Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

There it is, another suburban basement revolutionary.

 

Ok then, just pray that the Trump supporters that you and others on here hate don't start using physicality when they decide that they are going to fight back.

 

We all lose then. 

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
34 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

Fantastic synopsis of the Russiagate hoax.  For the adults.  Useful idiots we don't care as we already know that you're forever divorced from reality.

 

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted


 

…the Obama administration’s spy agencies’ assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump was deliberately corrupted by then-CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who were “excessively involved” in its drafting, and rushed its completion in a “chaotic,” “atypical” and “markedly unconventional” process that raised questions of a “potential political motive.” 

 

Further, Brennan’s decision to include the discredited Steele dossier, over the objections of the CIA’s most senior Russia experts, “undermined the credibility” of the assessment.

 

The “Tradecraft Review of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment [ICA] on Russian Election Interference” was conducted by career professionals at the CIA’s Directorate of Analysis and was commissioned by CIA Director John Ratcliffe in May. 

  • Shocked 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

…the Obama administration’s spy agencies’ assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election to help Donald Trump was deliberately corrupted by then-CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who were “excessively involved” in its drafting, and rushed its completion in a “chaotic,” “atypical” and “markedly unconventional” process that raised questions of a “potential political motive.” 

 

Further, Brennan’s decision to include the discredited Steele dossier, over the objections of the CIA’s most senior Russia experts, “undermined the credibility” of the assessment.

 

The “Tradecraft Review of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment [ICA] on Russian Election Interference” was conducted by career professionals at the CIA’s Directorate of Analysis and was commissioned by CIA Director John Ratcliffe in May. 

 

Bump

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Big Blitz said:

Absolute silence from the commies.  

 

All reliable enough for Finding!

 

 

NEW: Report via @CIADirector Ratcliffe

•Concludes that in 2016 then CIA Director Brennan and others rushed the Russia election interference intelligence assessment
•Brennan dismissed high level warnings that the Clinton campaign opposition research the “Steele dossier” did not meet intel collection standards + risked “credibility”
•Handling of dossier was highly irregular + limited analytic rigor
•Media leaks reinforced narrative "with high confidence" that Russia intervened to help candidate Trump 

Pg. 4

"...two senior leaders of the CIA mission center responsible for Russia—strongly opposed including the Dossier, asserting that it did not meet even the most basic tradecraft standards."

NOTE:  Basic Tradecraft Standards means established collection methods, techniques and operations.

Pg. 5

"Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness....Brennan ultimately formalized his position in writing, stating that “my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report."

Worth reading full 8 pages 👇

cia.gov/static/Tradecr…

×
×
  • Create New...