Jump to content

The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19


Hedge

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

So not debunked.  And, contrary to your representation, also a “study.”  Just not a clinical trial of the spectrum-wide efficacy of HCQ, in part because it considered patients with poor clinical outlooks.  Which, I note, is perfectly consistent with what Cavuto said.  If you’re in a vulnerable population, this is a bad plan and based on nothing other than a Trump fiction which people like GG credit based on the identity of the speaker.  

 

Along those lines, your point about Africans and Asians not dying en masse from HCQ incorporates those outside of vulnerable populations into your group and overlooks the possibility that those in vulnerable populations did not fare well with the drug.  So another GG hoax debunked.  

 

Happy Tuesday, hoaxer.  

 

Speaking of hoaxes, Cavuto misrepresented a study of already terminally ill patients to warn people not to take a drug hundreds of millions have taken over 4 decades.   Your contortions to explain it away is very telling.

 

Bottom line, you fell for a hoax and are twisting to defend it.  Please point to a study or a trial that shows people die by taking HCQ for prevention.  I'll wait.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

Speaking of hoaxes, Cavuto misrepresented a study of already terminally ill patients to warn people not to take a drug hundreds of millions have taken over 4 decades.   Your contortions to explain it away is very telling.

 

Bottom line, you fell for a hoax and are twisting to defend it.  Please point to a study or a trial that shows people die by taking HCQ for prevention.  I'll wait.

Since it's killing people and the President is taking it...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whatdrought said:


If trump comes out In favor of oxygen, any chance the media will boycott? That’d be great...

That's bull. 

 

Trump is anti-science, anti-anything that is disagreeable to him. 

 

You guys trying to discredit the media are just making excuses for the lies your party wants people to believe. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That's bull. 

 

Trump is anti-science, anti-anything that is disagreeable to him. 

 

You guys trying to discredit the media are just making excuses for the lies your party wants people to believe. 

projection_lens_overhead-projector_-1007

 

You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

projection_lens_overhead-projector_-1007

 

You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize...

Any normal person would be against a lying jack ass that has no business being president on so many levels. He really is a f'n POS. Ok? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Speaking of hoaxes, Cavuto misrepresented a study of already terminally ill patients to warn people not to take a drug hundreds of millions have taken over 4 decades.   Your contortions to explain it away is very telling.

 

Bottom line, you fell for a hoax and are twisting to defend it.  Please point to a study or a trial that shows people die by taking HCQ for prevention.  I'll wait.

 

Rule #2 on the first paragraph, hoaxmaster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

projection_lens_overhead-projector_-1007

 

You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize...


Is that their take or Graham’s? 

Just now, GG said:

 

I thought you left?


No, you just quoted me from a few minutes ago. 5G digs deeper than we thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

projection_lens_overhead-projector_-1007

 

You're talking about a group that is so aggressively anti-anything Trump that the man was nominated twice for the nobel peace prize fro negotiating peace deals in the middle east and their take on it was that it's time to do away with the nobel peace prize...

 

...with an agenda of  raising taxes, opening borders, defunding police, and a laughable 12 trillion$ new green deal....

and lets not forget a president who can barely finish a paragraph coherently let alone a sentence.

 

yikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

Is that their take or Graham’s?

Is there an Opinion label I'm missing? Is the Atlantic a publisher or a platform?

1 minute ago, Unforgiven said:

 

...with an agenda of  raising taxes, opening borders, defunding police, and a laughable 12 trillion$ new green deal....

and lets not forget a president who can barely finish a paragraph coherently let alone a sentence.

 

yikes.

I think you got those backwards ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BuffaloHokie13 said:

Is there an Opinion label I'm missing? Is the Atlantic a publisher or a platform?

 

I don't read the Atlantic so I'm not sure how they label their editorials, but it's under the heading "IDEAS."

 

It's also an idea I never heard about until you posted that and since I'm obviously a liberal media lemming I should have heard it before now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Rule #2 on the first paragraph, hoaxmaster. 

 

It's self explanatory - he used a study of people who were deep into Covid to warn people from taking it for prevention.  But you knew that, grave dancer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wAcKy ZeBrA said:

I don't read the Atlantic so I'm not sure how they label their editorials, but it's under the heading "IDEAS."

 

It's also an idea I never heard about until you posted that and since I'm obviously a liberal media lemming I should have heard it before now.

I clicked the ideas part to check if that was their label, it still doesn't say it's opinion. It just says it's arguments, essays, and inquiries. At the end of the day, it was posted by a recognized media outlet and quite frankly it's a disgusting reaction to our president being recognized for some good work. But they can't let him have even one good day. If it's Trump then it simply cannot be good. Ever. There were several other reactions as well that were less aggressive, but still took the time to attack the character of the people making the nominations in an effort to frame the discussion towards discredit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...