BillsFanNC Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 6 Author Share Posted February 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 (edited) This is the one Dems want burned most: Edited February 6 by US Egg 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 6 Author Share Posted February 6 The iron law of useful idiot projection says no. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 6 Author Share Posted February 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 I’ve blocked every one of those accounts linked, did they list which books specifically or is this cherry picking redacted documents? Did they actually want books removed from the site or was this about Amazon algorithms pushing stuff like flat earther books? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: I’ve blocked every one of those accounts linked, did they list which books specifically or is this cherry picking redacted documents? Did they actually want books removed from the site or was this about Amazon algorithms pushing stuff like flat earther books? Do you see the irony that you blocked certain accounts but are against blocking books? Why block anyone? I want to see everything - the good the bad and the indifferent. I'm 100% against banning books or blocking of any information, but I also believe certain books should be age appropriate just like a rated R movie isn't for elementary school kids. Absolutely nothing wrong with removing porn from school libraries. If you want your kids to read that trash then buy it for them yourself. Meanwhile, on the other side, it's literally trying to ban the sale of certain books. I hope to see EVERYONE condemn this from both sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 28 minutes ago, KDIGGZ said: Do you see the irony that you blocked certain accounts but are against blocking books? Why block anyone? I want to see everything - the good the bad and the indifferent. I'm 100% against banning books or blocking of any information, but I also believe certain books should be age appropriate just like a rated R movie isn't for elementary school kids. Absolutely nothing wrong with removing porn from school libraries. If you want your kids to read that trash then buy it for them yourself. Meanwhile, on the other side, it's literally trying to ban the sale of certain books. I hope to see EVERYONE condemn this from both sides. Me blocking Twitter accounts doesn’t limit anyone else’s viewing of them, though. It’s my choice; I simply don’t want to see these people’s takes now that the Twitter algorithm seems to push them. I just want to see what the entire story is here because it seems very strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDIGGZ Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Me blocking Twitter accounts doesn’t limit anyone else’s viewing of them, though. It’s my choice; I simply don’t want to see these people’s takes now that the Twitter algorithm seems to push them. I just want to see what the entire story is here because it seems very strange. Doesn't seem strange at all. Anything they don't like online or social media or books they try and ban or block. It's in the twitter files and now it's in the Amazon files apparently. We know Google and Facebook do it as well. No big surprise here. The only surprise is when they get caught and people are so committed to their side that they make excuses for it. I understand your point about blocking in that you don't want to see it but meanwhile anyone who wants to can. I just meant as a personal choice I want to see all information and then decide for myself. If you are only hearing 1 side then you are in an information vacuum so how do you know what's real? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 6 Author Share Posted February 6 (edited) A typical useful idiot in roundyfuk.c Which books???!! Was it algorithms??!! Cherry picked??!! But nobody should expect anything but this from useful idiots. The issue here is THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT encouraging a company to censor books it does not approve of. That's it. That's the issue. It doesn't matter what books. In fact it could be the very same anal/oral porn books that are inappropriate in ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, and it would still be wrong. it doesn't matter if Amazon ended up altering their algorithm to make certain books less visible. It's that it was done at the behest of the friggin White House. Meanwhile the same useful idiots will scream book burning about anal/oral porn books taken off the shelves at elementary schools while they are still readily available at book stores and Amazon. Edited February 6 by BillsFanNC 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
US Egg Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Another example of what a rotting pos the Dems are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 24 Author Share Posted February 24 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeviF Posted March 25 Share Posted March 25 Nooooo not those banned books! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts