Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Also consider that source - attractive young woman making a claim that’s difficult to prove, amplified by one of the most notorious agitation propaganda accounts on Twitter. 

most of what we find politically is click driven.  i suppose everything is now.   i'm not denying that these classes exist either.  i can't imagine of of the nonsense you'd find at the university of vermont in "culture studies".  not to ***** on vermont, but some schools are more liberal than others, and some classes are more liberal than others.   if this is a required class for her major, then reconsider your major.  i just don't think this is the college experience as most are being let to think.

 

you want to be an accountant, take business  classes.  i guarantee you won't find much politics in the typical core majors.  not once did i hear anything about politics in organic chem.  a lot of it is what you sign up for. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, teef said:

most of what we find politically is click driven.  i suppose everything is now.   i'm not denying that these classes exist either.  i can't imagine of of the nonsense you'd find at the university of vermont in "culture studies".  not to ***** on vermont, but some schools are more liberal than others, and some classes are more liberal than others.   if this is a required class for her major, then reconsider your major.  i just don't think this is the college experience as most are being let to think.

 

you want to be an accountant, take business  classes.  i guarantee you won't find much politics in the typical core majors.  not once did i hear anything about politics in organic chem.  a lot of it is what you sign up for. 

 

At my kid's school (he's a business major) it was a required class to fulfill distribution requirements.

 

Yes that is the typical college experience.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, JFKjr said:

 

At my kid's school (he's a business major) it was a required class to fulfill distribution requirements.

 

Yes that is the typical college experience.

i had to take a year of, (i honestly don't remember what it was called) cultural studies.  one class that i picked.  guess what?  i didn't become radicalized!!! at all?  did you child change their opinion on politics?  did they become anti-american?  no.  it's a scare tactic my friend.  i graduated 25 years ago and this was a truth then as much as it is now.   

 

edit:  and is this the typical college experience?  i went to a boston college.  we had to take a year of religion, a year of philosophy, and a year of cultural studies.   it was a catholic liberal arts school, so it made sense.

Edited by teef
Posted
1 minute ago, teef said:

i had to take a year of, (i honestly don't remember what it was called) cultural studies.  one class that i picked.  guess what?  i didn't become radicalized!!! at all?  did you child change their opinion on politics?  did they become anti-american?  no.  it's a scare tactic my friend.  i graduated 25 years ago and this was a truth then as much as it is now.   

Do you think the college landscape and political landscape has changed in the 25 years since you've been in college?

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

I have not accused anyone of “manipulating” young people. That’s a matter of your inability to read with discernment. I have stated that 18yo’s show up on campus not knowing how to cross the street safely and find themselves in an atmosphere OVERWHELMINGLY liberal in nature. That is not debatable. You want to imagine that has no bearing on the personal development of young people. Weird position to hold.

Nope.  I don't.  You project that.  Or want to think that.  Or something else. 

 

Point is, the "liberal" viewpoint historically was predominant at institutions of higher learning.  But maybe that has started to change in the past several years.  And, if the "liberal" viewpoint previously was a problem, then t's fair to ask why the "conservative" viewpoint that apparently now is much more prevalent on campus and on line somehow is not seen the same was as the former viewpoint. 

Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

Nope.  I don't.  You project that.  Or want to think that.  Or something else. 

 

Point is, the "liberal" viewpoint historically was predominant at institutions of higher learning.  But maybe that has started to change in the past several years.  And, if the "liberal" viewpoint previously was a problem, then t's fair to ask why the "conservative" viewpoint that apparently now is much more prevalent on campus and on line somehow is not seen the same was as the former viewpoint. 

You’re desperate. There’s no “was” predominant. The word is IS. There’s no debate on the prevailing political position of university faculties. Good lord. 

  • Disagree 1
Posted
Just now, JDHillFan said:

You’re desperate. There’s no “was” predominant. The word is IS. There’s no debate on the prevailing political position of university faculties. Good lord. 

Nope.  You changed the nature of the point.  I said "at institutions of higher learning."  Influencers nowadays can be anyone--professors, the Kardashians, and anyone with a microphone and an audience.  Like Kirk.  How much of his content is consumed at universities?  My guess is a lot based on what I read here.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Do you think the college landscape and political landscape has changed in the 25 years since you've been in college?

 

 

sure, but the core idea hasn't seemed to change.  universities lean on the liberal side and were consider a place for debate, protest, etc.  kids were killed on the campus of kent st.  nothing new.  what's new is the level of virulence towards everyone's political ideas, which is social media driven.  any "protests" i saw were tame...it was nothing like the nonsense that happened at columbia, where i think the president of the university completely failed those students.  it's also a different population than where i went to school.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, teef said:

sure, but the core idea hasn't seemed to change.  universities lean on the liberal side and were consider a place for debate, protest, etc.  kids were killed on the campus of kent st.  nothing new.  what's new is the level of virulence towards everyone's political ideas, which is social media driven.  any "protests" i saw were tame...it was nothing like the nonsense that happened at columbia, where i think the president of the university completely failed those students.  it's also a different population than where i went to school.  

Your last sentence definitely holds some truth. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Nope.  You changed the nature of the point.  I said "at institutions of higher learning."  Influencers nowadays can be anyone--professors, the Kardashians, and anyone with a microphone and an audience.  Like Kirk.  How much of his content is consumed at universities?  My guess is a lot based on what I read here.  

Yes. It’s a giant world of media, social media, and differing views. You should avail yourself of some of it rather than making 5 minute judgements on people. Or basing anything on what you read here. Obviously. 
 

This does nothing to alter the political ideology of the faculties at the vast majority of institutions of higher learning. Nobody is debating that fact. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:

Your last sentence definitely holds some truth. 

yeah...it's not an equal comparison.

 

and i'm not coming at this from any political side.  what i see posted from both corners has been so provocative and unnecessarily for the sake of viewers that it's hard not to be sad.  the division is deep and looks to be getting no better.  just when i saw someone pushing that colleges are spreading anti-american idea to warp the young, social media has to be called out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

Yes. It’s a giant world of media, social media, and differing views. You should avail yourself of some of it rather than making 5 minute judgements on people. Or basing anything on what you read here. Obviously. 
 

This does nothing to alter the political ideology of the faculties at the vast majority of institutions of higher learning. Nobody is debating that fact. 

Indeed. The question is whether "right wing" influencers, like Kirk, now have more time on task or impressions or whatever you'd like to call with metric than do college professors with college students. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Indeed. The question is whether "right wing" influencers, like Kirk, now have more time on task or impressions or whatever you'd like to call with metric than do college professors with college students. 

Maybe future elections will tell that story. If it’s actually been the case for a while, it’s obviously working. The democrats are toxic at this point - and that’s with a jackass like Donald Trump running the show. Maybe the democrats need people like you, Roundy, Redhawk, TH3, and Joshypoo to get out front and spread the gospel. 

Posted
1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

Maybe future elections will tell that story. If it’s actually been the case for a while, it’s obviously working. The democrats are toxic at this point - and that’s with a jackass like Donald Trump running the show. Maybe the democrats need people like you, Roundy, Redhawk, TH3, and Joshypoo to get out front and spread the gospel. 

 

"Prove us wrong!"

 

rentner.gif

×
×
  • Create New...