Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Once you put the word Trans in front of the word Woman you're already saying it's a man no matter what kind of genitalia mutilation someone has had had done. 

Posted

JK Rowling takes the bait on that whole "define a woman" thing. 

In the old print days, the saying was "don't pick an argument with someone who buys ink by the gallon." The modern-day equivalent: "don't expect to win a written argument against the most successful writer of our age." Burn baby, burn!

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 6 months later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted

 

 

With the British Supreme Court ruling on women maybe she should be quieter. . . . . . . . . . . . yeah right.

 

d0f135869764844f854f7e71ad9fa0775b458f99

Posted

 

 

Janice isn't claiming to speak for all women, @PennyRed,

 but given that you aren't one ('the category of "woman"

does not fully describe my lived experience') it's hard to see

why you should be speaking for any women at all.

 

Literally nobody thinks the Supreme Court ruling 'legislates

trans people out of existence.'

 

Trans people have exactly the same rights and protections

they had before the ruling, and unless they've mass combusted

while I wasn't paying attention, I'm fairly sure they continue to exist.

 

If some trans-identified people in the UK are currently

experiencing rage and disappointment because the

Supreme Court clarified that they don't have rights they

believed they had, the responsibility lies firmly with activist

groups and sections of the media who've persistently argued,

falsely, that gender transition turned a person into the opposite

sex for all practical purposes in the eyes of the law.

 

You can personally take some responsibility for that state of affairs,

of course, because you've spent the last few years enthusiastically

championing the removal of single-sex spaces for women and girls.

 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...