Jump to content

Fed Raises Rate


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

 

The bankERS themselves, as Iceland continues to demonstrate.

 

Edited key word: typing on the run.

 

Yeah...probably not. Iceland's kind-of a special case, considering that their entire banking industry is about a tenth the size of Citi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Yeah...probably not. Iceland's kind-of a special case, considering that their entire banking industry is about a tenth the size of Citi.

 

It's not apples to apples, but it's surprising a lot of folks who predicted them to crater. They've grown faster than any other economy in Europe.

 

But yes, it's a much smaller scale than the world's biggest economy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's not apples to apples, but it's surprising a lot of folks who predicted them to crater. They've grown faster than any other economy in Europe.

 

But yes, it's a much smaller scale than the world's biggest economy.

 

More to the point...when an Icelandic bank goes under - or when ALL the Icelandic banks go under - Icelandic companies have other alternatives for financing.

 

When the major world banks become illiquid and the entire capital market crashes and major employers can't float commercial paper to make payroll...bankers don't suffer nearly as bad as the public. Which is what came close to happening in '08.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

More to the point...when an Icelandic bank goes under - or when ALL the Icelandic banks go under - Icelandic companies have other alternatives for financing.

 

When the major world banks become illiquid and the entire capital market crashes and major employers can't float commercial paper to make payroll...bankers don't suffer nearly as bad as the public. Which is what came close to happening in '08.

 

Make him do his own homework

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

None of that makes his academic work on the Fed any more or less truthful. Nor is he the only academic who acknowledges the Federal Reserve is not a part of the US Government... Something you'd realize if you did the homework for yourself rather than sticking to the erroneous position that the Federal Reserve is an agency or branch of the government because it's what you "know" to be the truth. Remember when you "knew" no Europeans ever owned guns before? Yeah, this is like that.

 

You're wrong. You've been wrong since the start.

Yes, he is a 9-11 truther, thinks the CIA, Nixon, LBJ, Reagan and my aunt Minnie conspired to killed Kennedy, wants cancer patients to drink a magic potion to cure them, thinks HIV is a fraud and now he is comparing the Federal Reserve to a banana cartel!

 

Bananas??? :lol:

 

He has zero credibility at all. I'm sort of surprised you didn't connect the dots to the petro-dollar conspiracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, he is a 9-11 truther, thinks the CIA, Nixon, LBJ, Reagan and my aunt Minnie conspired to killed Kennedy, wants cancer patients to drink a magic potion to cure them, thinks HIV is a fraud and now he is comparing the Federal Reserve to a banana cartel!

 

Bananas??? :lol:

 

He has zero credibility at all. I'm sort of surprised you didn't connect the dots to the petro-dollar conspiracy

He only one lacking credibility is the person trying desperately to cling to his belief that the Fed is a part of the us government because it has the word federal in its title. :lol: Edited by Deranged Rhino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So is the White House cafeteria.

 

But Greggy says the fed isn't part of it at all. And Tom thinks only the people with operational control, management, authority and power are part of the government. So you guys disagree

Incorrect. He said it was both.

 

And you said not part of government, he says government does play a role
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Greggy says the fed isn't part of it at all. And Tom thinks only the people with operational control, management, authority and power are part of the government. So you guys disagree

 

 

And I don't give a !@#$ what Greggy and Tom say. See I can think for myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you said not part of government, he says government does play a role

 

And I never said government doesn't play a role... again, different people have different opinions. But facts are facts. And the fact is that the Federal Reserve Board of Governors is not the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is a collection of private banks working together (rather than competing). These private banks are 100% independent from the federal government and serve their own interests above all else, they are in no way a branch or agency of the United States Government... the US Government is their partner/client.

 

History and common sense show this to be true. Even your own sources are telling you this is true, you just can't/won't take the time to read what's actually said in the sources you're linking.

I have a much better handle on it than you clowns do.

 

Again, so far the evidence you've presented contradicts this conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a much better handle on it than you clowns do. Do you understand it better than chef? He thinks you are wrong!

Oh, and Go Sabres! Time to watch! :)

 

No, you really don't.

 

Your apparent understand is that the Federal Reserve is some monolithic central banking organization that exerts direct control over over the financial activities of member banks. It's not. It's a diffuse system (not even an organization, really) of relationships, privately funded, consisting mostly of private institutions save for the Board of Governors, who are only empowered to make broad policy decisions. Which is why Wells Fargo can be part of the Federal Reserve (which they are), but not part of the federal government - they're not only not on the Board, they're insulated from direct representation on the Board by the Federal Reserve Banks, which are non-profit and private.

 

The irony being that your apparent understanding is far, far closer to the typical "conspiracy understanding" that you accuse us of having. You have a truly amazing ability to be, not just completely wrong, but to be completely wrong across multiple dimensions of wrongness. You're so wrong, it defies classical definitions of wrongness...I would have to invent a whole new theory of relativistic quantum wrongness to adequately explain how wrong you are.

 

 

And thanks for the Sabres reminder. I'd completely forgot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...