru 5 dudes at the goal line with awesome contact balance 

 

he’s our most explosive offensive weapon outside of Josh. I don’t where I fall on the $ number. But if Shakir , Benford , Groot got paid who are all solid players…. James cook needs to be paid … it’s that simple. 

 

 

It really is NOT ... that simple.

 

Because one guy gets paid, another guy should get paid ... regardless of value? Sorry, man, that makes sense in no sense whatsoever. All of those other signings - without exception - were great values.

 

As for Jamyr Gibbs vs. James Cook? Man, I like Cook a lot, but not that much.

 

Cook does have terrific contact balance. But that's not the same thing as power. That great run against the Lions showed a ton of contact balance but not particularly much power. Which is Cook.

 

Most explosive weapon outside of Josh? Yeah, fair enough, probably. But that doesn't necessarily equate to $15M. Get him back ... if the price is reasonable for him. 

Edited 3 hours ago by Thurman#1

[Ayjent]

I think about it like this even though i know the relative market for positions is different: is he as important to the Bills as other guys getting that much a year on the Bills?  I think he is and $15M is less than Benford gets and just north of an oft-injured Bosa.  Would $14M/yr get it done?  I think he didnt get the Ball enough in the 2nd half of the AFCCG - i dont blame him for staying steady at that amount per yr to stay with the Bills who he may have felt stunted his opportunity in a major game. It sucks this is the situation but i get it. 

[WNYFAN1]

21 hours ago, Paup 1995MVP said:

Great analysis.  We have a top 2 QB in the league.  An all timer.  And we are going to to pay our RB top 5 money?   That makes no sense.  We should be all in w the passing game.  Otherwise, why pay Josh $300+ million?  
 

if the offense is going to be run centric, then we certainly have the wrong coaching staff running things.  And speaking of which, I think Joe Brady still has a lot to prove in his play calling, scheme etc.  Our short yardage play calls against KC in the Championship were absolutely terrible.  👎👎

Don't disagree, but "if" the offense is going to be run centric? It 100% has been under Joe Brady. Look at that "top 2 QB's" passing numbers last year:

 

Passing Yards - 14th

Comp % - 24th

Attempts - 14th

Yrd/Completion - 9th

Passing TDs - T7th

 

Joe Brady is a "run first" guy. Or at least he has been to this point.