muppy Posted November 23 Posted November 23 1 hour ago, B-Man said: you REFUSE to even say a word about why Trump coddled Maxwell. none of MAGA faithful are willing to speculate . why? because it STINKS It HURTS his credibility.mIt just does ***CRICKETS************ pathetic maga. BRAVO COWARDS 1
JFKjr Posted November 23 Posted November 23 26 minutes ago, muppy said: you REFUSE to even say a word about why Trump coddled Maxwell. none of MAGA faithful are willing to speculate . why? because it STINKS It HURTS his credibility.mIt just does ***CRICKETS************ pathetic maga. BRAVO COWARDS Maybe Trump has bigger fish to fry. Are we even sure Epstein is dead? You seem really attached to this issue. Any particular reason why? And where was that interest when the Really Sharp Guy could've given us all this information? 1
B-Man Posted November 23 Posted November 23 2 hours ago, muppy said: you REFUSE to even say a word about why Trump coddled Maxwell. none of MAGA faithful are willing to speculate . There is your answer Mup. verb 1.form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence. No thanks. .
JDHillFan Posted November 23 Posted November 23 2 hours ago, muppy said: you REFUSE to even say a word about why Trump coddled Maxwell. none of MAGA faithful are willing to speculate . why? because it STINKS It HURTS his credibility.mIt just does ***CRICKETS************ pathetic maga. BRAVO COWARDS To you, anyone TO your right is MAGA faithful. That’s WHY you are NOT to be TAKEN seriously. I am to the RIGHT of you but am NOT what DIMWITTED people like you, Redhawk, and Nedboi reflexively CALL maga. The move to a different PRISON smells fishy. There is certainly MORE to the story. Using HAPHAZARD all caps is tiring AND tiresome.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted November 23 Posted November 23 (edited) 34 minutes ago, B-Man said: There is your answer Mup. verb 1.form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence. No thanks. . You maga thugs make stretching conclusions on flimsy evidence when it supports your narrative but you can't connect the dots here. Read what this Fox report had to say including the opinion of a former palm beach county state attorney. You don't find it at all suspicious that she was moved a week after being interviewed by Todd Blanche when she tried to exonerate trump? Be honest for once. https://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-accomplice-ghislaine-maxwell-moved-new-prison-amid-fight-over-answers-immunity "The decision on whether someone gets moved to a better facility is generally made by the Bureau of Prisons, and there's a procedure to follow," Aronberg said. "It's hard to imagine that the lengthy interview that Maxwell had with the number two official at the Department of Justice had nothing to do with the transfer. It almost certainly did." The meeting came just days after the House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena asking Maxwell to testify in front of lawmakers regarding Epstein’s crimes. Maxwell’s legal team has since asserted she would consider testifying if granted immunity – a demand the panel swiftly rejected. Edited November 23 by Joe Ferguson forever 1 1
muppy Posted November 23 Posted November 23 2 hours ago, B-Man said: There is your answer Mup. verb 1.form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence. No thanks. . what's that sound? ***crickets*** a big NOTHING I rest my case. IT STINKS to High Heaven and You know it 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You maga thugs make stretching conclusions on flimsy evidence when it supports your narrative but you can't connect the dots here. Read what this Fox report had to say including the opinion of a former palm beach county state attorney. You don't find it at all suspicious that she was moved a week after being interviewed by Todd Blanche when she tried to exonerate trump? Be honest for once. https://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-accomplice-ghislaine-maxwell-moved-new-prison-amid-fight-over-answers-immunity "The decision on whether someone gets moved to a better facility is generally made by the Bureau of Prisons, and there's a procedure to follow," Aronberg said. "It's hard to imagine that the lengthy interview that Maxwell had with the number two official at the Department of Justice had nothing to do with the transfer. It almost certainly did." The meeting came just days after the House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena asking Maxwell to testify in front of lawmakers regarding Epstein’s crimes. Maxwell’s legal team has since asserted she would consider testifying if granted immunity – a demand the panel swiftly rejected. Bingo 1 1
JDHillFan Posted November 23 Posted November 23 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You maga thugs make stretching conclusions on flimsy evidence when it supports your narrative but you can't connect the dots here. You pretended Biden was fine. The most obvious dots we have seen in our lifetime went unconnected for you. Embarrassing.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 23 Posted November 23 1 hour ago, muppy said: what's that sound? ***crickets*** a big NOTHING I rest my case. IT STINKS to High Heaven and You know it Bingo “It stinks” isn’t a case, Mup. Why not just state what you think Trump is hiding (and Biden, Garland et al hid before him) and why they hid it? Do you think Maxwell had the goods on Trump but chose not to barter with the Garland DOJ?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted November 24 Posted November 24 (edited) 22 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: “It stinks” isn’t a case, Mup. Why not just state what you think Trump is hiding (and Biden, Garland et al hid before him) and why they hid it? Do you think Maxwell had the goods on Trump but chose not to barter with the Garland DOJ? Why not state your thoughts about Maxwelll's transfer to a resort prison when most of America considers her public enemy #1? Edited November 24 by Joe Ferguson forever
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 24 Posted November 24 10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Why not state your thoughts about Maxwelll's transfer to a resort prison when most of America considers her public enemy #1? I’ve already done that. Thank you. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted November 24 Posted November 24 17 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I’ve already done that. Thank you. Muppy doesn't think so. Nor do I. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted November 24 Posted November 24 7 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Muppy doesn't think so. Nor do I. It happens. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted November 24 Posted November 24 4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: It happens. often
Homelander Posted Thursday at 06:09 AM Posted Thursday at 06:09 AM On 8/2/2019 at 1:28 PM, Deranged Rhino said: pedophilia and sex trafficking of minors @B-Man could you kindly ask your galactic reg freak for a comment? I’m sure with his one or two followers on X, there must be something profound to say
Homelander Posted yesterday at 04:00 AM Posted yesterday at 04:00 AM On 8/2/2019 at 1:28 PM, Deranged Rhino said: I should have known better than to think on a topic as bi-partisan as pedophilia and sex trafficking of minors partisan asshattery wouldn't rear its head.
Homelander Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago On 8/2/2019 at 3:54 PM, Deranged Rhino said: would rather cover for a convicted pedo / accused trafficker of children
Homelander Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago On 8/3/2019 at 12:59 PM, Deranged Rhino said: No one but you is making this a “helping” issue. This issue isn’t about being good for one side and bad for the other, Tibs. Its about the kids.
Recommended Posts