Cookie Gilchrist Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 TD haters must give credit where due. http://boards.atlantafalcons.com/index.php?showtopic=88158 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sound_n_Fury Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 TD haters must give credit where due.http://boards.atlantafalcons.com/index.php?showtopic=88158 343981[/snapback] God, I hate MBs like that (and Billszone) that allow photos and other crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcjeff215 Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 God, I hate MBs like that (and Billszone) that allow photos and other crap. 343992[/snapback] Yeah, I was just about to say that... just say no to graphic signatures. -Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 My favorite post so far in that thread: Poster 1: "Why didnt this eye disorder effect him when he was a Buffalo Bill?" Poster 2: "Because he had Moulds taking on the double team" Oh well...its a good thing for Falcons fans' dignity that we wasted the pick we got from that trade on an injured RB... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 My favorite post so far in that thread: Poster 1: "Why didnt this eye disorder effect him when he was a Buffalo Bill?" Poster 2: "Because he had Moulds taking on the double team" Oh well...its a good thing for Falcons fans' dignity that we wasted the pick we got from that trade on an injured RB... Yeah but McGahee's leg disorder didn't affect him because Moulds took on the double team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 God, I hate MBs like that (and Billszone) that allow photos and other crap. 343992[/snapback] Though if you're allowed to have them, at least get it right. One guy, in an effort to support Vick, had one photo of Vick on money, followed by Bob Barker on "The Price is Right," and then when he meant to use another "Price is Right" photo, he strayed from Bob Barker and went to Gene Rayburn, who did wonderfully on Match Game...however, this photo is from another show. Not Match Game. And DEFINITELY NOT Barker or The Price is Right. (/sarcasm) for those of you who think that because I'm right, I'm also being serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tux of Borg Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 When was the last time you saw Ron Mexico make a clutch throw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krazykat Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 One of those posters said he was so successful because he lined up in the slot, but that's simply not true. He was successful becasue we launched the ball over 600 times and for no other reason. Hell, how many teams put the ball up over 600 times and don't have two WRs over 1K, unless of course they have a Moss or some monster superstar which are few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRH Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 Doesn't THIS quote sound familiar, though: I want to see anyone beat out Price. I'm through with him. No heart, no guts. Potential don't mean squat...performance is everything. Put up or shut up. Play like a man or get the f--- off the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 Doesn't THIS quote sound familiar, though: 344211[/snapback] them words haven't been heard around these parts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gantrules Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 When was the last time you saw Ron Mexico make a clutch throw? 344020[/snapback] about the same time as Drew Bledsoe with the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 God, I hate MBs like that (and Billszone) that allow photos and other crap. 343992[/snapback] I disagree. I wish we had graphic sigs here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 I disagree. I wish we had graphic sigs here. 344249[/snapback] eats up too much bandwidth, i'd rather have a faster loading page besides, most of those graphic sigs are an eyesore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 besides, most of those graphic sigs are an eyesore 344254[/snapback] you got that right . glad we do not have them here . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsWatch Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 eats up too much bandwidth, i'd rather have a faster loading page besides, most of those graphic sigs are an eyesore 344254[/snapback] Simple solution - turn off signatures. I do so on BillsZone and TBD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike32282 Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 Simple solution - turn off signatures. I do so on BillsZone and TBD. 344305[/snapback] Thank you! I was waiting for someone to say that. Hell, you can even turn off the other images if you choose. But if everyone's biggest gripe is the big sigs, shut them off and you'll never see them again. Problem solved. i do that sometimes when i dont want all that clutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 i do that sometimes when i dont want all that clutter. 344314[/snapback] That's what I like about the "ignore" feature. Less clutter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike32282 Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 That's what I like about the "ignore" feature. Less clutter. 344327[/snapback] You better not be talking about me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsWatch Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 Thank you! I was waiting for someone to say that. Hell, you can even turn off the other images if you choose. But if everyone's biggest gripe is the big sigs, shut them off and you'll never see them again. Problem solved. i do that sometimes when i dont want all that clutter. 344314[/snapback] And if you want signatures and avatars but some are sooo offensive get a REAL browser which allows you to block images and give you a control bar like FireFox. Occasionally I turn on signatures/avatars and when I do after a bit I just start blocking the images I see over and over and over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted May 25, 2005 Share Posted May 25, 2005 Some of those sig pics are rather good; most are just trash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts