B-Man Posted August 20 Posted August 20 Team Trump Keeps Winning Case after Case in Federal Court by Daniel R. Street I wrote previously about the out of control federal judiciary and the measures Congress and higher federal courts could take to rein in the activist judges. One of those remedies was for the United States Supreme Court to disallow the use of Nationwide Injunctions. SCOTUS ruled against the use of Nationwide Injunctions under the Judiciary Act of 1789, as I wrote about here (though, the High Court left the door open to the abuse of the Nationwide Injunction under other authorities, such as “class action” relief). In the meantime, the Trump Administration just keeps winning one case after another. https://danielrstreet.substack.com/p/team-trump-keeps-winning-case-after?r=pax9d&utm_medium=ios&triedRedirect=true .
B-Man Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Appeals Court Overrules Judge Talwani: Planned Parenthood's Funding Can Be Cut by John Sexton There's quite a backstory to this over the past few months. It started with the passage of the Big Beautiful Bill which included a section cutting Medicaid funding from some health clinics associated with abortion providers. The bill didn't mention Planned Parenthood by name but many observers saw it as aimed largely at them. The question of whether or not Medicaid funding could be cut off from Planned Parenthood had already been settled by the Supreme Court in June in a 6-3 decision involving South Carolina. Nevertheless, when the BBB passed, Planned Parenthood immediately sued in Boston and within hours Judge Indira Talwani issued a temporary restraining order on their behalf. https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2025/09/11/appeals-court-overrules-judge-talwani-planned-parenthoods-funding-can-be-cut-n3806710#google_vignette 1
unbillievable Posted October 30 Posted October 30 Will this trend continue when Democrats inevitably return to power? Can the GOP hinder a Dem President with never-ending injunctions? I will give credit to the left, they found a loophole in the system, when they figured out that it was possible to flood the country with more illegal aliens than the court system can possibly process. Much like the looting flash mobs they perfected during the Summer of Love.
B-Man Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Trump Wins on Passports By John Hinderaker Today the Supreme Court issued an order in Trump v. Orr, the case that challenges Trump’s executive order to the effect that a person’s sex as shown on his or her passport will be the sex at birth. This order was challenged in the federal court in Massachusetts, and a Democratic Party judge issued an injunction barring implementation of the order while the case proceeds through the federal courts. This is the Democrats’ familiar strategy: bring a case before a loyal judge who will, without hearing the case on the merits, issue a preliminary injunction preventing the Trump administration from carrying out the policy in question. The “preliminary” injunction will for all practical purposes be permanent, since by the time the case is finally resolved, Trump most likely will be out of office. Through this means, the Democratic Party has effectively tried to seize control of the Executive Branch. But the Supreme Court is on to them, and the administration has consistently gotten these preliminary injunctions dissolved in the Supreme Court. That is what happened here. The unsigned (as is the case with such orders) majority opinion says: This case concerns an Executive Branch policy requiring all new passports to display an individual’s biological sex at birth. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts preliminarily enjoined the Government from enforcing the policy, and the First Circuit declined to stay the injunction pending appeal. The Government then filed this stay application. Applying our familiar stay factors at this preliminary stage, we grant the application. Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth—in both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/11/trump-wins-on-passports.php
Recommended Posts