Warcodered Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Bogus. LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerlyofCtown Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 On 10/22/2020 at 8:14 PM, Backintheday544 said: Trump has actually done a lot of ground work on legal cases to avoid any prosecution during a Presidency in the many different legal proceedings going on. So if Biden did anything illegal, Trump's already laid the ground work and set some legal precedence to help protect him. Please explain. This should be real informative. Or maybe just baseless talking points. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 8 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said: Please explain. This should be real informative. Or maybe just baseless talking points. We can start with tax return cases: The cases are Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP (the accounting firm) consolidated with Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG and Trump v. Vance. Mazars and its companion bank cases (henceforth Mazars) involve four subpoenas issued by three House Committees: the House Financial Services Committee, the House Intelligence Committee and the House Oversight Committee. Vance involves a subpoena in aid of a grand jury investigation served on behalf of Cyrus Vance, the District Attorney for the County of New York, on Trump’s accounting firm (Mazars) seeking the same documents the House committees requested. Trump's attorneys are effectively trying to limit Congressional investigation functions. Precedent in these cases will be used by the Executive for decades to come, including the Biden adminstration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 13 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said: We can start with tax return cases: The cases are Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP (the accounting firm) consolidated with Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG and Trump v. Vance. Mazars and its companion bank cases (henceforth Mazars) involve four subpoenas issued by three House Committees: the House Financial Services Committee, the House Intelligence Committee and the House Oversight Committee. Vance involves a subpoena in aid of a grand jury investigation served on behalf of Cyrus Vance, the District Attorney for the County of New York, on Trump’s accounting firm (Mazars) seeking the same documents the House committees requested. Trump's attorneys are effectively trying to limit Congressional investigation functions. Precedent in these cases will be used by the Executive for decades to come, including the Biden adminstration. Hoax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 10 minutes ago, westside2 said: Hoax And how are actual cases with actual Trump legal arguments a hoax? The one case has already been to the Supreme Court once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 42 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said: Please explain. This should be real informative. Or maybe just baseless talking points. We also have the Mueller report and the testimony to Congress where Mueller explained a long standing DOJ policy that the DOJ cannot indict a sitting President. https://www.vox.com/2019/7/24/20708393/robert-mueller-report-trump-olc-justice-department-indictment-charge-sitting-president Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said: And how are actual cases with actual Trump legal arguments a hoax? The one case has already been to the Supreme Court once. Did they win their argument in the supreme court? Hoax 1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said: We also have the Mueller report and the testimony to Congress where Mueller explained a long standing DOJ policy that the DOJ cannot indict a sitting President. https://www.vox.com/2019/7/24/20708393/robert-mueller-report-trump-olc-justice-department-indictment-charge-sitting-president The Mueller report? With the 18 democrat lawyers doing the "investigation "? That report is as phony as your takes. Once again, HOAX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerlyofCtown Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 3 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: We can start with tax return cases: The cases are Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP (the accounting firm) consolidated with Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG and Trump v. Vance. Mazars and its companion bank cases (henceforth Mazars) involve four subpoenas issued by three House Committees: the House Financial Services Committee, the House Intelligence Committee and the House Oversight Committee. Vance involves a subpoena in aid of a grand jury investigation served on behalf of Cyrus Vance, the District Attorney for the County of New York, on Trump’s accounting firm (Mazars) seeking the same documents the House committees requested. Trump's attorneys are effectively trying to limit Congressional investigation functions. Precedent in these cases will be used by the Executive for decades to come, including the Biden adminstration. Lol. House commitees are not members of the Judicial branch of the United States government and have been overreaching concerning their power for a long time. So they aren't limiting them, they don't actually have the power they think they do. Trump is just dismissing the witch hunt. Unfortunately a lot of Americans are not intelligent enough to see what Congress has been upto since the day he won election. All the work the DNC did to undermine the American people and fraudulently elect Hillary was for naught. They are pissed. 2 hours ago, Backintheday544 said: We also have the Mueller report and the testimony to Congress where Mueller explained a long standing DOJ policy that the DOJ cannot indict a sitting President. https://www.vox.com/2019/7/24/20708393/robert-mueller-report-trump-olc-justice-department-indictment-charge-sitting-president Lol. It's all a farce. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backintheday544 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 4 hours ago, westside2 said: Did they win their argument in the supreme court? Hoax The Mueller report? With the 18 democrat lawyers doing the "investigation "? That report is as phony as your takes. Once again, HOAX. Yes, they won the argument in the Supreme Court. And it's not the report but more so the confirmation that DOJ has a policy to notnindict a President while in office. So, if you want Biden in jail while he's President, it won't come from DOJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts