Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Chicago is one of the richest cities in the world 

And they have been led politically by democrats for many decades. Why do so many people get shot and killed there and why is their education system such a disaster? They’ve got $$!!

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I heard they were offered a trip to Chicago, they declined and  requested asylum in a safer place.  

either you heard wrong or your lying...what are your thought on deporting unaccompanied, noncriminal minors anywhere without a hearing?

Edited by Joe Ferguson forever
Posted
Just now, JDHillFan said:

And they have been led politically by democrats for many decades. Why do so many people get shot and killed there and why is their education system such a disaster? They’ve got $$!!

They are so many people there, that's why there are more murders. You understand math, right? 

 

Education system? Compared to where, Mississippi? 

 

Shut up 

Maybe you don't understand math then 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

the constitution is but it's not either or...policing could be improved without sending federal troops and crime decreased by decreasing poverty.

 

The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. It expresses the principle of federalism, whereby the federal government and the individual states share power, by mutual agreement. The Tenth Amendment prescribes that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution, and that all other powers not forbidden to the states by the Constitution are reserved to each state, or to the people.

How about you ship a couple thousand copies of the Constitution to Chicago and advise those people being shot dead in the streets by criminals unimpeded by the rule of law as administered by the city and State governments to use them as shields to stop a bullet?

Posted
1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

How about you ship a couple thousand copies of the Constitution to Chicago and advise those people being shot dead in the streets by criminals unimpeded by the rule of law as administered by the city and State governments to use them as shields to stop a bullet?

and the rule of law is paramount to states right and the illegality of a national police force run by trump.

 

why don't you burn your copy of the constitution.  you're already pi$$ing on it.

Posted
1 hour ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

so you're good with guatemala?

I think this matter should be worked out.  I’m not at all certain how 600 minors arrive unaccompanied without an explanation, whether trafficking is involved, where the parents are or anything else.  
 

Yes, I’m good with pausing the matter until details are worked out and we know what’s happening.  

1 hour ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

Chicago is one of the richest cities in the world 

And if the narrative was that individuals were being placed in the wealthiest (read liberal) part of the city (where the Chi Goosians likely live), perhaps it would not seem nearly as dangerous as where they most likely would be sent.  
 

I have always enjoyed my time in Chicago, but it’s got some major issues with crime and violence. 

Posted
20 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

another straw man.  No one is supporting criminals.  Let them face justice.  Just don't slip a bunch of unaccompanied minors of to whoknkows where in the middle of the night or other similar illegal acts.  But, by all means, go for the criminals first.

That's not what LA, NYC, & Chicago mayors are saying ! After they claimed to be sanctuary cities and those others states against the historic illegal immigration allowed by the Biden administration the others said OKAY then you take all the illegals that they are allowing into the country only for them to then B**CH about not having money or space to support them .

 

Going then to the feds saying they needed more money instead of stopping it at the source . Now the powers that be say BAD MAN Trump is not going to come into my city and get rid of these people but continue to take tax payer money to support the illegals because the dictator is trying to fix the problem created by Biden .

 

Then people are seeing right through that BS line so now that Ass hat Governor & Mayor of Chicago are saying it's the Texas Gov. fault for sending all those poor illegal immigrants to Chicago . Well if your dum asses would have closed the border instead of the cackling VP doing the job she was given and her along with Mayorcos saying "OH We don't have a immigration problem" NONE of this would be in play but it is and NONE of you all will admit WHO made this but are the first in line to B word about the guy trying to clean up the mess !!!! 

 

SO grow a set and start blaming the source of the problem no matter if you voted for or against them and stand behind the solution weather you voted for or against them and just because there are children involved which this administration is trying to reunite them with their families but if Biden wouldn't have allowed it again NONE OF THIS WOULD BE HAPPENING ...

Posted
On 2/16/2025 at 3:48 PM, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Sounds good.  Also sounds like the market s unconvinced it's a panacea.  But good for you if you doubled.  I nearly tripled on Eli Lilly and their diabetes/weight loss drug and while a big deal, it's nowhere near as groundbreaking as what you say about this technology.  And yes. I saw the chart deal.  Was that around when it doubled?

edit:  The more I look at this, the more I ope you timed this just right.  Otherwise, you're just speculating

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BE/?fr=sycsrp_catchall

 

And now its well over 60. A three banger.

Sure sounds like "the market is unconvinced."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

Cool.  I'll stick with steady, low risk returns.  95% in 5 years.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/^GSPC/

 

This isn't about personal returns, and has never been.

It is about you stating that the market is not in favor of the technology, which you are clearly ignorant of, or others claiming we need energy resources from other countries.

What I mentioned has quadrupled this year.

 

You do you, but what you do is go after anyone who you think is a Trump supporter, even when they are not.

The subject doesn't matter.

Same as the moron who suggests we shoot down airplanes without provocation.

He has the same affliction.

Posted
1 hour ago, sherpa said:

 

This isn't about personal returns, and has never been.

It is about you stating that the market is not in favor of the technology, which you are clearly ignorant of, or others claiming we need energy resources from other countries.

What I mentioned has quadrupled this year.

 

You do you, but what you do is go after anyone who you think is a Trump supporter, even when they are not.

The subject doesn't matter.

Same as the moron who suggests we shoot down airplanes without provocation.

He has the same affliction.

I said the tech doesn't appear to be a panacea.  Perhaps I'm wrong and it turns out to be an early amazon like buy...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

I said the tech doesn't appear to be a panacea.  Perhaps I'm wrong and it turns out to be an early amazon like buy...

 

That isn't the point.

The point is that no matter what is presented by people you don't like, for reasons that are not accurate, you and a few others will dismiss anything said.

It's a loser way to live.

  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

That isn't the point.

The point is that no matter what is presented by people you don't like, for reasons that are not accurate, you and a few others will dismiss anything said.

It's a loser way to live.

that was my point.  it's now twice that I've had an opportunity to write "panacea.

Posted
On 2/17/2025 at 5:02 PM, Joe Ferguson forever said:

All of that is cool.  But it is far from the kind of market support this tech should see if it was viewed as a some panacea to our energy issues and global oil geopolitics....

 

So now it's about $80, four times what it was when I brought it up and you claimed the market didn't support it.

Ya. Good call.

400% in seven months is not good.

×
×
  • Create New...