YoloinOhio Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 I think you make a good point about change for change sake. But that may not be how the FO perceives it. And I don't think the FO wanted Fitz gone, necessarily. I think they knew (rightly so) that he wasn't gonna be that "10-15 year guy" (as Buddy so often put it) and they wanted him to renegotiate down to a more suitable contract to serve as a veteran mentor. Can't blame him for saying no, either. GO BILLS!!! All good points to be sure. But I think they can accomplish some things on parallel tracks to be sure. Look, I don't want to speculate. I just won't be surprised if they make an aggressive move at the position. GO BILLS!!! i won't be surprised either. With Pegs money and Whaley's comments on WGR a couple weeks ago re: orton I would guess they would be aggressive at that position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Pats have played virtualy same schedule (afc east and west, NFC north), only difference swap browns and texans for bengals and colts. They've scored 120 more points than we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 @ESPNStatsInfo: Packers (at Bills on Sunday) are next-to-last in points allowed per drive in road games (2.63). Jets are worst at 2.65 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC2002 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 Pats have played virtualy same schedule (afc east and west, NFC north), only difference swap browns and texans for bengals and colts. They've scored 120 more points than we have. The Pats have had a unprecedented 15 years of continuity lol . Why would you expect our offense to be on the same level as the Patriots ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProcessAccepted Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 I've been keeping track too. The worst Ds we played were Chicago and Houston, both EJ. Man we really should have beat Houston. That pick 6 still has me shaking my head. Pats have played virtualy same schedule (afc east and west, NFC north), only difference swap browns and texans for bengals and colts. They've scored 120 more points than we have. They are a better team, though I think the gap is closing talent wise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 This is such a lame excuse. There are 32 teams in the league and odds are you are going to have to play more than a couple in the top half of defenses. This isn't college. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 This is such a lame excuse. There are 32 teams in the league and odds are you are going to have to play more than a couple in the top half of defenses. This isn't college. Tell that to the NFC South. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 (edited) Very simple though you need to beat who you play, Doesn't matter the rank. Six of those teams that faced the Bills faced our tougher defense and won. Edited December 14, 2014 by Beef Jerky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPS Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 As always...justify and rally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted December 14, 2014 Share Posted December 14, 2014 Tell that to the NFC South. AFC North says thanks. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts