BuffaloRush Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 Not to offend my elders, but Gil is about 85 years old. He last worked in personnel about 30 years ago. He’s from a totally different era and a lot has changed. I don’t really take him seriously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimer1960 Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 On 2/16/2018 at 8:34 AM, bigK14094 said: Bad attitude....don't think he fits the Bills in that regard. And, I don't like guys like that either......... Agree. They just gave Dareus away for not being dedicated, I think Richardson is similar- ultra-talented but lacking want-to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsredneck1 Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 On 2/16/2018 at 10:38 AM, ddaryl said: I'd rather sign Cousins and draft the best DT at 21 or 22 that would be the ulimate outcome. imagine if they took vea and hurst.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blacklabel Posted February 17, 2018 Share Posted February 17, 2018 Last I read/saw, Richardson and Seattle were both said to have a fair amount of mutual interest in getting a deal done. I doubt Richardson fits the character mold they want here. And Gil Brandt may have 60+ years of experience in football but some of his claims in recent years make me question his opinions quite a bit. When he ranked Johnny Manziel his number one overall prospect (not number one overall QB, mind you, but in his opinion the best football player out of every 2014 prospect) I really started disregarding much of his stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted February 18, 2018 Share Posted February 18, 2018 So we just traded a big contract in Dareus who had motivation and off the field issues now were going to sign another DT to a big contract with motivational issues? Not happening imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts