Jump to content

January 6th 2021 FEDSURRECTION: The Corrupt Biden Regime: White House, FBI, DOJ, media, committee


BillsFanNC

Recommended Posts

The fact is that Jan 6 was a deadly insurrection in which Trump supporters beat cops with flagpoles, full stop. That’s it."

 

The FACT is that not a single cop died from injuries due to J6 rioting.

 

The FACT is not a single homicide charge was brought.

 

The FACT is no one was charged for a so-called "insurrection" where people did not even bring firearms into the capitol building.

 

The FACT is the FBI knew months in advance and had informants within the extremist groups planning to be there.

 

The FACT is there were numerous undercover police officers in the J6 crowd.

 

The FACT is Capitol Police held open doors and even escorted the "Q Anon shaman" to the Senate chamber.

 

The FACT is there were photographers and videographers all over the Capitol building. But the DOJ has charged independent and conservative journalists who were there reporting on it.

 

The FACT is Donald Trump is on record wanting 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the electoral college challenges.

 

The FACT is Speaker Pelosi refused to send National Guard troops even after former Capitol Police Chief requested them multiple times.

 

J6 was a SET-UP.

 

If we had news outlets instead of propaganda outlets, Nicolle Wallace would be thrown off the air.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments on Thursday That Could Overturn Convictions of Hundreds of J6 Rioters

RICK MORAN 

 

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear a case that could impact the 2024 presidential election and lead to the release of or reduction in sentences for hundreds of January 6 rioters.

 

Before the trials began, the J6 prosecutors decided that the most serious charge they could get a conviction for was an obstruction charge. The prosecutors were alleging that the rioters obstructed an official proceeding of Congress, making the crime eligible to be prosecuted for anyone who "corruptly alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or otherr object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or (2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.”

 

There are two points of contention for defense attorneys. The first is the definition "corruptly" and the second is the "otherwise" wording that leads, they say, to an overly broad interpretation of the statute.

 

https://pjmedia.com/rick-moran/2024/04/14/supreme-court-will-hear-arguments-on-thursday-that-could-overturn-convictions-of-hundreds-of-j6-rioters-n4928165

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...