Jump to content

OIG FISA Report Discussion and the real reason for the FBI Mar-a-Lago raid


Recommended Posts

Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

My comment is that you're making a lot of assumptions and are now trying to twist the narrative on a nearly 500 page report that spanned a very very long time and was advertised over here as an ultimate presentation in objectivity.

 

Your comments show you don't know anything about this topic. 

 

And instead of owning it, you're trying to project your ignorance onto others. 

 

It's a weak game, and one you're playing poorly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Foxx said:

ummm... multiple, different trains of thought are what comprise a thread. bringing in information only helps that discourse to be not only informed but lively. i am going to assume you can follow more than one train of thought at a time due to your being,  'a long time lurker'.

 

Anyone can post links to external sources, they are a dime a dozen and can be chosen to support any view point.  The value of the discussion is people spending time crafting thoughtful responses with the intent to gain genuine understanding.  I do not think I am alone in the view that these threads can be more of a source of discussion than a place to see regurgitated content. 

Edited by SugarCone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Your comments show you don't know anything about this topic. 

 

And instead of owning it, you're trying to project your ignorance onto others. 

 

It's a weak game, and one you're playing poorly. 

 

What comments are those?

 

Why are you running away from this?  You clearly have plenty of time on your hands to educate me.  So educate me.

 

I don't have the time for this banter.

 

I know who Joseph Misfud is.  I'm not lying about that like you lied about what I said about only knowing about the guy from what I heard on Fox News.  Don't know why you lied so blatantly like that.  Disappointing.

 

So, what am I missing?  Please tell me what it is I need to know about him that will totally blow my mind and shift my perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SugarCone said:

 

Anyone can post links to external sources, they are a dime a dozen and can be chosen to support any view point.  The value of the discussion is people spending time crafting thoughtful responses with the intent to gain genuine understanding.  I do not think I am alone in the view that these threads can be more of a source of discussion as a post to see regurgitated content. 

 

Years were spent writing thoughtful responses, backed by undisputed evidence. Years. 

 

This is the end game. No more time for hand holding. Time for people to do their own work. The links provided more often than not contain primary source documentation which you can read and vet for yourself. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SugarCone said:

 

Anyone can post links to external sources, they are a dime a dozen and can be chosen to support any view point.  The value of the discussion is people spending time crafting thoughtful responses with the intent to gain genuine understanding.  I do not think I am alone in the view that these threads can be more of a source of discussion as a post to see regurgitated content. 


So, have you slogged through the whole report (I am only halfway through)? What is your opinion of it? Pretty damning for top tier FBI people from the Obama administration in through their firing by President Trump, huh? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

No Youtube on my current server.

 

What does it state?


For ***** sake... 

I am trying really hard to take you at your word that you are not trolling, you understand the genesis and set-up of this soft-coup, and that you want to learn. You are not making it easy.

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transplantbillsfan said:

 

What comments are those?

 

You're embarrassing yourself now. 

 

1 minute ago, transplantbillsfan said:

Why are you running away from this?  You clearly have plenty of time on your hands to educate me.  So educate me.

 

I'm on the road -- and the only one running is you. And you've been running for weeks now on this question. You have already tried and failed to turn this on me, it didn't work. Isn't working. And all it makes you look like is an ignorant asshat who thinks he's clever. 

 

You're posting history shows you're not. At all. 

 

2 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

I don't have the time for this banter.

 

Things a coward says.

 

2 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I know who Joseph Misfud is. 

 

Who is he? Why does he matter? 

 

Go.

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


For ***** sake... 

 

He's not worth the time. I tried. He's just another clown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Years were spent writing thoughtful responses, backed by undisputed evidence. Years. 

 

This is the end game. No more time for hand holding. Time for people to do their own work. The links provided more often than not contain primary source documentation which you can read and vet for yourself. 

 

I just think this might not be the place for the "end game", you might choose a medium that suits your style of screaming into the void - like twitter.  https://twitter.com/derangedrhino
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SugarCone said:

 

I just think this might not be the place for the "end game", you might choose a medium that suits your style of screaming into the void - like twitter.  https://twitter.com/derangedrhino
 

 

You ask for thoughtful responses. 

 

No one down here has taken more time or spent more energy doing exactly that over the past three years on this subject. 

 

***** off. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

My comment is that you're making a lot of assumptions and are now trying to twist the narrative on a nearly 500 page report that spanned a very very long time and was advertised over here as an ultimate presentation in objectivity.

really? commenting that 17 'mistakes' that were warranted for inclusion in the report, all fell one way seems to indicate a bias is making a lot of assumptions? wow, you are off your rocker, transplant. i tried being civil with you and even being nice to you because you have expressed a tenderness that you hurt when being confronted with brutal truthfulness and this is how you choose to interact. 

 

i may have to re-evaluate my decision on how to engage with you. as is my right since you are going to lose our bet.

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SugarCone said:

 

I just think this might not be the place for the "end game", you might choose a medium that suits your style of screaming into the void - like twitter.  https://twitter.com/derangedrhino
 


I'm not certain what you are trying to prove or gain here. Either hop in with real discussion, or you will end up ignored (as in the 'blocked' sense of the word).

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


For ***** sake... 

I am trying really hard to take you at your word that you are not trolling, you understand the genesis and set-up of this soft-coup, and that you want to learn. You are not making it easy.

 

I'm telling the truth.

 

No Youtube access.

 

Get frustrated if you want, but that's the truth.

 

Is Youtube really the place to go for this irrefutably sourced evidence?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

I'm telling the truth.

 

No Youtube access.

 

Get frustrated if you want, but that's the truth.

 

Is Youtube really the place to go for this irrefutably sourced evidence?

 

You don't know what she linked (which was an interview from first hand people involved in the matter) yet you still think it's not good evidence because it came from YouTube. 

 

Things NPCs say. 

 

You're TERRIBLE at this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SugarCone said:

 

Anyone can post links to external sources, they are a dime a dozen and can be chosen to support any view point.  The value of the discussion is people spending time crafting thoughtful responses with the intent to gain genuine understanding.  I do not think I am alone in the view that these threads can be more of a source of discussion than a place to see regurgitated content. 

 

 

Gosh............that sounds familiar.

 

 

giphy.gif

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Gosh............that sounds familiar.

 

 

giphy.gif

 

 

I'd be happy to hop on discord or something if you're interested.   I don't know why your first inclination is I am the same person as someone else?   

 

Or - I'll DM you my phone number and we can chat. 

Edited by SugarCone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SugarCone said:

 

 

I'd be happy to hop on discord or something if you're interested.   I don't know why your first inclination is I am the same person as someone else?   

 

Or - I'll DM you my phone number and we can chat. 

 

If you were really the luker you say you are, you'd know... 

 

Just saying.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...